reply to post by Zelong
Sorry Zelong, I wasn't trying to sell you any books, just gave links to my sources which I most certainly should have in my orignal post. Let me
please explain why I didn't and why one should *always* use the external links tags and proper HTML tags. You never know when one of your threads may
strike a nerve and generate some attention. This isn't directed at you but, to everyone.
I've made many threads which I deemed important information; NanoTech in our food ect which maybe got one or two posts and then went into the ATS
ether. I had formatted these threads in the correct fashion with the external source tag and link to my source. I was quite okay with the fact they
fell to the way side.
The other night while in a another thread talking about NASA cover ups I had mentioned that I had a book with some intriguing quotes from the Apollo
missions. Another member asked me to please post these; I felt it was off topic in that particular thread so started a new one. I honestly thought it
would be like all my other threads and I did not take the time to properly format the thread. Also, I did not copy and paste per se; I actually hand
typed the information lol I know that's just semantics and is the same as copy and pasteing but, isn't that what we do with all of our breaking
news source information? Point being, I had no nefarious intentions. I was up all night making my posts, took a little nap, came back to ATS and BAM!
I question the validity of Maximillien de Lafayette. In all honesty the price of the books and the fact they are published and distributed by
amazon.com; the fact the guy puts out a book a month seems suspect to me. There is a discussion about him on ATS
Phage has a point that anything taken out of context can be misconstrued. The main source of information in the de Lafayette book is Don Wilson,
writer of "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon." This book has been referenced by the revered Jim Marrs who I consider to be an awesome journalist
::again with the pom poms::. I, for one, believe Don Wilson to be a legitiment writer and a real person who did some great investigative journalisim
and then had his book taken off the market. I can't say the same for de Lafayette, I have yet to find a picture of this man and believe he could be
search engine. His books have a strange format, bad editting and take bits and pieces of information. ***Important - this does not negate the work of
Don Wilson. I'm just having an honest disclosure of my views of de Lafayette.
Now, I'd like to propose a question about the Don Wilson book. Why is this out of print? Why are the *paperback* versions so expensive ($120 on
amazon)? I've got a rare hardback, first edition of a collection of poems from Jim Morrison that doesn't even sell this high. Just a point of
Regarding this thread here are my opinions. Did the Apollo missions come across aliens or some dimensional beings? Possibly - it was the first manned
space mission of any consequence. Is the moon actually an alien ship of it's own? Possibly - what's with the reported resonance of 'ringing' like
a bell indicating a hollowness? Correct me if I'm wrong, and I know you will ::smile::, isn't there now some evidence to suggest the moon is a lot
older then the earth? Is NASA engaged in some cover ups? In this members opinion - without a doubt. As to what they are covering up...I can't say for
certain. We need honest disclosure from our government. I think the citizens of the world can deal with the implications. They've been preparing us
for forty years with books, movies, tv shows - we are ready!
Thanks for taking the time to read this post. I just felt it necessary to state the origins of this thread and to admit the preping mistakes I made in
the OP. I failed myself and the ATS community on this one. In other threads I've made the appropriate html links and source documentations. Along
with this admittance, I will attest I don't think it changes the validity of the information whatsoever. It was bad prep work on my end but, I typed
the quotes word for word without personal interjection or embellishment.
I also apologize for my previous outburst. I still think the moderator, who I've now been told was posting as a member not a mod, should have used
that boarder disclaimer. In my experience on ATS, true hoaxers don't take the time to set up a profile - they make their claims on their very first
thread. I've been viewing this sight for years and have been contributing as a member for awhile. I just felt as if the moderator in question was
making a direct attack upon my reputation and as anyone with any self respect would, I needed to clairfy my motivations and intent.
Final note: always use external source tags, html links to source. And don't thread if you can't take the heat.
And notably, I focused on the 2%
of meanies and not the 98% who supported me, if not directly they were respectful with rebuttables. Some important lessons learned by this ATS member.