Now that the mods have cleared up some of the garbage. Let's continue...
Originally posted by mosey
none of us have absolute truth about anything
One thing that is ABSOLUTE TRUTH is that thousands of people watched a plane slam into the south tower with their own eyes. It was recorded by at
least 43 different video cameras by major media, independent journalists AND home videos from private citizens. Every single one showing the same
plane and the same sounds.
Both plane impacts also left plane debris on the ground. One of them being a smoking jet engine that the tv fakery cult would rather say is planted.
The planters must've taken a torch to it right before they planted it so that it could be all steamy and warm.
Originally posted by mosey
you are completely naive and ignorant....you are arrogant and you think you know everything
Very mature. You go ahead and keep calling people names so you don't have to deal with getting owned with debunks. Try being more civil and a little
less confrontational and maybe somebody might start taking you a little seriously.
Originally posted by djeminy
bonez will respond by telling you the following:
Oh yeah. Yet another post dedicated to me. Shows the continued maturity and civility of the tv fakery disinfo cult. They can't deal with the debunks,
so they attack instead.
Originally posted by king9072
- planes don't melt into buildings
If the steel columns had failed, I'd almost agree, but the columns didn't fail. Only the connectors did. You keep forgetting about the B-25 the
melded into the Empire State building in 1945. Must've been tv fakery then even though they didn't have tv's:
Originally posted by king9072
- things in motion fail to stay in motion when they slam into steel
Once again, the steel columns didn't fail. The connectors did.
Originally posted by king9072
- Theres no way that an alluminam airliner hull can travel right through a skyscraper, protruding out the opposite site IN TACT
Wow, BLATANT disinfo in that claim. There was no exit hole in the south tower for a real fuselage to have exited:
And there was no plane inserted into the live stream for a fake fuselage to have exited:
So what you just claimed is purposeful and blatant disinformation. Very sad.
Originally posted by king9072
- That you can't claim a plane is "Dive bombing" when the best media propaganda clearly shows the plane level and cruising
Oops, more blatant disinfo again. Two shots of the second plane coming in from a higher altitude. The plane didn't level out until the last approx. 3
seconds:
Originally posted by king9072
- that planes far exceeding their maximum recommended speed are hard to control, and are liable to break apart at such extreme speeds
Obviously not as indicated by the 43 different angles of the second plane slamming into the south tower.
Originally posted by king9072
- people who have never flown a real 767, cannot dive bomb from the sky and perfectly into a building
Which is why the planes were more than likely remote controlled as that is the plausible going theory.
Originally posted by king9072
- Maximum speeds for airliners cannot be achieved at sea level
They can if they're coming down from a higher altitude as shown in the 2 animated images I posted above. You would need some kind of understanding of
flight dynamics to understand.
Originally posted by king9072
If he could just accept any ONE of the aforementioned concepts, he would understand that it's just not possible.
I've just shown every single bit of it to be possible.
Originally posted by king9072
BONES UR AN ALLSTAR OMGAD BEST EVER BEBUNKOMANIAC IN THE WORLD EVAR LIVED WP
More mature posting. With comments like these, it's no wonders you don't understand flight dynamics, camera angles or simple physics.
Originally posted by mosey
Remember, this thread is about NO planes not the Truth
Yes, you've shown time and time again that you don't care about TRUTH and only care about spreading purposeful disinfo. We get it.
[edit on 30-3-2009 by _BoneZ_]