It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"No person who denies the being of a God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state. . . .
The only thing unique was that the Government would not become a Church like the Church of England and it was to promote the Christian Religion since that happened to make up most of them in different sects.
Originally posted by sadisticwoman
reply to post by Salt of the Earth
Just because it doesn't sit well with your religious bigotry, doesn't mean they're actually bad people.
Originally posted by Seasick
The way women are treated in many Islamic nations is reprehensible if not downright disgusting. You can't jive me, I've been in Kuwait, Iraq, Qatar and throughout the the UAE. These are among the more "liberated" of states at that. I have a daughter, and I would not want her force fed this type of "religion" at school, and I'd actively protest it. Learning about other cultures and religions in a strictly scholarly and educational context is one thing, and it acceptable. I don't find it acceptable to expose other people's children to belief systems with the intent to mold them into it, however. My daughter is more than her ability to have babies and she will not be any man's religiously sanctioned punching bag. No thanks. That said, I do not agree with our troops being over there and NO I do not think we should stay another day. Let them do what they will. And if you think Muslims aren't "fornicating and aborting" then you are sadly naieve and probably should travel more places.
Originally posted by Aermacchi
I have been to Iran and I think they were some of the most Gracious most freindly people I have ever met but they have a hatred of Jews and they have been brainwashed into thinking the Holocaust was a hoax. They get taught things you would have to see to believe and if anyone nukes anybody I would say Israel should nuke them because Iran has every intention of nuking Israel as soon as they can get the Bomb. That may be any day now.
Originally posted by Aermacchi
I never said a damn thing about what I thought of the holocaust, did I?
Originally posted by Aermacchi
Show me where I said I think people need to die if they do not believe 6.5 million jews died in the holocaust.
Originally posted by Aermacchi
When I ask you for a definition of what Zionist means ...
Originally posted by Ablastard
What the author of that article failed to mention is that Moses is not only an important figure in Judaism, but also in Islam. In fact, Muslims believe that Moses was a prophet of God and that he was given the Ten Commandments by God on top of Mount Sinai, just like the Jews believe.
Originally posted by Salt of the Earth
Originally posted by Seasick
The way women are treated in many Islamic nations is reprehensible if not downright disgusting. You can't jive me, I've been in Kuwait, Iraq, Qatar and throughout the the UAE. These are among the more "liberated" of states at that. I have a daughter, and I would not want her force fed this type of "religion" at school, and I'd actively protest it. Learning about other cultures and religions in a strictly scholarly and educational context is one thing, and it acceptable. I don't find it acceptable to expose other people's children to belief systems with the intent to mold them into it, however. My daughter is more than her ability to have babies and she will not be any man's religiously sanctioned punching bag. No thanks. That said, I do not agree with our troops being over there and NO I do not think we should stay another day. Let them do what they will. And if you think Muslims aren't "fornicating and aborting" then you are sadly naieve and probably should travel more places.
REPLY: Seasick, you are quite correct in your response, and Salt of The Earth should be warned about TROLLING and being WAY off topic in his rants.
Now, on to business:
I think the Muslim women are treated just as well as the women here in America are. In fact, it's getting so the majority of men in American don't even like women at all, they just like other men. And they want to sodomize their own wives and don't want any children and have slept with hundreds of women (and maybe men too) by the time they get married.
REPLY: You obviously know and have studied nothing about what you wrote above.
"....Muslims are virgins, men and women both, when they marry, and they treasure their children and their families. I don't see this as an evil thing at all. I think these people need to be left alone to live their lives, whether we agree with their religion or not is not our business to go sending planes across the ocean to shock and awe them."
REPLY: Muslim men and women are virgins when they marry? The men are allowed to fornicate with young boys, so they are still considered "virgins" when they marry. That's OK with you?
If a Muslim woman is raped she is most often stoned to death in public, an "honor killing." That's OK with you?
Saddam, a Muslim, torturing children in stinging rooms, and rape rooms for both men and women, used to coerce "the truth" from people? That's OK with you? We were not at war with Iraq, but with Saddam. Now the people have the freedom to choose how they wish to live and governed.
"...As to the fornicating and aborting Muslims, maybe the ones involved with Americans might. Not the rest. The shieks of Saudi Arabia is another story. They are total perverts and are part of the white slavery traffic, paying half a million for women and children. They also are joined at the hip with the Zionist Neocons and are just despicable people who have sold their souls along with their Freemason friends, and they themselves are Freemasons."
[edit on 24-3-2009 by Salt of the Earth]
Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Remind me when Obama denied believing in God? Or heaven and hell?
The only thing unique was that the Government would not become a Church like the Church of England and it was to promote the Christian Religion since that happened to make up most of them in different sects.
Yes exactly, a Church which controlled the will of the King of Britain through religious bantering and prophecising.
That implies separation of Church & State, not a disharmonious unity of it as they had in medieval Britain.