It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by andre18
reply to post by network dude
I read 1984 years ago, what's you're point? What? - you think the government is going to turn big brother on you because of the increased cost of ammo?
Originally posted by Averysmallfoxx
reply to post by Mekanic
So if they are already taking account then why make it a bigger deal. Like I said, this bill would allow them access to all sorts of information they do not need. It is likely that when you purchase your ammo and your weapon the vendor is by law obligated to maintain records but does not need to report everything directly. Perhaps just the registry of weapons is required and not ammo.My point is they dont need to know so why give them information that COULD give them an edge if they wanted to get rid of people who would have the means to put up a valiant and perhaps dangerously effective resistance to oppression?
Originally posted by jfj123
First,
The OP has misrepresented the topic by claiming "NO ONE CAN SELL ANY AMMUNITION AFTER JUNE 30, 2009". This is of course NOT TRUE.
How can we expect to get accurate info in this thread when the OP himself is falsifying and misrepresenting the actual bill ????
Although I do agree that the government is getting a bit too involved with our 2nd amendment rights, the OP's fear mongering isn't helping the situation.
Originally posted by Averysmallfoxx
Originally posted by jfj123
First,
The OP has misrepresented the topic by claiming "NO ONE CAN SELL ANY AMMUNITION AFTER JUNE 30, 2009". This is of course NOT TRUE.
How can we expect to get accurate info in this thread when the OP himself is falsifying and misrepresenting the actual bill ????
Although I do agree that the government is getting a bit too involved with our 2nd amendment rights, the OP's fear mongering isn't helping the situation.
Your point I understand however I think you are over
exaggerating just a little yourself.It has been noted that he made a mistake in the title by a few members already, a moderator has not stepped in yet, but I am sure when he/she does it will be with no more or less than appropriate action. Until then lets just discuss the facts we know about the issue as it has developed since that is the topic of discussion to begin with
Originally posted by jfj123
Originally posted by Averysmallfoxx
Originally posted by jfj123
First,
The OP has misrepresented the topic by claiming "NO ONE CAN SELL ANY AMMUNITION AFTER JUNE 30, 2009". This is of course NOT TRUE.
How can we expect to get accurate info in this thread when the OP himself is falsifying and misrepresenting the actual bill ????
Although I do agree that the government is getting a bit too involved with our 2nd amendment rights, the OP's fear mongering isn't helping the situation.
Your point I understand however I think you are over
exaggerating just a little yourself.It has been noted that he made a mistake in the title by a few members already, a moderator has not stepped in yet, but I am sure when he/she does it will be with no more or less than appropriate action. Until then lets just discuss the facts we know about the issue as it has developed since that is the topic of discussion to begin with
Well to start, one of the sources the OP cited was SNOPES. The Snopes article has the bill listed as UNDETERMINED. So we've gone from UNDETERMINED to nobody can have bullets ???