|
|
Topic started on 16-3-2009 @ 02:07 PM by on_yur_6
|
Chief justice accepts 'Obama eligibility' petition
www.worldnetdaily.com
 A California attorney lobbying the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of Barack Obama's qualifications to be president confronted the chief
justice yesterday with legal briefs and a WND petition bearing names of over 325,000 people asking the court to rule on whether or not the sitting
president fulfills the Constitution's "natural-born citizen" clause.
According to Taitz, Roberts approached the microphone and said, "I see you have papers. I promise you I will read all your papers, I will review them.
Please give them to my Secret Service and I will review all of them." (visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Breaking Political News topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 02:07 PM by on_yur_6
|
OK here we go again. What really blows me away with this article is the cover-up in the Supreme Court to prevent this case from being properly
reviewed. Taitz had the intestinal fortitude to stand up and challenge the Chief Justice in front of everyone and called out the wrong doing in his
office.
The list of cases dismissed is a mile long at the bottom of the article. Which just shows a broader conspiracy to me. All of you who think what
Obama produced is a legal document are wrong. The fact that Hawaii has sealed it's records on this case and prevented anyone from seeing the proper
records just confirms a massive cover-up.
We don't need to rehash the faked document produced by Obama. There are other threads for that. Instead, what do you think of the cover-up in the
Supreme Court office striking this case from the dockett? How is it even possible that the approximately 17 cases surrounding Obama's elgibility were
not properly heard and dismissed all across the nation?
I think the powers that be are scared to death at what might happen if the truth gets out.
www.worldnetdaily.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 02:37 PM by Aermacchi
|
This isn't exactly "breaking news" and you may want to check if the thread already exists because IT DOES.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 02:47 PM by Frankidealist35
|
This is world net DAILY. Come on...
They're known for their hoaxes.
Come on people...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 03:05 PM by on_yur_6
|
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
This is world net DAILY. Come on...
They're known for their hoaxes.
Come on people...
I disagree totally. Show me proof of one of their hoaxes.
I'm sure you just discredit WND because it is Christain and conservative.
What do you believe is false in this article? That Justice Roberts was not presented this material and that the case was removed by a staffer?
What are the odds that every single court won't touch this subject with a mile long pole? Are you saying that the list of cases at the end of the
article is false?
[edit on 16-3-2009 by on_yur_6]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 03:07 PM by Frankidealist35
|
reply to post by on_yur_6
Maybe they're not hoaxes per say but they like to spin their news a lot. I'm sure you go there a lot so you would know that.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 03:09 PM by on_yur_6
|
Originally posted by Aermacchi
This isn't exactly "breaking news" and you may want to check if the thread already exists because IT DOES.
Maybe you didn't read the whole article and just the headlline? Everyone knows that the Supreme Court turned down hearing anything about Obama's
elgiblity. This is a March 14th article about the Chief Justice being confronted about the cover-up in his office.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 03:11 PM by on_yur_6
|
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
reply to post by on_yur_6
Maybe they're not hoaxes per say but they like to spin their news a lot. I'm sure you go there a lot so you would know that.
Well at least you're not calling them outright liars with no proof anymore. How many websites, radio stations, or television stations don't spin
information?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 03:16 PM by Gregarious
|
There have been many rather intelligent people saying BO is an illegal alien from Kenya. I want to clarify, clear up, that matter. He is straight from
HELL.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 03:39 PM by on_yur_6
|
reply to post by Gregarious
Well I've never seen so much harm done to this country. It's amazing how this country is being "reformed". Well, all of the "change" lemmings
are getting what they wanted.
But back on topic, why seal the records in Hawaii if there was nothing to hide?
Do you think the Chief Justice will now present this case to the rest of the Court now that some light has been shed on the behind the scenes cover-up
by his staffers?
Or will it just fall on deaf ears once again as the fat and lazy masses turn on American Idol and give up our country to the Socialists?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 04:45 PM by Aermacchi
|
Originally posted by on_yur_6
Originally posted by Aermacchi
This isn't exactly "breaking news" and you may want to check if the thread already exists because IT DOES.
Maybe you didn't read the whole article and just the headlline? Everyone knows that the Supreme Court turned down hearing anything about Obama's
elgiblity. This is a March 14th article about the Chief Justice being confronted about the cover-up in his office.
Yeah I know, I was there when I read it.
www.abovetopsecret.com...'
|
copyright & usage
|
 |