Subject: No one can sell any ammunition after June 30, 2009, page 2

reply to post by network dude

---

I read 1984 years ago, what's you're point? What? - you think the government is going to turn big brother on you because of the increased cost of ammo?

reply to post by andre18

---

So you just ignore the whole "not helping police investigations" bit altogether, huh?

Also, a problem that should be more than obvious to even the head furthest up the ass, is since when have criminals waltzed into the local shop and bought ammunition?

reply to post by thisguyrighthere

---

I wouldn't waste your thoughts on this person anymore. They are just either mis-directing the thread, or getting off jerking everones chain.

I don't know why, people from other countries feel there opionion matters in the US. They have their own Govt. to worry about.

reply to post by andre18

---

You are from Australia, you already lost your gun rights. You really have nothing to add here.

If you liked being free, you'd know why it is a bad thing for the gov't to track your purchases, whether it's ammo, gold, food, beer or anything else.

reply to post by Wuushu

---

More like welcome to the 1st century.

I can think of lots of countries and dictators that banned their citizens from arms and swords and weapons.

You know for all these "progressive" countries all the policies they enact when it comes to gun control sounds awfully regressive and slavery like.

Progressive would the be government slowly eliminating itself and allowing people to be as free as possible.

Ammo-coding is nothing but the government asserting more control over its citizens.

reply to post by andre18

---

Okay. Typically I seperate freak massacres and the everyday gang-banger but yeah, they got their ammo from Kmart.

Explain how the ammo coding would have stopped the massacre, if you dont mind.

reply to post by andre18

---

"privately held uncoded ammunition must be destroyed by July 1, 2011. (Including hand loaded ammo.)" Is something to think about.

reply to post by moonwilson

---

It's all lawyer speak. They only agree with certain sentences in the constitution that agrees with their agenda. All else they feel can be discarded. I.e. the general welfare clause.

They like the section that says the government must provide for the general well-being of the populace but yet they completely ignore the part that is listed right under that tells them what the government is able to do.

Of course most of these people think that documents are alive too.

Originally posted by downtown436
You are from Australia, you already lost your gun rights. You really have nothing to add here.

I was not aware this was a America only thread......sorry for having an opinion.

Mod Note: General ATS Discussion Etiquette – Please Review This Link.



[edit on 20-3-2009 by mrwupy]

reply to post by moonwilson

---

"One round at a time" That was funny but true! We all expected some sort of reform. Obama is tricky in his methods. What's next?

reply to post by kozmo

---

The codes, that are simply on the boxes, that will require ID is enough for me to react. We should make an ammo run and stock up! Will they come in to my home to destroy my ammo? I'd like to see that. There are other HR laws that could give them this right to take anything they wish.

reply to post by andre18

---

You can add your opinion. This is not an American only thread. It's one step closer to meeting the G20's goals, as well. We have a global problem, beyond economics. It's all indirectly linked.

reply to post by Nventual

---

In America it seems almost every murder is by a gun.

No, that is just the media spin. There are just as many murders by knives and car and rope and all kinds of other things.

The problem with this legislation is that it is my constitutional right to buy a truckload of ammunition if I want.

The fact is that guns or no guns criminals are going to rob, rape, and murder. Why disbar me from protecting myself against a group of thugs if I am by myself.

Further more the 2nd amendment in our constitution is not about hunting it is about overthrowing a government that has become tyrannical.

In the same light how about we start serializing knives and rope and register them while we are it since those are used in crimes too, oh yea and we need to do the same with Duct Tape.

The fact is that all it does is hurt law abiding citizens. Criminals are criminals for a reason, they don't follow the law to begin with.

I'm really dumbfounded at how people honestly think banning guns cuts down on crime rates. All it does is make law abiding people less able to defend themselves and give more opportunity for criminals to commit crimes.

[edit on 20-3-2009 by Hastobemoretolife]

reply to post by Nventual

---

Well it depends on how you look at it. I have my gun to protect my family and what I own. I dont want someone forcing me to destroy my ammo by 2011. It strikes a nerve. Taking away my ammunition may be only the fist step. I'm kind of fond of my ammo supply and plan to keep it.

The Devil\'s Chord: The conspiracy to open the portal of consciousness and mystery of the octave
  Posted 5 days ago with 165 member flags

The Coca Cola Conspiracy: The secret cause for the U.S. obesity epidemic
  Posted 16 days ago with 139 member flags

Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 16 days ago with 122 member flags

The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags

Bank of America DOES NOT accept U.S. DOLLARS as payment on mortgages
  Posted 9 days ago with 85 member flags

Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 18 days ago with 83 member flags

10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 4 days ago with 77 member flags

Superbowl Halftime Conspiracy!
  Posted 8 days ago with 75 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: