It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Creation of the universe (with proof)

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 06:55 AM
link   
Hey! im new here and im not sure where this thread should go.
I thought i'd talk about my opinion on creation and put forward some proof i found. Tell me what you think.

First link: www.halos.com...

In the link, it explains that etched within earths rocks -the granites- are beautiful microspheres of coloration, halos, produced by the radioactive decay of primordial polonium, which is known to have only a fleeting existence.

The only way these can actualy be formed is if the earth was instantly cooled and not over thousands or millions of years.

There is a lot of evidence on there, and they have replies from universities and people have sent to them, the evidence hasnt actualy been debunked.

'The Academy Of Science has vehemently opposed creation science, even claiming that the evidence for creation has been scientifically invalidated. We have repeatedly challenged the Academy to publicly explain where the polonium-halo evidence for creation has ever been scientifically invalidated. For over 15 years, they have refused to even try, for they know that their statement is insupportable when it comes to the polonium-halo evidence.'

That was a quote from one of them.

Next link! www.orionfdn.org...

In this link, there are documents that show the flaws in the big bang, completely dissproving it. Scientists against these papers had them repeatdly removed in the past, and after a law suit they are back up on this site (evidence for that is also on the site). I understand the more basic parts of these papers, but for those of you that understand the mathamatics and things should take a look.

Anyway! i can put up more links if people want.
lets hear what you think!

[edit on 19-3-2009 by Redfield]

[edit on 19-3-2009 by Redfield]




posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 08:25 AM
link   
Makes me think of this:

Luke 19:40 (New King James Version)

40 But He answered and said to them, “I tell you that if these should keep silent, the stones would immediately cry out.”



posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 08:36 AM
link   
Welcome...

As I am at work I cannot link off to the information...what caused the instantaneous cooling of the Earth to cause these crystalline deposits? I am somewhat interested in explanations for some of some of the discrepancies in the proposed timeline of the Earth...


We'll see what the educated have to say about it...and the others too.



posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 08:56 AM
link   
Your thread should be moved to: ORIGINS & CREATIONISM CONSPIRACY
I can't do it for you. You need to ask one of the mods which are named at the bottom of the page.

I like the analogy used (on that web site) to demonstrate what polonium halo's are and how they are formed.

It's ironic that polonium halos in granite turns the ground on which the evolutionist stands into "sinking sand", while providing the creationist with "solid bedrock" to stand on.



posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 09:04 AM
link   
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.

Gentry's work on polonium halos has been disputed a number of times and in a number of ways. I'll provide one link that does it fairly succinctly, but a cursory search will reveal plenty more.

Basically, there are some serious flaws in his methodology that causes some erroneous conclusions.

Check out Tiny Mystery.


As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.



posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 11:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by yeahright
Gentry's work on polonium halos has been disputed a number of times and in a number of ways. I'll provide one link that does it fairly succinctly, but a cursory search will reveal plenty more.

Basically, there are some serious flaws in his methodology that causes some erroneous conclusions.

Check out Tiny Mystery.




I looked at the link, but it still does not explain the halos found in rock that do not have pegmatite dikes.

As a different post i want to talk about some of the flaws ive found in evolution.
As far as i know they say that life came from this planet from...something...that means that something must have the information to create different types of cells that can duplicate itself. Its like getting blood from a rock for example.
Evolutionists say that one day an animal gave birth to something that was different to its self that then started to grow legs (for an example)
but that would mean the whole of its species must give birth to the same thing with the right genetic code. Animals and humans give birth all the time, yet it does not create anything different. It is observable and can be repeatdly studied.
Ask yourself this, do you believe that one day your computer evolved from something? that a simple part created something vastly more complicated than what it is and get it to work?
To me it is the same with humans, a scientific fact is that an ape has thousands of differences to a human, change 3 of them and the ape will die.

[edit on 19-3-2009 by Redfield]

[edit on 19-3-2009 by Redfield]

[edit on 19-3-2009 by Redfield]



posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 11:38 AM
link   
reply to post by Redfield
 


Check here for the discussion of crystal sizes and pegmatite dikes.

I'll let you be the judge about whether or not it's addressed to your satisfaction.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join