American Legion Strongly Opposes President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes for Treatment, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 10:25 AM by jdub297
Originally posted by mf_luder
reply to
post by jimmyx



Out of the three things you just said, the only one I can verify at this time is the fact that yes, he is pulling troops out of Iraq.


As far as I know, Hussein Obama has "promised" to bring troops back. I don't know of any yet who constitute a RIF rather than a rotation.

A "pledge" of funding is worth about the paper it is written on as far as BHO is concerned.

Same for "family benefits."

I've yet to see Obama DO something for our soldiers and sailors.

Am I missing something?

jw


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 10:29 AM by jimmyx
Originally posted by mf_luder
reply to
post by jimmyx



Oh for the love of God.......

Can you PLEASE show me where I said "Democrats are screwing the Soldiers"?

Please?

Just once?

For me?


what? i never said that about you...but there are republicans that IMPLY that and i have seen them all over ATS...jesus, we're all americans and that is how we should think of each other



reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 10:37 AM by jdub297
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to
post by disgustedbyhumanity



It doesn't matter if they will have to dip into their own pockets or not. The amount of money that this will raise is paltry, and even ASKING them to reimburse the VA for their treatment is pathetic and ridiculous. These soldiers are risking everything for their country, and even ASKING them to do this is an insult.


Nor does it make sense. Why should one government-funded health care program have to seek reimbursement from another?

Would there even be a need for a VA?

Until Obama actually enacts one (remember Clinton's? Where is it?), thank God for the VA, as pitiful as it is.

jw


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 10:49 AM by Zaphod58
reply to post by jimmyx



As it should be. This plan should go away, quietly, or loudly, it should just go away. Reimbursing for NON-service related injuries and illnesses is one thing. I realize that the VA does this, and that it is put back into the VA. I have no problem with that. But service related injuries and illnesses are something completely different.


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 10:54 AM by disgustedbyhumanity
reply to post by Zaphod58



In thelink I posted above it clearly says that the VA recieved over $2 billion from private insurance companies last year. So you are wrong. I don't think any vet takes it as an insult. They just care that they get the care they need. And under the old or proposed rules that will not change and it will not mean a penny out of any soldiers wallet.

Soldiers do not need protection in this debate as they are not being harmed or discriminated against in any way by Obama proposal. For the record I am not for or against this proposal, but I can't stand for you people to infer things that are not true in order to make your points.

Is not one of you human enough to admit that you read this wrong and that this is not a proposal against america's soldiers? This proposal will have no effect on the finances or health care that veterans recieve. It is between the insurance companies and the VA.


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 10:57 AM by jimmyx
Originally posted by mf_luder
reply to
post by jimmyx



Then why don't you start?


start what? you know...your going to believe that obama and the democrats are against the soldiers and the military, no matter what i say.
the military families will be helped, and you will have to hear it from them personally before you believe it. and that's where i'm going to leave it, i'm done.


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 11:11 AM by sickofitall2012
reply to post by disgustedbyhumanity



Don't you understand that by forcing insurance companies to reimburse the VA, that all our health care premiums will be raised to such a level that it will force the system to fail and that will in turn force us to accept socialized medicine?



reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 11:26 AM by Swatman
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by mf_luder
reply to
post by jdub297



Not surprised to see no replies to this yet.

Come on ATS.

Where are you now?

Can't give 5 million stars and 1555 flags to this one because this doesn't fit in with your "the military is evil" mindset?

Can we really let this happen?

Yeah.

The great change of the nation.

Obama.

God I hope the Zombies show up soon.


well here's an article about how much the republicans cared about veterans in 2005

www.politicalaffairs.net...




good job posting from a socialist/marxist website that pretty much denies truth to news.


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 11:27 AM by Zaphod58
reply to post by disgustedbyhumanity



For NON-SERVICE RELATED TREATMENT. I have no problem with that. Service related treatment should not be billed to any insurance company or to anyone.

If this is no big deal why is the American Legion so against it?

[edit on 3/17/2009 by Zaphod58]


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 11:38 AM by disgustedbyhumanity
reply to post by sickofitall2012



Don't you realize that if private insurers don't pay then we pay with taxes. We pay both ways.

As for socialized health care, I would prefer that, rather than be gouged by doctors and insurance companies. But on that point , I just want to make it clear that Obama's health care plan is not socialized medicine. The health care you recieve will still be provided by the same doctors, hmo's, etc you use now. Only difference is the goverment will control payments to make sure that we are not getting gouged and recieve the treatment we deserve. By including a large class of insured then health care premiums will fall. Everyone will have the right to opt out and pay for whatever type of health care they choose.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^