It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gate13
if obama was white there would be no fuss over where he was born.
as long as he does good job for your country who gives a f@#ck where he is from even if your constitution says the president has to be born in america
Originally posted by Jim Scott
What? This is still an issue? For pete's sake, he was born of an American citizen. That makes him an American citizen. Read the law, instead of this thread and all the other ones like it.
Originally posted by gate13
if obama was white there would be no fuss over where he was born.
as long as he does good job for your country who gives a f@#ck where he is from even if your constitution says the president has to be born in america
Originally posted by truthseeker12
Originally posted by gate13
if obama was white there would be no fuss over where he was born.
as long as he does good job for your country who gives a f@#ck where he is from even if your constitution says the president has to be born in america
ummm last time i checked John McCain is white and there was a big fuss over where he was born. put the race card back in your wallet.
also, Obama is not doing a good job for this country, he has put us further in debt in 2 months than Bush did in 8 years. well actually Obama hasnt done a thing since taking office accept appoint people to make the decisions for him.
Originally posted by gate13
Originally posted by truthseeker12
Originally posted by gate13
if obama was white there would be no fuss over where he was born.
as long as he does good job for your country who gives a f@#ck where he is from even if your constitution says the president has to be born in america
ummm last time i checked John McCain is white and there was a big fuss over where he was born. put the race card back in your wallet.
also, Obama is not doing a good job for this country, he has put us further in debt in 2 months than Bush did in 8 years. well actually Obama hasnt done a thing since taking office accept appoint people to make the decisions for him.
is obama to blaim for the economical problems we re having world wirde at the momment? if bush was in power would he not be taking the same measures as obama or at least doing something similar?
howard left australia in a surplus and rudd has put us $200 billion in debt that will take 10 years to pay back. what is the best way of doing it?
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Lets see here.... the Bush administration, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the republican party, the Hillary campagin, the McCain campaign, the DNC, the Hawaii republican state government and the Hawaiian health officials. Why dont you go ahead an ask them as to why they agree that Obama was born on US soil. The rightwing fringe aint enough to convince anybody there is a real issue, especially if they continue to reference WND.
No thats where you are wrong. This BC conspiracy has been up and running since late 2007, the notion the Hillary campaign found out something and left it and just went through that whole desperate fiasco in the last months is well.... either stupid or playing the fool merc...
And yet they voted him in. Most conservatives and republicans dont like Bush now..... and yet they voted him in twice. The folks on the right cant make up their minds.
What your doing here is basically saying that both the McCain and Hillary campaigns didnt want to release this at the expense of their own campaigns. That is far from true in that scenario, infact there was a bitter divide and both rival campaigns were desperate. They didnt hold out on anything. The elections where Obama only got a mere 7% more proved how close things were.
This is the issue, you folks continue to change your story. Its when the notion of all the agencies and groups who agree he is eligible, then they are implicated in a conspiracy. The fact checkers who confirmed his eligibility are now also implicated in some conspiracy. While your at it why dont you implicate around 60 million americans in this "conspiracy" merce
He presented his short for birth certificate which was sufficient evidence:
..and by the way Im yet to see a reference as to whether it the fact of being born over seas and still having it announced in the papers is factual. In addition Obamas birth was announced in two papers in Hawaii, now dont you think the notion of Obamas mother going to kenya, having Obama there, and then coming back and having it announced in the papers well... just unreal? Come on now.
Obama was born on August 4th 1961. The newspaper was dated august 13 as seen above. It shows it was about 9 days following his birth and it actually says in the newspaper announcement that he was born on August the 4th. The other article and the officials involved in the articles can confirmed that it is real. The article was actually found by a Hillary supporter.
"Based on Mccain's birth place, he technically would not be legally allowed to be president"
That's wrong.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
When they are ready to collapse the banks they will collapse Obama a day or two before. With constitutional scholars debating whether Biden would be eligible because he was elected on an ineligible ticket and accusations flying that house leaders like Pelosi .......
Originally posted by Irish M1ck
reply to post by Aermacchi
Uhh, as the state department has already made clear, for the vaulted birth certificate to even be examined by the appropriate outside individuals, the fringe need to provide reason. There must be a court order.
Again, want to get verifiable evidence (aka, you still just have to trust the person who examines it), then you need to get a court order.
The only people you guys have to blame is yourselves. You have failed at getting any case to discovery, the point at which Obama would have to provide some evidence of his own.
Originally posted by JPhish
Originally posted by Aermacchi
We don't hate Obama southern, we hate the Borg that put an imposter in office.
exactly. Obama to me, is more scary than Bush ever was. At least we had an idea of what Bushes M.O. was based on how his father helped run the country. We have no idea what to expect from Obama.
Originally posted by Irish M1ck
reply to post by Aermacchi
That was a big long post for nothing. It is the side of the accuser that has the burden of proof to bring this to trial. Once that happens, if it happens, you'll get what you want.
If not, oh well. Take up a new cause.
Originally posted by truthseeker12
burden of proof? proof requires evidence, to gather evidence you need discovery.
the Obama camp is blocking any attempt at discovery of the evidence and the SCOTUS is going right along with it.
doesnt matter as i have stated before it is impossible for Barack Obama to be a natural born citizen since his father was not an American citizen but was rather a British subject.
1. Every person who, having been born in Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963...
2. Every person who, having been born outside Kenya, is on 11th December, 1963 a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or a British protected person shall, if his father becomes, or would but for his death have become, a citizen of Kenya by virtue of subsection (1), become a citizen of Kenya on 12th December, 1963.