It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Extraterrestrial Biological Entity{EBE}A.K."AQ-J-Rod"{JR}

page: 5
28
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 08:55 PM
link   
reply to post by cognoscente
 


The way I read that article in regards to the age thing was that this being got sick and started showing signs of advanced aging quickly.

I had to go to the interwebs to look up words like neuropathogenicity and acidosis, so I very well could be wrong.
The article never really mentions an age, just that the neuropathogenicity and acidosis was accounting for the increased aging. .02

As for the rest of this thing, I don't trust this for a bit.




posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 09:26 PM
link   
Is their any possible way in the slightest we can found out where these people live? or any chance anybody could give me a good direction where to begin looking? (I will look around myself in the mean time)


Edit: also, does anybody know if they are using their real names?


[edit on 15-3-2009 by MrAnonUK]



posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 10:04 PM
link   
reply to post by MrAnonUK
 


Yes those are their real names.
good luck onthe search



posted on Mar, 15 2009 @ 10:13 PM
link   
The use of the term "back engineered" or "back engineering" seems suspect to me. Not sure why, but it just seems like the gov would have some other term for this other than using some current buzz word back in 1996.

Yeah I know that term has been used for a while but,
I'm just saying.........



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 12:08 AM
link   
After reading through alot of what you guys have been talking about I realized that I had heard alot of this before in a 2007 episode of the Kevin Smith radio show. You can download the MP3 by clicking HERE or you can listen to it streaming HERE ! The show is from February 2007 and it is an oldy but a goody. For those of you that haven't heard Kevin Smith's radio show, he has a very listenable, almost calming, voice. He actually reminds me of my grandfather in alot of ways.

The project camelot folks on his radio show run the website
ProjectCamelot.org which is actually a pretty good research tool.

They offer alot of free in-depth personal interviews. Their library of interviews alone is pretty impressive....Including a really good, in-depth interview with Dan Burisch, actually, that can be found HERE . It is available for download in multiple different formats.

For their video interview archive all by itself (which is massive) click HERE

For their Audio interview archive all by itself click HERE

-ChriS



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 02:02 AM
link   
Well, I've studied cellular biology at university level.

However, that's not of such great importance; more pertinent is the alleged identity of this man; Danny Crain (later Dan Burisch).

I notice most of you are not familiar with the Dan Burisch saga. I urge all of you to familiarize yourselves further with it; since it very well could be considered one of the top most important testimonials of our time.

To be very, very brief: Claims of his existence first made their way online in about 2001 or so. Not much later of course, prominent world-famous ufologist Bill Hamilton would write an entire book on the subject. However at this time, the story of Mr. Burisch appeared to be akin to hearsay. Different individuals allegedly chatted with Mr. Burisch on various occasions, and so on. It could be deduced he worked in "deep black" projects, but was not very happy with the circumstances.

Mr. Burisch was later to confide in interviews, that perhaps his "career" as we have come to know it, began decades ago, when he was abducted during a day in the park with his grandfather. Here, the tale immediately turns a tad odd, undeniably. Dan here claims also aboard the craft in question, was the son of the chairman of the then Majestic Twelve. However, this son for some reason did not make it - which apparently induced the extraterrestrials to transfer his soul, into Mr. Burisch.

This in turn led to (at least the chairman of) MJ12 always having a soft spot for Dan. Moving on; as he continued into high school and later university, he would one day come to be courted by representatives of the above mentioned organization, who had noticed his extraordinary skills in the biology and laboratory fields.

Dan accepted their offer, and for many years worked at Area 51, while still living at his parents. One very obscured aspect of the Burisch saga, is the fact that Mr. Burisch's mother (as interviewed by Jerry Pippin), claim that her son would come to be replaced by some form of replica.

However as alluded to above, Dan would come to be less then happy with the circumstances surrounding his daily work. This all culminated in him finally smuggling out and releasing the "Q94 document", which is the topic of this thread.

It deals with Dan's working with an extraterrestrial being, and more specifically how to prolong the creature's existence.

One of the projects Dan allegedly worked on, was called "Project Looking Glass". I jumped when I heard him mention this - as the name had been mentioned a decade or so ago, by two different individuals (Robert Lazar, and Alfred Bielek).

The project basically dealt with seeing into the future. Using the devices involved, it was determined that there was different "timelines" to choose between. Here, it gets somewhat strange again. According to information devulged to e.g. Mr. Burisch and his teams, certain extraterrestrial beings - in fact being us, but from the future - insisted that we choose particular timelines, since they included the assured future existence of these future humans/extraterrestrial beings.

Saddam Hussein according to the story, was in possession of one such naturally occurring device, which to some appeared as one more reason to not postpone his presidency any longer. Also there was some African king or alike in the same situation, however he agreed to turn over the device when learning of its importance.

Mr. Burisch would later come to give a potentially historical testimonial on the Jeff Rense show, alleging the orders of his superiors (Dan's) of MJ12 for him to divulge as much information as possible on the extraterrestrial reality to the world.

He has also been interviewed under the Camelot Project (www.projectcamelot.org).

Today, Mr. Burisch together with a woman who very strangely always was right beside him during all interviews ready to comment, hosts a colorful website; www.eaglesdisobey.net. I am unaware of him still being employed by the government.

[edit on 16-3-2009 by Loengard]



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 02:56 AM
link   
I think this guy Burish/Craine is full of crap but he does some good research to back his story, nothing he says can be proven and in fact George Knapp investigated this guy and his wife when he first started making these claims.
Knapp found that Burish was working as a security guard for a Las Vegas casino when he was supposed to be working for MAJ 12, his wife who is also supposed to be involved with MAJ 12 was arrested and charged with drug smuggling around this time also. No records can be found of his credentials and no proof of his work background could be verified, he drives around with an S4 sticker on his back windscreen letting the world know where he works obviously not the actions of a worker on secret programmes.
I think if the US government needed help with ETs then I sincerely hope they would choose people more qualified than a security guard and a drug smuggler.
He has a website called Eagles disobey which is subscription based and since he first told his story on project camelot his income has increased dramatically, lets not forget projectcamelot do not investigate their interviewees or their claims, so just printing or in this case video has no basis in reality as we can all make outlandish claims and call projectcamelot for the scoop.



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 05:38 AM
link   
reply to post by RiotComing
 


Since you guys didn't want to read the whole thread with all the links...I will give the link that ended that thread.
Its the accomplished George Knapp head to head vs Dan Burisch.
George proves he is a hoax.
Watch everyone of Dans weak answers as he tries to deflect the actual truths that George keeps bringing up.
Dan is scrambling to stay afloat in the conversation and its obvious who is lying here.
www.danburisch.info...



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 10:40 AM
link   
Dan is certainly a controversial guy.

As far as the whole conversation about the using of human DNA to help the J-Rod, if they are us in the future then there certainly could be something in our DNA that would coincide with theirs. (just a thought)

As always ats has great subject matter and a variety of members with a variety of positions. I still think there is something to both Lazar's story and Dan's.

As an aside, does anyone know why John Lear broke his ties with ats? I had heard vaguely that he is no longer involved here. Funny, it is because of a pc interview with him that I ended up coming here. red



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 12:46 PM
link   
reply to post by redhead57
 


just search ATS for John Lear, and you're bound to find something relative to his lack of posting any longer here on ATS...

i heard that he still browses the site daily, but he just doesn't post anymore - personally, i still can't figure out if he was banned or not; it's a conspiracy in itself!



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 02:12 PM
link   
Interesting thread, I have always remained a little skeptical when it comes to Dan Burisch but reading those notes, they certainly sound genuine.

Heres some more info on Dr Benjamin Crain

Update About microbiologist Dan Burisch PHD



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 02:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by DrumsRfun
reply to post by Iago18
 


The guy is a hoax.
Its funny how the thread proving he is a hoax was put up there twice and this thread is still going.
Read the thread people.


You need to substantiate such extraordinary claims. Or are you fielding an opinion. If so please give context so we can dismiss or read deeper into your statement.

OK, looking at your data, but please provide with your statements in the future to save time.

Thanks,

ZG

[edit on 3/16/2009 by ZeroGhost]



posted on Mar, 16 2009 @ 03:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrAnonUK
reply to post by awake_awoke
 


Just seeing these guys makes me sure they are full of crap, what genuine contactee would want these people to represent them is they truely wanted people to believe!?

One is a self confessed former drug addict and the other two, well...

With that story of timelines changing aswell, so okay they came out with a prediction and had a backup story, fortunately for them they had a backup because at the time they talked asif they knew for a fact what was going to happen.

These people in my opinion are an absolute disgrace, abusing peoples search and only looking to benefit themselves through your donations , please think for a second... If you was the person being contacted, would these be the people you choose to get people to believe you? categoric NO from me.



Thank you for stating your opinion. I cannot with any certainty rely on your statements due to your unstated professional expertise in profiling and psychological and visual investigative. I think such "opinions" can be noise in an intelligent discussion.

I do sense you are fairly certain however, but are curious on why or what visual markers you are referencing. I have listened for years to interviews with these individuals, but can make no absolute determination in either direction. I do sense with my own "opinion" by evaluating the qualitative aspects of their conversations, writings and general demeanor that they are not lying. Embellishment, while possible in their delivery of information I rather think are aspects of their personality and individual interpretive lexicon of terms and translative refrence to terminology, much of which is outside our technology and general understanding of the universe.

In such subjects we as humans in a fairly limited enlightened society, culture and technology are grasping for terms, words or simple references that can make sense in understanding. As such we need to consider that with such a lack of historic or technical reference will use seemingly strange or obtuse choices, depending on the persons personal history and mythology.

I think I have a reasonable ability to read people, taking into consideration the stated observations, but would not sign off on an "opinion" without substantiating such with facts.

This information Dan and related are discussing and describing seems to be consistent with a very wide field of information of this type, but is not derivative or artfully composed, in my "opinion".

Like everyone, I've been fooled before. Grain of salt in any case.

ZG



posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 06:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by ZeroGhost

Originally posted by MrAnonUK
reply to post by awake_awoke
 

Like everyone, I've been fooled before. Grain of salt in any case.

ZG



I feel the same.
Dan has many stories that overlap and the shear number of stories combined with the complexity of the stories has never proven to disprove itself.
Other witnesses have confirmed his stories with their own without knowledge or relations to one another.

It's absolutely magnificent of what he is saying is true. It's sad and scary at the same time. Including him within a factual whole is needed in order to even assess his situation. Standing aloof and pronouncing foul via simple observations and circumstances is easy. But actually delving and finding the card that breaks the whole house down hasn't been done yet IMO.

I just cross referenced a lot of text with the q-94 doc and this doc is AMAZING.
complex definitions are concisely employed with one another to achieve a vibrancy in the comprehension of his message.. If it is fake, then it's the most technically real/fake document I have ever read.

b



posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 07:04 AM
link   
reply to post by Common Good
 


It would be GREAT if this wasn't such a poorly scanned copy that I could actually READ it.

How is anyone reading this?



posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 01:11 PM
link   
reply to post by HunkaHunka
 

here's a text version for you
text version

b



posted on Mar, 17 2009 @ 03:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Common Good
 


Having seen all kinds of classified documents this is a fake military regulations on documents is very strict and has requirements such as document number must be located on bottom of every page with date of creation. Also required is signature page again dated at the end of document the 1st digits of document are creation date ie 2008 for filling. Its required the cover page must have a document name. This document has no name just a number. Every page must be numbered to prevent documents from being changed this is not a us government document this was written by someone who thought this is what it should look like.



posted on Mar, 18 2009 @ 03:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Common Good
This is a document I found on the internet while researching. When I found it, it had a cosmic classification on it. If this really is indeed real, they didnt do such a great job of keeping it off the internet.
There are also many parts of this document that I do not understand.
I want to get someone who knows about biology to give a good swing at this and give me and other posters some insight on it.
Thanks People,Hope you enjoy this document if anything.

www.projectcamelot.org...

Edit to Note: Read the very last paragraph. =)

[edit on 15-3-2009 by Common Good]


I can't read it . It is really blurry. Any ideas or help please . I really want to read this.
Thanks.



posted on Mar, 18 2009 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by dragonridr
reply to post by Common Good
 


Having seen all kinds of classified documents this is a fake military regulations on documents is very strict and has requirements such as document number must be located on bottom of every page with date of creation. Also required is signature page again dated at the end of document the 1st digits of document are creation date ie 2008 for filling. Its required the cover page must have a document name. This document has no name just a number. Every page must be numbered to prevent documents from being changed this is not a us government document this was written by someone who thought this is what it should look like.


Thats for the documents regular people are allowed to see. The classified stuff might have different regulations as to by pass people knowing about it.



posted on Apr, 1 2009 @ 05:03 PM
link   
Wow thread starter, very interesting find! I may have something valuable to add to this thread as well. I found the following while browsing other conspiracy sites and didnt think too much of it. Now that I found this thread, it all starts coming together.

Check it out:


From: Internal Affairs and Information Services (IAIS)
Sent: Thursday july 18 1995 at 09:45 AM

Subject:Urgent: Opperation Desert Rat.
Importance: High.

It has come to our attention that rogue agents under assumed names have begun to use the internet as an underground channel for distribution of classified information as it relates to our involvement with
Extraterrestrial Biologic Entities (EBE).To rectify this situation, we authorize the immediate creation of false personalities who will be logged onto major UFO message boards and internet relay chat sessions. Once these internet personalities have established themselves, websites supposedly created by them will go “live” with the sole purpose of discrediting and providing humourous coverage of the unauthorized information. A second set of personalities will also be created to serve as extremist UFO researchers. These people will claim credit for the unautorized information and transform it using absurd exagerations to appear hoax-like and nonsensical in a effort to further invalidate the significance of this data to the general public.

National Security Information Directorate.

this may contain information exempt from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information ACT. (FOIA)

Could the document you found be one of those "leaks" described in this email? I think there is a high probability that this is the case. When you look at the section "Course of Action" it talks about how "samples" were removed from the subject July 19, 1994 to September 25, 1996. The above email allegedly is from July 1995.



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join