It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Ok, I believe they are intelligently controlled crafts. The fact that they form a perfect cirlcle and flash intermittantly should at least provide some substantial proof to what I am saying.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
My claim as you put it, is that NASA know about this presence and that they intentionally keep it from the public.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
show us something that backs up your argument ie videos of formations of other ice crystals,meteors or debris.
You claim that this is substantial proof Fran.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Ok, I believe they are intelligently controlled crafts (piloted by beings that are not from this earth, that nasa know and work with) The fact that they form a perfect cirlcle and flash intermittantly should at least provide some substantial proof to what I am saying.
Are you not the Public Fran, here you are, knowing what NASA is doing! By viewing NASA footage on the WEB. Doesn't look like a cover up does it? In fact you can view massive amounts of footage relating to NASA missions.
My claim as you put it, is that NASA know about this presence and that they intentionally keep it from the public. For reasons unknown.
I can show you plenty of STS missions, its just that you or others have posted them as undeniable proof of UFO's piloted by aliens. My question to Believers is, is this really all you have. Reflecting space junk, please, get something NEW. For christs sake the video is from 1996. Please don't pull out a STS 48 video. Its the same effect.
My question to the 'debunkers' instead of saying the same old things over and over, if you REALLY think its debris or ice crystals, show us something that backs up your argument ie videos of formations of other ice crystals,meteors or debris.
Because it is lame at best and has been dealt with before.
Look at the previous links of threads that phage posted in his to me to say this had been discussed before look at the little attention it gets
Why is this???????
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
it is people like Franspeakfree or UnconventionalRyan, those who declare it is undeniable and impossible to debunk.
Originally posted by atlasastro
You claim that nasa is covertly operating with ET, how do explain NASA allowing footage of this.
You derive all this from small dots on a black and white video from 1996, ignoring NASA's explanation in favour of your own
How do you know these UFO's are not piloted by humans. You can't discount that either.
Are you not the Public Fran, here you are, knowing what NASA is doing! By viewing NASA footage on the WEB. Doesn't look like a cover up does it? In fact you can view massive amounts of footage relating to NASA missions.
Because it is lame at best and has been dealt with before.
These aren't the droids you are looking for!
Move along, move along.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
To reply to your question, SaviorComplex I have seen with my own eyes a 'flying saucer...
Originally posted by franspeakfree
This video cannot be discarded by saying that what we see making the formation and flashing are ice crystals from a water dump or space debris coming together randomly.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
The fundamental basics of what we have in this video is a series of UFO'S (Unidentified Flying Objects) coming together and forming a perfect circle and then starting to flash in unison in front of the STS 80 shuttle
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Now if you can prove me wrong by posting evidence...
That is not how science works. You cannot make a declarative statement, without any evidence or argument, then say unless someone can prove you wrong then you are right. Instead, the onus is on you to prove your claim. Please, provide us with a cogent argument.
The inability to invalidate a hypothesis is not the same as proving it.
Originally posted by atlasastro
Because it is lame at best and has been dealt with before.
These aren't the droids you are looking for!
Move along, move along.
Originally posted by atlasastro
but you can't seriously tell me you get all of what you believe from intermittent flashing dots on a 12 year old video. Please.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
But attacking me is hardly a solid case for the scientific opposition.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Show me scientifically why I am wrong to think these lights are E.T
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Asking you questions, pointing out the fallacies of your argument, and demanding evidence to back up your claim is not attacking you.
You have not shown scientifically that these are alien craft. Show us how they are alien craft; all you have done is make a declarative statement, they are alien and cannot be debunked, but have provided nothing to support that argument, outside of them being alien by virtue of being mysterious. Whether or not we can invalidate your claim is meaningless; ffailing to invalidate a claim is not the same as proving it. The onus is on you to prove your claim.
Prove it. Prove these are alien craft. Provide evidence, produce a cogent argument.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Mirror Mirror - As said before this is my opinion, which I must add, many adopt.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
The question I ask now is why is it so important for you for me to prove that this is ET?
Originally posted by franspeakfree
However, I can see what you are doing and thats trying to derail the thread to stop it ending up like the STS 114 one that according to my u2us has built up quite alot of interest on this site.
Why is that?
Originally posted by redhead57
I have not ever known a natural phenomenon to light up and form lovely patterns like what we see in the video!
Originally posted by redhead57
It seems that the two sides will not ever agree so what is the point of showing up in these threads if you think this is crap????
Originally posted by UnconventionalRyan1990
Yeah, the debunkers usually tend to stay away from this one lol. "Oh no, it's gonna be hard to try and prove these are ice particles. Maybe if we ignore it, it'll go away by itself." Haha.
Originally posted by Hawkwind.
Originally posted by UnconventionalRyan1990
Yeah, the debunkers usually tend to stay away from this one lol. "Oh no, it's gonna be hard to try and prove these are ice particles. Maybe if we ignore it, it'll go away by itself." Haha.
I'm seeing a lot of smugness in this thread from closed minded believers saying ''duhhh come on debunkers, debunk it'' but I'd like someone to prove that these blurry lights are alien. Come on closed minded believers, prove the blurry lights or whatever they are are alien. The video is interesting but when you have closed minded believers stating it HAS to be alien then I have to question those people's objectivity. There should be a rule about people not being allowed to title a thread with the words 'undeniable proof' unless there is some, unless it states in the title ''imo''.
Just because blurry lights cannot be identified it does not automatically mean they are alien.
I posted a thread a short while back and didn't get one single reply, the thread posed a ''possible'' explanation for a lot of sightings but it seems a lot of people want to believe so much that they will not consider any other explanation other than it has to be alien. Here's the link.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I would like to see more open mindedness from closed minded believers and sceptics alike, there should be a balance. When it comes down to it both parties want the same thing, real proof, REAL proof.
I posted a thread a short while back and didn't get one single reply, the thread posed a ''possible'' explanation for a lot of sightings but it seems a lot of people want to believe so much that they will not consider any other explanation other than it has to be alien. Here's the link.
Originally posted by franspeakfree
Take this video for example. Savior demanded why I believe that these objects are UFOS ET in origin.
Originally posted by drummerroy39
With regard to the HIGH SPEED TURN and the HYPER VELOCITY move on the David Sereda video, series 1 # 4-5. Can you please explain in prosaic terms, what we are looking at in these two clips? Please explain how the hell an object traveling at hyper speeds can make a 45 degree turn and not explode from the g-force. Then also please explain how any object can travel over 1000 miles at 900,000 mph, 250 feet per sec, in earths atmosphere and survive without burning up. This is way beyond comprehension and can not be debunked.