It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Last Man on Earth
reply to post by sos37
Great arguments, but deep down, you know he did. Does he look at all sympathetic that he ordered an invasion that resulted in the complete breakdown of Iraqi society, so what Shia death squads are running around, collecting Sunni men and raping then executing them?
No, he looks like a man who sleeps soundly on a big pile of money while his countrymen scratch their arses and then put their fingers to their nose for a sniff.
Originally posted by djvexd
So does that mean that any country's leaders that sided with him and sent troops and intelligence assets to participate in this "atrocity" should be labeled as such as well? Better line up Britian, Canada, France, Poland...etc. etc. I can tell you at the Hague during WW2 just following orders wasn't a defense.
Originally posted by sos37
1. How does one man who is not in the most powerful position in America start a war all by himself based on false information? Congress had the same intelligence info that Bush had when they made that decision together. Can you prove that the error on WMDs didn't come from the CIA and other members of the intelligence community? Can you prove that Bush purposefully manipulated the data or had the data manipulated?
The answer is no you can't and no you can't.
Originally posted by justsomeboreddude
He had grounds to start the war. Iraq was in violation of its peace treaty.
I dont know if it can be proven that he sanctioned torture. I guess it depends on the definition of torture
He didnt ruin the economy. The economy was wrecked by derivatives, the housing market, and a country full of people that want the government to wipe their buts for them. Plus a bunch of congressman who will offer to do it for just one more vote.
He didnt cause 911. It was caused by Osama Bin Laden and his band of merry men.
Originally posted by Johnmike
Good thing Canada is showing some class.
Originally posted by sos37Uh no sir, when I say No he didn't I mean "NO HE DIDN'T". That's what I mean and believe deep down.
Originally posted by sos37That's not to say he didn't have a hand in these things, but he is not SOLELY to blame for the things spoken about. Perhaps if you have all the answers you can explain the following:
Originally posted by sos37Keep in mind POTUS is not the most powerful position in the US government, Congress is.
Originally posted by sos371. How does one man who is not in the most powerful position in America start a war all by himself based on false informatio.... manipulated?
The answer is no you can't and no you can't.
Originally posted by sos372. How does one man who is not in the most powerful position in America destroy the most powerful economy in the world all by himself? Dereg... they couldn't normally afford - with NO MONEY DOWN??? No, I think he didn't.
The answer is no, he didn't do it on his own.
Originally posted by sos373. The 9/11 "inside job" conspiracy - please. I'm not even going to waste time on that crap.
Originally posted by sos37Does that mean Bush didn't make mistakes? No, it doesn't. Of course Bush made mistakes and I think he's partly responsible for all of the things mentioned above.
Originally posted by sos37But remember something - you guys are quick to say that Barack Obama is nothing but a puppet for the real powers that be and his strings are just being pulled. So what makes Obama different from Bush in that regard?
Originally posted by sos37I think the very same was true with Bush! I think he was also a puppet for the real overseers of our government, the real people that make the decisions - the faceless men with their hands on all the money and power who sit silently in the background.
Originally posted by wonderworld
reply to post by Albertarocks
Are there any external media links. I would like to see Bush dodging Canadian shoes. Any video clips?