It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
When he asked if we thought the ETH was the best explanation for UFOs and we all responded "no, but still a possibility," he said we were saying it wasn't a possibility at all. Any argument presented, any argument at all, is cast by him as being a "pseudoskeptic" or "bogus skeptic" argument. Notice he has also stopped using those terms and just refers to skeptics; to me this proves they are interchangable in his mind.
Originally posted by platosallegory
...how can you exclude a possible explanation for these events before you make an open and honest inquiry?
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by platosallegory
...how can you exclude a possible explanation for these events before you make an open and honest inquiry?
We are not doing that at all. We have stated again and again that extraterrestrials are a possible explanation. Yet time and time again, you ignore this.
By the by, sockpuppets are against the T&C, Polomontana.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Sorry, all possibilities are not weighed equally. That's not how logic and reason work.
Originally posted by platosallegory
We always weigh things in terms of what's most likely and less likely.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Again, the pseudo skeptics don't want this and that's why it took them 3 tries to answer my question.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Complex and others are proving my point beautifully.
Originally posted by yeti101
so someone sees a light in the sky that they cant I.D and you think an equally probable explanation is Extra Terrestrials in a spaceship?
Originally posted by platosallegory
If you can't even allow the possibility that extra-terrestrials and extra-dimensional beings are the most likely explanation for these things than your a closed minded debunker.
Why do you exclude extra-terrestrial or extra-dimensial beings from being the most likely explanation for these things?
The only way you can do this is if you start with the priori that these things can't or don't exist.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Sorry, all possibilities are not weighed equally. That's not how logic and reason work.
We always weigh evidence within reason and again you prove my point.
You want all possibilities to be seen as having an equal probability of being true.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Also, you continue to try and debate claims that I never made.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by platosallegory
Again, the only way that you can deny this if you start with the priori that these things can't or don't exist.
Once again, Plato, you show yourself to be a liar.
He did not say these things cannot or do not exist. He stated he believed they are a possibility. That is a far cry from the lie you are spinning.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Again, this just proves my point.
No, it just proves you are a lying piece of filth who should be banned.
Originally posted by platosallegory
Please explain why extra-terrestrial or extra-dimensional beings can't be the most likey explanation for abduction cases, eyewitness accounts, mass sightings, trace evidence, pictures and video.
Again, the only way that you can deny this if you start with the priori that these things can't or don't exist.
Originally posted by platosallegory
I'm waiting for skeptics to answer as to why extra-terrestrials or extra-dimensional beings can't be the most likely explanation for these things.