It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Infinite Paradox
You see, both sides get something out of exchanges such as this. If this were not true then threads such as these would last one page and then disappear into obscurity.
Those that point out the obvious and go on and on about how terrible the OP is for playing such a game should also take pause and realize the ego boost they get out of continuing to state the obvious.
What repeated rationalizations do you use to keep such threads going for 4 pages and where do those come from?
Do you truly feel slighted by people pretending to be hybrids or are you just playing a part as well?
I certainly don't expect anyone to answer such inquires honestly in public because it would ruin the ego charades playing out...
I've played both roles and can firmly say that the observer point is by far the most satisfying.
You see, both sides get something out of exchanges such as this.
If this were not true then threads such as these would last one page and then disappear into obscurity.
Those that point out the obvious and go on and on about how terrible the OP is for playing such a game should also take pause and realize the ego boost they get out of continuing to state the obvious.
There's nothing wrong with that. I'm just saying we each could learn a lot from self observation in regards to our reactions towards certain things. What repeated rationalizations do you use to keep such threads going for 4 pages and where do those come from?
Originally posted by Jennifer07
I am in contact with ET's on a regular basis and have been shown many things since childhood about the majority of what comes here, they have been explained to me in detail as to what purpose they serve. I am sorry for sharing information if it has offended anyone. That was never my intention.
Fourth, to all those who insist that there is nothing to see here, move along, move along... There is good reason to be skeptical, but if we knee-jerk our skepticism, we can do ourselves a good deal of disservice.
We will be leaving via the witch, the surrounding area will be protected, and the date I will disclose soon. Stay tuned!
Anyway, I may be an alien in a human form as I was abducted at an early age. I do not look like a zeta, I look like a human, so I must be a human.
Failing consistency suggests it is bunk, but failing validation merely leaves us as yet unsure.
Originally posted by Beamish
reply to post by Amaterasu
Amaterasu, I realize your post was no directed at me, but I feel compelled to reply to it nevertheless.
Fourth, to all those who insist that there is nothing to see here, move along, move along... There is good reason to be skeptical, but if we knee-jerk our skepticism, we can do ourselves a good deal of disservice.
Why do the skeptics always get the bum’s rush? I find it highly insulting, as if we are the pariahs of ATS. To me, it’s as if the so-called “believers” can’t wait to get rid of anything or anyone that will in anyway spoil their fun.
What is so wrong with having a contrary or alternative opinion? Having one does not mean that the skeptic is necessarily a “disbeliever” rather they are able to observe without any predisposition.
And as you say, in a subjective way, a knee-jerk reaction may be doing us a disservice in rejecting threads like this.
But surely your reactive attitude towards skeptics is the self same thing?
How do you know you won’t gain knowledge from a skeptic?
Or is it that you don’t want to hear anything that doesn’t fit in with your own beliefs?
zeta66 has said ...
Tell me, in all honesty, does that read as the stone cold surety of an individual who knows categorically that they have had contact with, and became part of, an alien species, or is it the ramblings of a media-inspired hoaxer?
You say you are looking for consistency and validation for your beliefs. Do you not realize that that attitude should include different and balancing viewpoints, as if it doesn’t you’ll be open up to all manner of fraudulent information?
Your statement:
Failing consistency suggests it is bunk, but failing validation merely leaves us as yet unsure.
Consistent with what? Your understanding of the phenomena? That might not be necessary if you had an open, and critical mind.
And as zeta66 will never be able to corroborate his story, as it is fake, will this thread leave you with a bitter taste in your mouth or will you still be unsure?
Originally posted by Amaterasu
As for this thread... Meh. Again, you are taking my words to jennifer and redirecting them to the OP.
Originally posted by Beamish
Amaterasu, I realize your post was no directed at me, but I feel compelled to reply to it nevertheless.
Why do the skeptics always get the bum’s rush? I find it highly insulting, as if we are the pariahs of ATS.
How do you know you won’t gain knowledge from a skeptic?
Rather than evaluate the content someone offers, in terms of plausibility, consistency, probability, possibility, and so forth, I see many that seemingly read a few lines and immediately call BS. There is no true skepticism involved. It is more akin to denial.
Or is it that you don’t want to hear anything that doesn’t fit in with your own beliefs?
I couldn't care less what I hear. I evaluate it based on what previous data I have collected and assign probabilities.
Consistent with what? Your understanding of the phenomena? That might not be necessary if you had an open, and critical mind.
Consistency within the data itself. Do they say one thing here, and another, contradictory thing there, for example.
“And as zeta66 will never be able to corroborate his story, as it is fake, will this thread leave you with a bitter taste in your mouth or will you still be unsure?”
BTW, say I am a hoaxer, there are no aliens and nothing happens at the meeting place. We will still have a good time. We will be camping out on miles and miles of US citizen public lands, eating hot-dogs around fires and drinking a few beers.
Why did you feel 'compelled' to respond to something not directed at you? I always wondered about that... this compelling need some have to respond... and then with something that has no bearing on the thread...
Well not ALL skeptics... I find ones like ArMaP, Phage and JRA work very hard to present their side of the case… The skeptics who fit your description are usually those that 'swarm' a thread just to naysay it without doing anything but naysaying it... which is afterall only their opinion..
Originally posted by zorgon
So back on topic...
When these Zeta ships leave... can someone PLEASE get us some good picture?
And use a tri-pod with auto focus lens Thanks
Originally posted by Beamish
reply to post by Amaterasu
zeta66 claims ...
Instant dismissal of claims such as the ones on this thread are completely understandable given that the subject matter is rife with hoaxers, the disassociated, and those who instantly profess, and declare openly, a deep understanding of the subject after reading a few books without having any understanding at all. They are mistaking enthusiasm for knowledge.
How would plausibility in zeta66’s story be defined and in comparison to what? He’s inconsistent.
and you replied
I couldn't care less what I hear. I evaluate it based on what previous data I have collected and assign probabilities.
So you evaluate new information by comparison to the data that you trust. Sorry, but isn’t that exactly the same thing? And isn’t that a loophole that can be easily exploited by hoaxers? Drop in a few familiar phrases and scenarios, maybe an emotion or two, and there’s your “plausible” account.
I said:
(essentially more about zeta)