It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by sos37
That's where the disconnect is. I'm not talking about this one interview in particular and you are. I'm talking about Jon Stewart's show and the fact that it's on Comedy Central and the fact that Jon Stewart's show historically is nothing but making fun of news events serves to cast doubt when he actually has something to say.
The point is - people will talk about the interview and the conversation may go something like this:
Person A: "Did you see that interview on Jon Stewart last night?"
Person B: "No."
Person A: "Man he did great. He really exposed Jim Cramer!"
Person B: "Isn't that a Comedy show on Comedy Central?"
Person A: "Yeah. But last night was different."
Doesn't matter what Person A says from that point on - if Person B isn't too familiar with Jon Stewart then credibility has already been lost because it's been established that it was from a comedy show on comedy central.
Person B does the whole stereotype thing and decides it's probably not worth the time to watch unless he has a vested interest in seeing Jim Cramer go down.
In late 2004, the National Annenberg Election Survey at the University of Pennsylvania ran a study of American television viewers and found that fans of The Daily Show had a more accurate idea of the facts behind the 2004 presidential election than most others, including those who primarily got their news through the national network evening newscasts and through reading newspapers.[73] However, in a 2004 campaign survey conducted by the Pew Research Center those who cited comedy shows such as The Daily Show as a source for news were among the least informed on campaign events and key aspects of the candidates' backgrounds while those who cited the Internet, National Public Radio, and news magazines were the most informed. Even when age and education were taken into account, the people who learned about the campaigns through the Internet were still found to be the most informed, while those who learned from comedy shows were the least informed.[74]
A more recent survey, released by the Pew Research Center on April 15, 2007, indicates that regular viewers of The Daily Show tend to be more knowledgeable about news than audiences of other news sources. Approximately 54% of The Daily Show viewers scored in the high knowledge range, followed by Jim Lehrer's program at 53% and Bill O'Reilly's program at 51%, significantly higher than the 34% of network morning show viewers. The survey shows that changing news formats have not made much difference on how much the public knows about national and international affairs, but adds that there is no clear connection between news formats and what audiences know.[75] The Project for Excellence in Journalism released a content analysis report suggesting that The Daily Show comes close to providing the complete daily news.[76]
A 2006 study published by Indiana University tried to compare the substantive amount of information of The Daily Show against prime time network news broadcasts, and concluded that when it comes to substance, there is little difference between The Daily Show and other news outlets. The study contended that, since both programs are more focused on the nature of "infotainment" and ratings than on the dissemination of information, both are broadly equal in terms of the amount of substantial news coverage they offer.[77]
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Pehrj
No, the problem is Stewart using that excuse when people critique him. quote.
He tries to get away with acting like a real news show and holding the elite's feet to the fire when comes to conservatives or anyone else he and his writers don't like.
But it when comes to criticizing his own party and such, he hides under the sheet of "we're not serious" and gets away with it.
It's basic hypocrisy. His show is nothing more than liberal propaganda 90% of the time.
Originally posted by wonderworld
I'm curious, as to your percption of Fox Business News? Are they any different? I dont think so.
None of the experts know what advice to give except buy government debt or gold, at this point.
This temporary bear market rally will fade fast, especially in April.
Originally posted by Swatman
i didnt say it was ok, but barney frank is the root of that problem by telling banks they had to lend money to poor people that could not afford housing.
it is not a RIGHT that people should own housing, it is a privelage, just like electricity.
Originally posted by Swatman
i watch the show on a daily basis and his endless bashing of conservatives just shows how partisan he really is.
he throws in a couple of pelosi jokes to keep the conservative viewership happy.
if you deny that you should get some glasses.
it was horrible to watch this interview because he attacks cramer almost as if it is cramers fault that the dow went dowwn 4000.
who the hell listens to cramer about making money? that is just stupid.
stewart should be interviewing barney frank and chriss dodd on why people no longer have homes, not cramer.
Originally posted by intelinside451
Stewart is just crying a liberal river as CNBC and nasty capitalism has been getting considerably higher ratings as Stewart's sinks. Listening to a guy say the word "Bush" 20 times a night, 5 nights a week, 52 weeks a year has its downside.
Not to mention Cramer and CNBC have been getting some serious flack for tearing apart Obarry's incredible spending spree which will leave us wallowing in 25% inflation over the next 2-10 years.
The truth hurts
Originally posted by Swatman
who the hell listens to cramer about making money?