It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by BluegrassRevolutionary
Again, my posts are meant to illustrate that two of the major arguments put forth (protection against the government and assault weapons having a purpose other than killing people) are quite unrealistic.
So you're telling me that my 3-gun comps dont exist or are unrealistic or what?
Originally posted by spec_ops_wannabe
Come on people, flag this and get some discussion going.
A minute is all the time that it takes for an employee in one of almost 7,000 gun shops dotting the U.S./Mexico border to accept a wad of cash from an eager customer, fill out a triplicate sales slip, and slide a nice, new Taurus .45 caliber pistol across the counter. Or two, or three, or twenty, as the case may be. Add those handguns to the countless tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of pistols, sniper and assault rifles, semi-automatic machine guns, shield-piercing bullets, grenades, plastic explosives, as well as anti-tank weapons outfitted with self-propelling rockets passing illegally through the hands of drug cartel foot soldiers and assassins.
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
reply to post by BluegrassRevolutionary
You are assuming the military would go through with such a thing.
You should read this..
oath-keepers.blogspot.com...
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Well..not to play devil's advocate or anything (actually I look forward to it) but why do civilians need automatic and semi-automatic weapons?
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Well..not to play devil's advocate or anything (actually I look forward to it) but why do civilians need automatic and semi-automatic weapons?
Non sequitur. It's not about someone saying what one needs or doesn't. Civilians (citizens actually) are entitled to own any stuff they want to, period. Prohibitions are opression.
I'll meet you on reasonable terms with malum in se and where living creatures are involved however.
Originally posted by BluegrassRevolutionary
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by BluegrassRevolutionary
Again, my posts are meant to illustrate that two of the major arguments put forth (protection against the government and assault weapons having a purpose other than killing people) are quite unrealistic.
So you're telling me that my 3-gun comps dont exist or are unrealistic or what?
I am not sure I understand what you mean by "3-gun comps." Please elaborate on your question.
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
reply to post by BluegrassRevolutionary
Well the way I see it is our military and especially retired military would be part of the armed resistance. As a 'potentially' armed citizen arming myself to defend against an oppressive government, hypothetically I am not going to march down to the local military base, I will be marching on capital hill clean out the tyrannical trash. Chances are there will be a few current and retired military personnel along side me and my gun-owning neighbors.
Originally posted by BluegrassRevolutionary
However, if your movement were non-violent and un-armed, the government will be unable to meet your movement with violence and be forced recognize your frustrations.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by BluegrassRevolutionary
However, if your movement were non-violent and un-armed, the government will be unable to meet your movement with violence and be forced recognize your frustrations.
Right. Like those monks in Burma.
[edit on 18-3-2009 by thisguyrighthere]
Originally posted by BluegrassRevolutionary
Hey, don't roll your eyes at me. lol
Well, what about Ghandi's non-violent resistance to the British military in India?
I never said that this action was foolproof, however, I still stand by my statement that an armed resistance will only serve to justify the government in their actions and only work to hurt your cause.
"Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest." -- Mahatma Gandhi