It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Desolate Cancer
reply to post by Cloudsinthesky
I mean as much as us on ATS and others would like to see those kinds of questions they are not plausible in msm setting.
Yes Ben does seem very smart and likable and I hope to god obama and his people shut their mouths for a couple days so the market can rally a bit,(even if its fake).
I mean it makes sense on the ptb part to have a likable person in that position during this time.
Originally posted by Cloudsinthesky
Sure he answers the question............like where did the money go?? "I am not going to tell you"
So if you consider that throwing it back in there face............
Originally posted by anachryon
He lost any credibility when he said that the big banks are solvent.
He came across as personable and human, and I honestly don't think he's a monster. As covered in the piece, though, Mr. Bernanke's entire career has been about preparing for the very events we're experiencing now.
Imagine you worked and studied for 30 years, day in and day out, to determine that the best way to put out a fire is to dump water on it. One day a massive chemical fire breaks out, and you, being the foremost expert, are called upon to extinguish the fire.
You continue to order more water to be pumped even though you can see the fire taking over the whole block, then the neighborhood, then the entire city. You don't know what else to do.
That's what Ben is experiencing now. His core philosophy has always been the half-Keynesian solution of "throw money at it!", only throwing money at it isn't going to work on this type of fire.
Originally posted by Desolate Cancer
Originally posted by anachryon
He lost any credibility when he said that the big banks are solvent.
He came across as personable and human, and I honestly don't think he's a monster. As covered in the piece, though, Mr. Bernanke's entire career has been about preparing for the very events we're experiencing now.
Imagine you worked and studied for 30 years, day in and day out, to determine that the best way to put out a fire is to dump water on it. One day a massive chemical fire breaks out, and you, being the foremost expert, are called upon to extinguish the fire.
You continue to order more water to be pumped even though you can see the fire taking over the whole block, then the neighborhood, then the entire city. You don't know what else to do.
That's what Ben is experiencing now. His core philosophy has always been the half-Keynesian solution of "throw money at it!", only throwing money at it isn't going to work on this type of fire.
Great analogy. I would say that maybe this is true and I geuss in this chemical fire the best thing to do is what? Let the fire burn itself out while trying to cordon off the area around it..... forget the analogy lets refer it to the real situation (I did like the analogy a lot though).
Do we take the free market approach & let the banks fail and then allow for the smaller banks who are solvent to rise up and take over the failed ones places, through mergers and acquisitions?
Do we do a govt supported free market approach and force the real pricing of the toxic assets so that private buyers become interested?
What would you recommend? I personally think the true free market approach is the best even though it will be painful in the short term.
Originally posted by Cloudsinthesky
I just googled and pasted the first site I came to...........
We "The People Have The Right To Know Where The Money Went"
www.newgeography.com...
Fed Chairman Bernanke went to the Senate Budget Committee yesterday to testify. The Senators asked him at least four times, and in different ways, where he is burying the loot that is being shovelled his way. And, at least four times, he refused to answer.
Originally posted by Desolate Cancer
Great analogy. I would say that maybe this is true and I geuss in this chemical fire the best thing to do is what? Let the fire burn itself out while trying to cordon off the area around it..... forget the analogy lets refer it to the real situation (I did like the analogy a lot though).
Do we take the free market approach & let the banks fail and then allow for the smaller banks who are solvent to rise up and take over the failed ones places, through mergers and acquisitions?
Do we do a govt supported free market approach and force the real pricing of the toxic assets so that private buyers become interested?
What would you recommend? I personally think the true free market approach is the best even though it will be painful in the short term.
Originally posted by GreenBicMan
The gains in C and BAC are real for the first two months.. but please keep shorting these stocks, you may be squeezed for everything you have
Originally posted by Cloudsinthesky
Fed Chairman Bernanke went to the Senate Budget Committee yesterday to testify. The Senators asked him at least four times, and in different ways, where he is burying the loot that is being shovelled his way. And, at least four times, he refused to answer.
discuss.epluribusmedia.net...
Geeeezzzz............I hate when I have to spell things out that have been in the mainstream media