It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

AIG Counterparties Waiting For The Fire Sale!?

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 06:30 PM
link   
The Corruption is so deep, it seems impossible that any of this will ever be weighed. It is possible, that when the time comes right, there could be such a collapse that it will throw this county into mayhem!

Greed has blinded congress. How many of these congressmen and senators are part of this? Proping up the Zombie Banks and AIG?

The bailouts are all one big Ponzi Scheme....all of it!


Everyone knows what the problem is. Banks and Tim Geithner think toxic waste is worth more than the anyone is currently willing to pay. Hedge funds, vulture funds, even new funds small investors might be able to buy into, all of them think the prices will go lower. This is a standard practice: if someone is headed for bankruptcy, wait until they file to buy their assets. Of course, you might have to bid against other people, but in this case, there are so many assets that you don’t really have to worry about that. How many of these vultures are AIG counterparties who have already been paid off by the Treasury?

Just how greedy are these people? Consider John Paulson. Last year he made huge returns, 36% after fees in one of his hedge funds, mostly from shorting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Lehman Bros. and other financial institutions early in 2008. What is he doing now?



firedoglake.com...




posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 09:09 PM
link   
I agree is nothing but corruption at its greediest because as its finest is not.

Now that the government owns about 80% of AIG what they are doing is boosting their balance sheets, with huge injections of capital, creating an atmosphere of well being to boos the Markets confidence.



posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 09:21 PM
link   
Some very interesting facts about the bail outs (3) for AIG that could explain while AIG is not longer to big to fail...

www.dcexaminer.com...


"The government stepped in last year with $150 billion because AIG was too big to fail," said Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. "The stock was trading in early September at more than $20 per share.

Today it's worth less than 50 cents a share. If we keep pumping billions of tax dollars into it, I'd say we'll soon reach the point where AIG won't be too big to fail, and then we can stop giving them money."

Mr. Geithner explained that President Obama is using a similar principle in the housing bail out.

"By forcing banks to cut payments for irresponsible homeowners rather than foreclose, the value of all mortgages will continue to decrease until many banks will cease being too big to fail," Mr. Geithner said.



posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Sometimes I wonder from where our morons in government take their economic classes from, or perhaps from what other morons they take their economic advise from.

Don't you wonder who is really pulling the strings?



posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 09:27 PM
link   
Perhaps they have designed it to look that way, as if it was a series of unfortunate bubble bursts...
I believe the whole thing has been engineered...



posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 10:56 AM
link   
A Large Global Corporation rumored to File Bankruptcy this week?

This is the second article I have come across that indicated bankruptcy may be in the immediate future of AIG.

www.bloggingstocks.com...


It's beginning to look like American International Group (NYSE: AIG), the largest U.S. insurer, will file for bankruptcy possibly today or tomorrow. What could keep it from filing is a $75 billion raise in capital from the remaining investment banks. But thanks to a $14 billion margin call on its Credit Default Swaps (CDSs) resulting from S&P's downgrade of its credit rating, this capital raise is unlikely to happen.




[edit on 17-3-2009 by burntheships]



posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 11:25 AM
link   
Illuminating article that explains how this is going to benefit the counterparties...and some great graphs and charts!




"It's like a home run for some of the banks,"says Carlos Mendez, a senior managing director at ICP Capital, a fixed-income investment firm in New York. "They bought insurance from a company that ran into trouble and still managed to get all, or most, of their money back."

Under the plan announced Monday, the banks will get to keep the collateral they received from AIG, much of which came when the government made funds available to AIG in September. The banks also will sell the CDOs to the new facility at market prices averaging 50 cents on the dollar. The banks that participate will be compensated for the securities' full, or par, value in exchange for allowing AIG to unwind the credit-default swaps it wrote.


www.dailykos.com...

Who are the counterparties...more pressure is being put on AIG today as the fire gets hotter...

Pressure to reveal AIG counterparties grows!



The counterparties have never been disclosed publicly. However, banks that sought and received collateral from AIG included Goldman Sachs (GS:Goldman Sachs Group Inc
Sponsored by:

GS 95.70, +1.80, +1.9%) , Merrill Lynch, UBS AG (UBS:UBS Ag
News , chart , profile , more
Last: 9.85+0.49+5.24%

Sponsored by:
UBS 9.85, +0.49, +5.2%) and Deutsche Bank AG (DB:deutsche bank ag namen akt
News , chart , profile , more
Last: 35.05+1.13+3.33%

Sponsored by:
DB 35.05, +1.13, +3.3%) , The Wall Street Journal said in November.
Now that the government's bailout of AIG has ballooned to more than $160 billion, some politicians want to know which financial institutions benefited from taxpayer support provided to the insurer.




posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 06:52 PM
link   
Third Write Up on AIG possible bankruptcy.
Credit Suisse sees higher chance of AIG bankruptcy...

www.reuters.com...


American International Group Inc (AIG.N) faces heightened probability of a potential bankruptcy filing by the holding company, a Credit Suisse analyst said Tuesday, a day after the insurer's credit ratings were cut, jeopardizing efforts to raise cash necessary for its survival.



posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 09:40 PM
link   
Wall Street's Dangerous Refusal to Learn

www.washingtonpost.com...


You have to wonder what else has to go wrong, how much more wealth will need to be destroyed, before the people on Wall Street get the message that it's no longer business as usual.



Like it or not, we're all in this together now. It's cooperation and compromise, not the usual every-man-for-himself competition, that is going to get us out of this mess. And the sooner people on Wall Street embrace that reality, the better it will be for everyone.


That sounds like black mail to me...



posted on Mar, 19 2009 @ 09:52 AM
link   
Greenberg's CV Starr may try to take over AIG, this in
on March 16, 2009.


A company led by Hank Greenberg, a former chief executive of American International Group, may try to take over the insurer in a proxy fight or tender offer, according to a regulatory filing.


www.reuters.com...



posted on Mar, 20 2009 @ 12:35 PM
link   
AIG’s defenders are saying there were contracts that needed to be honored. The argument goes that AIG is too big to fail. The word “bonus” has a different meaning on Wall Street as compared to Main Street.

For most of us, bonuses only come when the company is profitable, if they come at all. On Wall Street, bonuses are really payments that have been deferred until the end of the year.

Wall Street may have worked that way to this point. Those days need to end. Doing it their way got us here. It’s clear Congress, the Bush administration and the Obama administration weren’t able to help the financial companies without offering billions in free money.

The solution isn’t retroactive taxing. Adding strings or trying to claw back money after the fact is too late. Those options aren’t feasible and probably aren’t legal. Just let AIG fail. No more bailouts. Send the company to bankruptcy court and let the judge do what’s necessary to either reorganize or liquidate the business. The process is already in place. Just use it.



posted on Apr, 12 2009 @ 11:25 PM
link   

There is a rumor about Goldman Sachs flying around on the street - allegedly they are about to report their second-best quarter in history, +$12 billion or so.

In addition, there is this from Bloomberg:

A 47 percent gain for the company’s stock price this year and a return to profitability in the first quarter may help Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein raise new money, analysts said. That might let Goldman Sachs, the sixth-biggest bank, return the cash received in October from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program and shake off compensation and hiring restrictions imposed on banks that took the U.S. aid.

Gee, you don't think being paid by the taxpayer through AIG's "conduit" for losses that didn't (yet) happen at 100 cents on the dollar might have anything to do with that, do you?

And further (and potentially much worse) there is the repeated statement by Goldman executives that they were "fully hedged" against a potential counterparty default by AIG.

One wonders - was that "hedge" to be short the equity on AIG itself, perhaps?

Why is this important?

Because if that's how Goldman hedged they got paid twice and the taxpayer literally got robbed.

Someone in Congress needs to look into this now; there are already rumblings of investigation. Those rumblings need to get a lot louder and turn into subpoenas, not "polite inquiries."

If in fact Goldman (or anyone else) was "hedged" against a possible credit loss from their CDS with AIG and they were able to collect on that hedge (no matter what it was) those payments through AIG need to be clawed back immediately as nobody is entitled to be paid twice for the same risk and reap what amounts to a windfall profit by quite literally engineering a multi-billion dollar transfer of funds from the Taxpayer to the firm!

This is not small potatoes either - we're talking $100 billion+ in aggregate with these various banks on a worldwide basis.

We the people deserve answers on this right now and if persons in our government handed these banks $100 billion dollars of our tax money for what was a covered bet, allowing them to collect twice on a risk that had not yet been realized (when at most they were entitled to collect once via their private hedging activity) every single person involved in that scandal must be immediately removed from office, prosecuted if possible, and every nickel of those funds must be clawed back by whatever means are necessary.
market-ticker.denninger.net...


[edit on 12-4-2009 by burntheships]



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join