It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

MSN debunks the top 10 conspiracies

page: 3
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 13 2009 @ 06:35 PM
link   
but yeah, aside from the Moon thing, which even I don't think was staged, this article actually "debunks" nothing.




posted on Apr, 13 2009 @ 07:02 PM
link   
In the 911 article, they are not using the term "neo-conservative" properly.

This is just another example of fluff and garbage on the internet, meant to be read very casually by cubicle rats.



posted on Apr, 14 2009 @ 01:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by syrinx high priest
there have been movies about skull and bones


They are low on the totem pole. That's why there's been movies about them. Same with the freemasons.

When they make a movie about Bilderberg then you'll have a point.


Originally posted by syrinx high priest
and almost everyone has heard of the NWO


Heard of and believe are two different things. I never claimed no one has heard of the New World Order concept. The point I am making is very few know anything about or can identify the main groups.


Originally posted by syrinx high priest
heck even eminem rapped about it


And? The New World Order concept is not or should not be the primary focus here. It is the groups responsible that should. Did Eminem positively identify any group involved in a 'ruling the world' plot? Even if he did, clearly it had no effect.


Originally posted by syrinx high priest
the point is simply a secret society should be, well, secret


Not when it affects the lives of people outside the society. They lose all right to secrecy when they choose to bring their politics outside the organization.



posted on Apr, 14 2009 @ 04:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns
Now if the Moon was formed from a chunk of the Earth that got blasted away from a major impact, why the hell would they say that rocks on the Moon would be older than rocks on Earth if the Moon is made from elements OF THE EARTH!???

Because the earth is still geologically active. The earth is continually producing younger, newer rocks through volcanism and at places like divergent plate boundaries. Old rocks are digested at places like subduction zones and through any other process by which a rock is melted. The moon is geologically dead, and because of its small size it died out much faster than the earth will, leaving many older rocks behind on its surface. This is evidenced by the large number of visible craters, which could not be processed by geological activity.



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 05:40 AM
link   
Its back again, just reassure all those non believers that there is no real conspiracy and that it really is all your heads. MSN UK
[edit on 3-7-2009 by kode]

[edit on 3-7-2009 by kode]



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 05:54 AM
link   
the number one conspiracy "elite ruling the Earth" has really strong debunking arguments LOL . MSN is really a joke .. i see now why being journalist is not enough to write good quality articles..



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 06:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by ngchunter

Originally posted by RFBurns
Now if the Moon was formed from a chunk of the Earth that got blasted away from a major impact, why the hell would they say that rocks on the Moon would be older than rocks on Earth if the Moon is made from elements OF THE EARTH!???

Because the earth is still geologically active. The earth is continually producing younger, newer rocks through volcanism and at places like divergent plate boundaries. Old rocks are digested at places like subduction zones and through any other process by which a rock is melted. The moon is geologically dead, and because of its small size it died out much faster than the earth will, leaving many older rocks behind on its surface. This is evidenced by the large number of visible craters, which could not be processed by geological activity.


carbon dating proved that the oldest earth rocks are 4.5 billion years old , while some of the moon rocks are 20 billion years !!!!

moon is a alien apaceship ans many russian mathematicans and scientists have stated so that moon gravity behaviour seems to suggest that its hollow or partially hollow .

moon existed before our solar system



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 07:05 AM
link   

September 11


Non-Symmetrical Fire Damage does not cause Symmetrical structural failure.


JFK


Laws of physics indicate that bullets do not change direction in mid air.


Roswell


Yeah, except The army Captain who originally reported a downed alien craft and associated bodies.


Moon Landing


The presumption that the area around the moon landing is littered with debris indicates knowledge that is not possible to posses.

Hubble (Most powerful satellite) does not have the resolution to pick up objects that small on the moon)


AIDS


Yeah, because TPTB Create entirely NEW viruses... instead of engineering pre-existing ones...



Princess Diana


A drunk limo driver is allowed to drive royalty?

Sounds perfectly plausible.



Global Warming


Nice non answer there... technically... Me eating a sandwich is at least PART of the cause of global warming, too.

Continued...

[edit on 3-7-2009 by Edrick]



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 07:06 AM
link   

Lockerbie


Never heard of it... maybe they ran out of "Bunk" to "De"


The Holy Grail


They are debunking movies now?



The Conspiracy


WEll, they didn't even bother trying to debunk that did they?

This article is just... shameful


*Dusts off hands*

We'll, my work here is done.


-Edrick

[edit on 3-7-2009 by Edrick]



posted on Jul, 3 2009 @ 07:17 AM
link   
Just had a read through their top 10.

Sadly, due to ATS rules and regs I'm not allowed to post just this ->



new topics

top topics



 
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join