Subject: No one can sell any ammunition after June 30, 2009, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 46 times


reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 10:37 AM by wonderworld
reply to post by Nventual



No irony really. Yes us American gun owner may look like radicals on a mission. Yes we would require the use of a gun to fight someone else who had one. A bat wouldn’t work too well, unless you were hiding behind the door when they entered. I do have alternate weapons, as well. Depending on the circumstances. I understand your point, however those of us who own guns will fight for the right to keep them, including ammo, as trivial as it may seem.


reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 10:38 AM by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Nventual



I can say the same thing for New Hampshire.

On the rare occasion a firearm is used criminally it is by some moron from Massachusetts. So why mess with New Hampshire? Considering how many guns are owned in New Hampshire and the complete absence of any laws restricting them in New Hampshire the one shooting we have a year is a more impressive stat than any you would find in the countries with all out bans. Especially when the "knife crime" is factored in.


reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 10:42 AM by wonderworld
reply to post by Nventual



I will tell no one how much ammo I have. If I went to Walmart to buy more ammo they may consider me an arms dealer. I like my confidentiality . The Feds have no right to monitor how much of anything I buy. That’s what Freedom is all about. Why do they want this information? I prefer the non-tracking method better. They can tax me now if they wish. That’s not the issue.


reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 10:43 AM by groingrinder
reply to post by andre18



YES YOU HAVE BEEN OWNED FROM YOUR VERY FIRST POST. There were many issues at Columbine. For instance bullying by other students. But everyone wants to make it a "gun" issue. It isn't. If other students or at least the teachers would have been allowed to have guns for protection, Columbine would have been contained to the first or second victims.


reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 10:51 AM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by Nventual



Again, what don't you get about criminals still having guns if we don't have them?

Until you can answer that question this debate won't go any further.

Also I don't think you have an illegal immigration problem that is dominated by the Drug Cartels currently going on. Not to mention these drug cartels are currently forcing Mexico in what seems to be a civil war. The only way to get a gun in Mexico is through the government and even then it is only certain calibers of weapons.

So in other words not only is running drugs illegal in Mexico automatic weapons are illegal too. But it doesn't stop the drug cartels from getting them and they also get grenades and light anti-tank weapons.


[edit on 20-3-2009 by Hastobemoretolife]



reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 10:53 AM by wonderworld
reply to post by Nventual



I’m simply curious what the weapon of choice is in your Country. You must have one. You say quote “Humans wanting to be one step ahead of their own kind by using weapons.” Is this to mean you have no crime or violence where you live? If so I’ll hop a plane and be right up. Human nature has always had good and evil. It sounds like you live in Paradise. I’m not meaning to sound skeptical but wonder what it must be like there?



reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 11:08 AM by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by sadisticwoman





The second amendment:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

The fourth amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Uh huh, of course you are also the person that favors socialist and marxist ideals so it doesn't surprise me.

And numerous Supreme court rulings have upheld that the fourth amendment also means your right to privacy.


reply posted on 20-3-2009 @ 11:11 AM by j2000
reply to post by andre18



It's not.

The point being why would we take advice from someone who's country gave everything up to their Govt.

Sounds like feed mis-information and jerking everyone's chain for kicks.

Why don't you provide some evidence of your view?

Why have you answered only those who do not ask this of you?

When you have something to contribute to the subject at hand, other than just spouting off for kicks, then maybe it's worth concidering.

Your, at this point, just baiting other people on this thread, which is bad news for everyone.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 16 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 18 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 4 days ago with 77 member flags
Superbowl Halftime Conspiracy!
  Posted 8 days ago with 75 member flags