*Warning* This is a Rant. This is only a Rant. (alcohol *or thread avoidance* reccomended)

page: 1
1

log in

join

posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 03:52 PM
link   
Thoughts on thread: TimeWave Zero

I'll guess real quick so you can maybe go "Ohhh..." when it maybe gets here and then jump on board in Aussie with the real version of the fix.

A heartfelt guesstimation?...
Coming up, it may have been 2011, and you may know better than I; and after a series of events the magnetism of the Earth is going to be shifted enough thanks to those booster rockets around the Earth to enable a *temporary* shift in the dimensional reality. It won't be catastropic and the Jesuits will beam right on down to straiten out their discrepancy.

Peoples alien dna will activate, the dudes down at the tree of life will pop up, 'market place/casino' Earth will run for 6 months-not more than a handful of people really *die*; things like that-some minor things; maybe a brief mock invasion from the praying mantis people.

And then it will go back to normal. Don't worry, life on Earth does not totally end until 3032ish...

At which point a *small* group of people will be operating out of a facility about 5-20 miles in from the Eastern coast of Austrailia, chasing "issues" on hundreds of timelines whilst they try to figure it out-whatever the big 'it' is.

Two of their 'trusted' members-there from the beginning of this whole 'fix Earth, whoops, shortened it's life span by 3,000' crew will continue on their merry way ... things up, up to and including a total implosion of the Universe to which some higher force unblips it and places that member back to where he had left to go one and carry out his days.

So. The world IS capable of being 'rescued'--it just doesn't really benifit the many either way within their lifespans. Which is just really where I personally am swimming the 40 helpless to change it or speak; bordering on despondancy and panic; resolved to the status.

As history repeats itself in forward of my eyes as some type of helpless joke that the higher ups really are not aware of until later.. being so high up and all.

And I'm pissed about it, because it's not a good fix; it was a faulty fix from the beginning.

The team didn't know, can't see what is done outside of their vision of view. Can't say anything or they will be misblamed. Tired of seeing harm.

And he is taunting me the sob; programs someone to jump off a building-rushes in as a member of the engineer team, while he plans the explosion of the complex.

It's my favorite building too. I love this place. Those people will die. Higher ups won't trace it to him. It's not like they are going to come back and undo it. Acting like he's the fixer of the problem, while he races in to fix a creation of his own planning.

When the space Jesuits believe that sort of thing-Huston we have a problem...not like they are going to publicize hyjackings of thier space shuttles, skylabs, satelites-or anything.

sound familiar?

I did not think so.
I mean...
The Earth is not really going to end. end.
Death is but a simple transition--to life again.
But if we are going to sit here and try to 'figure out...... we have got to evolve to the point where..

well, disclosure really is necessary. I don't believe anyone really had the right to bend the religion complex to suit their wants and needs for points or obiesiance.

[edit on 17-3-2009 by HugmyRek]

[edit on 17-3-2009 by HugmyRek]




posted on Mar, 18 2009 @ 07:11 AM
link   
If only we had discovered the code a little earlier and then actually knew what to do with it once we had it. All endeavours to fix what we don't understand will inevitably lead faulty fixes and knots we can't undo. If the essence of the now is to be changed, the past must be changed...but the past can't be changed because subsequently our now will no longer exist. The only option available then is 'parallel reality overlay' - where portions of the in-phase & anti-phase waveform outputs of each universe are combined to create a new and desirable reality where life is good & humanity survives........or at least that's the gist of it.

"Nature builds on previously established levels of complexity." (quote from T. McKenna). That's true for the universe, that's true for nature, that's true for us - and I suppose that's true for time (and any code embedded within any of the above). So that pretty much leaves us in the dark if we're going to try and fix something so complex when only working with the upper levels of the complexity - perhaps we either should start at the bottom, or maybe try keeping it simple. Maybe starting at the bottom is keeping it simple, like sitting back and hoping for a successful fix - or at the very least thinking positively on the issue...not losing hope and not losing sight of the positive outcomes we desire when approaching 'it' -- whatever that may be.

And are we approaching it, or is it approaching us? We think time shoves us forward, but maybe the future's chasing us.



posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Evasius
If only we had discovered the code a little earlier and then actually knew what to do with it once we had it. All endeavours to fix what we don't understand will inevitably lead faulty fixes and knots we can't undo. If the essence of the now is to be changed, the past must be changed...but the past can't be changed because subsequently our now will no longer exist. The only option available then is 'parallel reality overlay' - where portions of the in-phase & anti-phase waveform outputs of each universe are combined to create a new and desirable reality where life is good & humanity survives........or at least that's the gist of it.

"Nature builds on previously established levels of complexity." (quote from T. McKenna). That's true for the universe, that's true for nature, that's true for us - and I suppose that's true for time (and any code embedded within any of the above). So that pretty much leaves us in the dark if we're going to try and fix something so complex when only working with the upper levels of the complexity - perhaps we either should start at the bottom, or maybe try keeping it simple. Maybe starting at the bottom is keeping it simple, like sitting back and hoping for a successful fix - or at the very least thinking positively on the issue...not losing hope and not losing sight of the positive outcomes we desire when approaching 'it' -- whatever that may be.

And are we approaching it, or is it approaching us? We think time shoves us forward, but maybe the future's chasing us.

No, you can go strait back and change things that make differences in the current present on the same time line. The difference is with the documentation of history. The onset of 'media'; the creation of the camera; the changing of ink and the onset of pressed papers.

It's like the criminal database system in the US. The police departments were not even connected; no one knew where anyone was, but they all wanted thier guy..
Now they are all a 'little' more connected and people are going, 'ah...there you are!'

So maybe someone went back and instead of just making sure the jews died in concentration camps-made certain that they starved first before being gased. Maybe it's an overlay...created when that occurrance occurred; like you said (?)

Someone would have to be able to go back and 'see' and know where to look to even begin to address a fix on those who went back knowing where to look not knowing what they've done.

Round about just prior to the space shuttle explosion that killed the first female American teacher in space, all of a sudden everybody was interested in the holocast subject and looking for source on it--so who would notice that there was a change that arrived from the future of a former past affecting this present, if that past became this present from what it was initially; because of that change. How would no one not notice this present occurred from where it had not been?

And why would so many people in the eventually arriving future of that past be so aware at the same time that something strangely supernatural had occurred in a past in which they did not participate/stem from-or have so much interest placed in that spot, as, wars and things occur and occur, yet, some...just stick to people while others are barely glanced upon?

And how is it that multiple changes would arrive to the same future/present if each change makes it's own timeline?

And why: While travelling in a gray's craft through time a clone is not replicated by the universe upon the same timeline, while

While travelling in a GE one is depending upon variables. And while while

travelling in the montauk tubes one is not; And while

travelling in the little peoples time equipped ship one is not. And while

travelling in the recorder one is not. And while

travelling in the ship from the European alliances one is not.

And while travelling in American MIB cars one is not.

And while travelling through black portals one is not.

And why is the MJ12 disclosure thingy on the Gov Secrets podcast saying some far future race from another time line needs to do work here so as to make their future more pleasant--meanwhile ours is spinning to oblivion maybe. Could we be being sacrificed so these people can have a nicer cup of tea?




posted on Mar, 28 2009 @ 11:18 PM
link   
you did say something about alcohol, right? because I just read this twice, and I still don't get it! kind of like... :bnghd:

or maybe I just need this...


seriously though, the universe tends to disorder... entropy increases

kind of reminds me of this thread

but order arises from chaos

so without entropy, no order

aha!

*going to read it again*






new topics
 
1

log in

join