It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by converge
Didn't you forget an 's' in President?
No, I didn't.
What other President signed this current bill which allowed for the bonuses?
Originally posted by converge
The bailout didn't start on January 20th 2009.
If you don't think President Bush and his Administration share the blame for this as well, then you don't have your history straight.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Sorry if I missed someone else posting this.
The other troubling thing about the AIG bailout is that AIG runs the (democrat-controlled) congress's pension fund.
So you see? The democrat-controlled congress HAD to bail out AIG.
Originally posted by Common Good
Not poor Barrack, poor people who voted for him. I feel sorry they put all their trust in a guy who cant even keep a simple political scam hidden from the public. Its like watching a movie on HBo with a lowsy ass actor portraying the President. kick him to the curb.
Originally posted by Merriman Weir
This shouldn't be a party or partisan issue. As sickening at it is, this kind of thing is endemic in politics generally. No party is actually clean in this, in whatever country it is and whatever political/economic system those countries run.
The sad reality is that very, very few people enter politics for wholly altruistic reasons, no matter where they stand on a political compass. You can always tell where a politician's heart really lies with how their nest gets feathered: the 'consultancy' work they do after office, the firms they become directors of and so on.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Good grief! You cannot come to grips with the fact that this is squarely on the shoulders of the current Congress and Administration.
So NO, I don't think Bush is to blame for this current bailout bill which allowed for the bonuses. Did Bush sign this bill? Answer: No. Enough said.
Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson said that while he was upset with the levels of salary afforded to top executives, any cap on such would dissuade companies from participating in the TARP.
"If we design it so it's punitive and so institutions aren't going to participate, this won't work the way we need it to work," he told Fox News Sunday on September 21.
Senator Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, told CBS news that: "It should be up to the board of directors of a private corporation to set the compensation of an executive; it shouldn't be Congress's role."
Senator Mel Martinez told CNBC that: "While it is very appealing to think about executive compensation as being a part of this, one of the drawbacks to that is perhaps that we would have fewer entities participate in what is essentially a voluntary act."
And House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, "outraged" over AIG's issuance of $165 million in bonuses, said he was not in favor of "the federal government be[ing] able to set salaries across the board," when the issue of executive compensation arose in September 2008.
When are you going to stop blaming Bush and start putting the blame where it is due which is the current Congress and President.
Stop the revisionist history please.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Well this does explain a lot. No wonder Obama wanted to save AIG while letting other big institutions fail. Apparently this entire AIG bailout is nothing but payback for the campaign contributions.
I'm sure the main stream media will not cover this angle because it would portray Obama and top Dem's in a bad light.
www.examiner.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by Loke.
think you should try and see how many money Blackwater has given GwB,Cheney and the rest of that crmininal group.
Best regards.
Loke.