It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by plumranch
Why should I criticise Republicans? They have little to nothing to do with the Stimulus Bill, the Budget, the next bailouts etc. The liberals, I mean Democrats are doing a fine job of destroying themselves with their unbridled liberal enthusiasm. Like Obama said it's a shame not to take advantage of a crisis! He's like a little kid in the candy bowl these days. What liberal mischief can he sneek by next, giggle, giggle!
BTW I don't think it was so much the Republicans who screwed the country in the last 8 years as much as it was the media's selective, skewed reporting that in the end finally made it look like Bush et alia were the bad guys while completely ignoring the shenanigans of the Franks and Dodds who were behind the lines screwing the public. That is what I have spent the last 6 months trying to point out.
And Kudo's to you for working to give Dodds the boot!
reply to post by mybigunit
So what the Republicans did was threw a bunch of their crap in there, voted no, then went home and bragged to their constituents they got them stuff.
reply to post by mybigunit
As far as the past 8 years I mean really? Now I dont know whether to break this down into categories or what but the F*** up lists for GWB and his Republican cronies are so long including nearly bankrupting us
This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.
It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.
What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.
The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating.
They end up worse off than before.
This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.
Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)
Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)
Isn't there a story here? Doesn't journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren't you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?
I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. "Housing-gate," no doubt. Or "Fannie-gate."
Originally posted by plumranch
Pelosi ASKED Republicans what they wanted in the bill. The Republicans KNEW the bill would pass whether they voted for it or not. Had Republicans not given their input regarding what "pork" they needed for their state I'm sure that Pelosi would have given them NOTHING and the people of the district would have been unfairly harmed by omission. Had the Republicans voted for the Stimulus bill they would have been booted out the next election. Call it bait and switch if you want, I call it political necessity.
Where did Chris Dodds fit into the banking collapse? He was chairman of the Senate banking committee at the time this all went down and he and Barney said that it all would be "just fine"! He and Barney defended the bad "junk" loans made possible by CRA to the bitter end. Every time a Republican eg. Bush in 2002 proposed banking reform to stop the fraud, Dodds would yell, RACIST! and stop them in their tracks. The bad CRA loans led to the collapse of Fannie and Freddie and then to AIG collapse and on to world banking collapse.
Originally posted by plumranch
And yes, Freddie, Fannie, and AIG didn't just give contributions to Dems, they gave (much smaller) contributions to sellected Republicans.