It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NRA4ever333
It is obvious you have put a lot of work into this. I am not a mathematician so I do not feel qualified to comment on the work itself. But with my mathematical understanding, it does seem to be a sound equation.
Skeptics will never buy it however. If something that contradicts their beliefs is shown to them they either ignore it the facts, and use speculation in order to try and disprove it. Or they ignore the argument entirely.
Do you have a separate equation to compare it to in order to prove it true?
Originally posted by atlasastro
i like your post.
Maths does not deal with the whole of reality or existence for me, but parts or abstracts of reality.
It is used to describe or model what we see or parts therof.
What is significant to me is that from observation we can see patterns and construct equations that are applicable in a number of ways across a variety of observation of reality.
In a way, IMHO this supports a creator hypothesis as there is a uniformity and parameters to our existence that are so complex and intricate that people will be inspired to consider that the universe was designed by and consciousness of infinite magnitude.