It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to post by akalepos
Essentially I agree with what you are saying. However, if you think about it, the point you make can be applied to many things which society and the scientific community accepts as "true" or "fact", and yet they find a way past that problem. They do not refrain from reaching conclusions.
[edit on 19-3-2009 by Malcram]
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to post by akalepos
Careful in recommending me books Akalepos.
A little education and I might be dangerous
Originally posted by Heike
Shouldn't the standard for evidence/proof for aliens/extraterrestrials be the same as for other more or less similar phenomena? I apologize in advance to anyone who may be offended by my lumping UFO's together with ghosts, cryptozoology, and other paranormal phenomena .. but that's more or less where they belong whether you like it or not.
The existence of the giant squid, which is fairly mundane compared to ET's visiting Earth, was not generally accepted until we had a body that could be examined, dissected, tested, etc.
We have pictures, video, and EVP recordings of ghosts which are at least as good or "convincing" as the evidence for aliens, and yet the existence of ghosts is not yet generally accepted, either.
Obviously there is something going on .. all the people who see UFO's and/or ET's are not crazy (myself included). BUT .. what they are and where they're from won't be accepted until we have physical evidence.
Show me a body or body part, a piece of a craft made of something not found on Earth, some alien DNA, or some tangible, physical evidence other than pictures, videos, personal accounts, and "trace" evidence such as burnt grass.
Otherwise, the "evidence" for ET's and their craft is no more compelling than the cold spots, EMF readings, photos, videos, and personal accounts regarding the existence of ghosts.
If you disagree, please tell me why the standard for evidence of ET should be different than the standard for proving any other relatively rare phenomena which doesn't have physical evidence?
math.ucr.edu...
What is Dark Matter? This is the open question. There are many possibilities, and nobody really knows much about this yet. Here are a few of the many published suggestions, which are being currently hunted for by experimentalists all over the world. Remember, you need at least one baryonic candidate and one non-baryonic candidate to make everything work out, so there there may be more than one correct choice among the possibilities given here.
The long and short of it is that Dark Energy - as conceived by our modern physicists - is a fanciful notion that would bring a Mona Lisa smile even to Einstein's lips. There is no proof that it exists, but it must exist...
Therefore, by adding a fifth dimension to the universe, the same equations that apply to electromagnetism could also apply to gravity. It was later shown that not only is one additional dimension required for this link to be solidified, but six more dimensions. Even further down the road, it was discovered that the formulas used to determine this number (which are actually mathematical methods of approximation, since the actual formulas are unknown) we slightly off, resulting in yet another necessary dimension. Therefore, our three physical dimensions plus one time dimension plus seven additional dimensions results in there being eleven dimensions!
www.dailygalaxy.com...
"This is simply a way of trusting strictly the fundamental equations of quantum mechanics," says Barrau. "The worlds are not spatially separated, but exist as kinds of 'parallel' universes."
The extraterrestrial hypothesis is no different. It is not falsifiable. It does require extraordinary evidence to be proven.