It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by platosallegory
So we can examine the evidence while also pointing out how pseudo or bogus skepticism stands in the way of good evidence.
Discussions of "pseudo skepticism" and "bogus skepticism" are quite insidious. It is an attempt to marginalize every skeptic by redefining who is a skeptic and what a skeptic is allowed to do. It seeks to rob all skeptics of the ability to have opinions or draw conclusions by declaring that only believers have that luxury or right. In fact, they redefine the believers as the "true" skeptics, allowing them to dismiss anyone who holds an opposing viewpoint as a "false" skeptic. Instead of focusing on the argument, they focus on the person making it.
Again, right on. There is no Grand Unified Theory of Skepticism in regards to the UFO phenomenon. Each case must be examined on a case-by-case basis, because we could one day find the one case that shows extraterrestrials are indeed visiting the planet.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Each case must be weighed within reason and that's my point.
Originally posted by platosallegory
The skeptic does not weigh the evidence when it comes to ufology because they want all possibilities to be equal.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
That is a fallacious argument. To those who are hunting the "bogus" or "pseudo" skeptic, it is a rare skeptic who escapes such labels
Please, give us one example among those who are unconvinced of extraterrestrial visitation that you consider to be a "real skeptic."
Point them out. Point to the thread(s) where skeptics gather en mass to ridicule and mock believers; this particular activity is endemic only to the believers.
Originally posted by nerbot
Skeptics eh, aren't we just a pain!
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by SaviorComplex
Might be, but he usually opens his threads telling me to stay out of them
I think it's because I upset him or something...
Originally posted by Malcram
Not really, I presented an argument. There's a difference.
then the inevitable conclusion would be that there are ET Piloted craft in our skies.
In my experience, there are quite a few 'Bogus Skeptics' who sincerely believe they are truly rational skeptics, simply because they are unaware of the degree to which their thinking process is compromised by their bias because, if it's fully institutionalized, as racism was at one time, then few will even identify it as bias.
I will say that I think it's impossible to be fully open-minded and fully aware of the complete range and weight of evidence and still remain a skeptic of the idea that SOME UFO's are ET piloted craft.
Originally posted by spiritualevolution
very sooon we will have all the proof we need
Originally posted by spiritualevolution
very sooon we will have all the proof we need
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by spiritualevolution
Oh look who has shown up!
Imagine seeing you here, posting the same rubbish.
better make the most of it before you get banned again.