|
reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 04:49 PM by Gorman91
|
Or maybe it's just that across the globes many blacks are poor and or uneducated.
Duh its going to effect physical results when looking at scientific fact.
If you put a hundred people of one race on a desert island and let 5 generations go by, a doubt this island will show any remarkable intelligence or
progress.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2009 @ 12:32 PM by Aeons
|
Pretty much.
Abuse, Strife, War and Famine for a lifetime has an distinct effect on brain development.
(that's right boys in Africa - by making laws and cultural beliefs that allow you to abuse women and children your governments, leaders, and
spiritual leaders are making you STUPIDIER. Think on it.)
[edit on 2009/3/18 by Aeons]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-3-2009 @ 01:27 PM by Alxandro
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-3-2009 @ 01:21 PM by Luminaught
|
I believe the good prof. said; “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing
says not really.".
"So There is a problem with this?".- Dr. J.A. Zoidburg
I'm suspecting he refers to the indigenous.
I imagine the Afrikaaner intelect is on a dead par, if not superior to that of the prof..
Indeed their intelligence is not.
It is my considered opinion that genetic I.Q. or in fact any racial memories of any set of creatures you could name would be different.
What makes up our "reptilian" brain? Mostly a bunch of basic sorts of stuff, like signaling the lungs to suck in some air every now and then, or
telling our feet to stop walking as we begin to step out onto the glass sidewalk at the Grand Canyon, you know, automated services like that.
Then we have this great big mamalian structure which is what we pretty much think of when we say "brain".
There has long been discussion amongst scientists (usually whilst in their cups) as to whether the mind was even local to the brain and if I.Q. was in
the curvatures or the size of various super and sub structures of the human brain.
Mind would hold learned or racial memories, (race in this writing apros L. or D..
A childs immune system is a direct consequence of the quality and content of the collostrum produced by it's mother.
Perhaps the neurosymbology for characteristics handy for staying alive in the environment of the mother (and her progenitors)is transfered via
hormonal signals to enable certain functions, disable certain functions, and compile personal experiential data to the set.
If I lived where food literaly falls from the heavens, and the only thing likely to happen to me was 1. Something might eat me. 2. I might get old and
die. Other than these fascinating choices unless pressed, one may find a culturaly rewarding ability, say an afinity to song or dance. Did you know
most Polynesian dance is communication (other than let's do tha wild thang baby)? The tribal dances of the dark continent are also communication.
Europeans do not really communicate via dance except to say "Let's do tha wild thang baby".
Other than base programing(reptilian brain), the functions of the mind/brain follows learned behaviors to some degree, what is perhaps undocumented is
the length of time for learned behavior to be in the "program files", before it is entered into the sys files(the reptilian brain).
Perhaps the learned behaviors having to do with living within a european type culture, are also factors for comparison as regards the I.Q. or so
called I.Q. test.
Would any argue that the middle class white has a very different set of experiences than a lower class negro? It is as if the two cultures had
developed on different worlds, and indeed, they have.
Were the good Prof. find himself 150 years ago in the deepest african jungle, with guides, messengers, hunters, and bearers, could he hope to survive
his trek if not for the difference in our manner of thought? So in this manner the prof. is better served by the indigenous I.Q. set.
Were a test to be made of THESE elements, in the tongue of the hypothetical african tribe who have somehow come to understand what the Prof. means
when he scratches at the sand with a stick, would not the indigenous African be expected to exceed the tested I.Q. of our chief protagonist?
Very well. Now, who among us would argue that a lower class white person's cultural placement, and interoperational ability would be very different
than that of an upper class negro within our own society?
Complete with different skill sets.
That's why I can dance better than Obama.
But he's better on the golf course than I am.
And why Bob Marley was better at making music than either of us.
One Love.
[edit on 27-3-2009 by Luminaught]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 1-5-2009 @ 12:20 AM by AKINOFTHEFIRSSTARS
|
Take a second to define race/nationality/ethnicity. First I would like to cover the fact that you guys limit the word "black"to Africa(which is
proven that all people of africa developed remotely without intermingling, meaning there isnt just one "black"). When we mention the THEORY of
race, it is easy for us to include the fact that "whites" are inhabitatants of of all of the life bringing continents. But we confine "Indigenous"
and people of color to one remote area, and we even have nerve to describe anybody outside of that region(Africa) as a descendant of Euro colonialism.
I believe if you were to really do your research, and look up terms like "Veddoid","Cappoid","Hamitic",or even "Kemetic"(where we derive
chemistry,alchemy,chemicals....)and you will see there is more to "People of Color" than you would have ever imagined.
"Users of the term point to Ethiopians, Eritreans, Somalis and Nubians who exhibit phenotypical traits such as orthognathism[5], non-kinky hair
texture,[6] and keen facial features[6] seen by some as being exclusive to Caucasoid peoples. They contend such variations are indigenous to these
groups and cannot be attributed to invasions from outside Caucasoid peoples as suggested under the Dynastic Race Theory and in more recent biological
studies.[7"
Africa or (Af-Ra-Kam) is very much like asia, you can move a mile and the language and developement of the people are very different in everyway
except appearance. Is this enough to qualify everyone as one label? NO, do we consider an Italian the same as a Russian because of his complection,
No they have two completely different histories.
Now lets talk about the "black" race. When we look at "melinated" french people do we call them black,no they are french. When we look at Puerto
Ricans(dna composed mostly of African blood)do we say, of the black race nope.
This is where you strike a nerve in the people who have become comfortable with other people thinking for them. What about the indigenous people of
America, see this is where you can even answer this yourself, scientist claim "Native Americans" crossed the yadayadayada there Asian right?!?But
how can an Indiginous person be the result of a wanderer?Indiginous refers to naturally occuring or not imported (like the kangaroo from aus) how
could these people have "found" something that was already there thriving. Research the "Black Hawks" and research how one of our very own
presidents disinformed people on the native people of america.
Now that we know who blacks are "2/3" of the planet lets really look at what we have contributed. The worlds first "counters and measurers of
space and time=calendar=numbers and counting systems" The universe first music( music is the only thing known to activate about 9 regions of the
brain at once in a sort of a orchestra), the first written language and bible, The great ideas of zero and infinity and void, the first maps, the
first 3d terrestial maps of the heavens, the theory of a spherical planet, The knowledge of Atoms, Algebra, PI, the worlds first machines, I can go on
for ages.
Im sorry if I carried on a little bit, but I had too, and I will close with this. Black isnt a color at all it is more than that, it enables
colors(look how we invisioned our first tvs), when our eyes cant see pass a certain depth it turns what....black, at the center of the hole where
gravity is so strong,no time, nor space can run from this region and its vibration gives of the "color" that we recognize as black. So in a
timeless, spaceless, and whatever else less region is black as well as the fabric of space that is vibrating as we speak. Do you mean to tell me Black
would be like an equivalant to light?No superior, because it allows light to shine. A vibration that is also beyond our sight and logic? So what does
this mean and how is it related to the universe, the pineal gland and melanin, and how that gland is related to it. So I believe scientific
instruments, "intelligence", and even history are limited to a limited amount of space which disables them to measure something so vast or grand. In
other words stop trying to measure infinity with practical numbers.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-5-2009 @ 12:48 AM by Deus Ex Machina 42
|
I know plenty of intelligent blacks, I know plenty of intelligent whites, it's all pretty subjective rather one race is smarter than the other, then
if so the inferior race definitely makes up for it in some other tradeskill. I know many black and white people that are stupid and annoying, I also
know many mexican and asian people that are stupid and annoying, it's just what type of person you are that defines who you are, not your race. I
used to be pretty racist, used to look down on blacks, iused the n-word in every day conversation and expressed my freedom of speech on certain
internet forums(LL,4chan, etc) to use the word as much as possible and it's pretty disgraceful.
I have nothing against any race, I don't look down on people for skin color although I admit that when I see a black person I think different things
from when I see a mexican or another white person, it's just how society and myself have grown to develop over the years. I'm in 12th grade and I
know for a fact that every black student is walking with their class, but yet again the school is only maybe 20% black give or take.
Point I'm trying to make is live and let live, if you see someone doing something stupid and want to think something bad about them, do it for the
type of person they are not for their skin color.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 08:22 AM by rhinoceros
|
Identical twins studies have shown that there is strong correlation between intelligence (measured by IQ tests) and heredity. There's certainly
correlation between IQ test performance and socio-economic situation of a person too. Caucasians on average have it better. Caucasians also on average
perform better in these tests. How much of it does genetics explain? My educated quess is: a lot (in those twins studies socio-economic status wasn't
very important factor). It's funny how much of a taboo this is..
[edit on 3-5-2009 by rhinoceros]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 08:47 AM by pmbhuntress
|
I believe the good Dr. came into my neighborhood to do the tests. But oh well. Its a good laugh but still not all Blacks are stupid. I happen to know
a few very nice folks that are black that are doctors. Truthfully My doctor is a very nice Black lady and she finally found out what was wrong with my
back. Unlike the Chinese Dr. That I went to or the 4 white Dr.'s I had gone to.
With any race there are stupid people. Stupid whites, Blacks, Mexicans, ect. My ex sister inlaw is white and she was more stupid then any dumb blonde
joke. My brother inlaw is Mexican and he is stupid because he still believes those red headed kids his wife had are his. Then you have my Black
neighbors which we know are stupid. When the State tells you to watch your kids 4 times in a month. After neglect reports come in. And they still
allow them to play in the road, while no one pays attention for over 30 minutes. When there aged 2- 6 years old.
Yes every race has stupid people. And truthfully the Dr. that came up with this brilliant idea was stupid. The government that gave him the grants to
do it was stupid. And so on.
I hate to say it but maybe we are all just stupid, its just that some of us are minimal stupid.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 08:54 AM by MrWendal
|
I would suggest that this is a valid point, however the mystery in my opinion is not all that mysterious.
Back in the days of slaves, intelligent slaves were killed. Weak slaves were killed. The slaves were bought, traded, sold, as well as matched up for
the purposes of breeding. A strong slave worked harder and thus was preferred. Big, fast, strong, that is what slave owners wanted from their
"property".
If we were to turn back the clock a few hundred years and reverse the roles, and lets say it was white people or people of European descent that were
treated in such a way, it is they that would seem less intelligent.
Evidence of the "Super Slave" can be easily seen today, just look at the majority of professional sports and I would suggest that this Doctors
studies could possibly be linked to that time in history as well.
[edit on 3-5-2009 by MrWendal]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 09:16 AM by rhinoceros
|
Originally posted by pmbhuntress
Yes every race has stupid people. And truthfully the Dr. that came up with this brilliant idea was stupid. The government that gave him the grants to
do it was stupid. And so on.
I hate to say it but maybe we are all just stupid, its just that some of us are minimal stupid.
Some races just have more stupid people than others. We're talking statistics here. The doctor (I believe) who started this controversy is the
co-discoverer of DNA. Quite a bold statement to call him stupid
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 3-5-2009 @ 09:32 AM by Gyrochiral
|
This thread needs to be turned on its head..
I am ashamed at some of the posts.
“all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really."
Just "who" decides what we are supposed to know and how we know it?
Why does personal knowledge have to have the stigma of measure attached to it?
Could we not substitute "figures" from rural caucasian West Virginia into this study?
Sounds absurd ....does it not??
This is a debilitating, biased, judgemental topic.
If someone does not "know"..then teach or show them if you can.
Belittlement is a vicious path. Refuse to participate.
Peace...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 12:54 AM by Robin Goodfellow
|
I think it shameful that the op had devote 3/4 of itself to telling everyone to play nice. That science must now bow to political correctness is no
different than when anatomist had to steal bodies to study human physiology because the church considered it unholy.
The goal of science is to collect facts. IF all races are genetically equal then science can establish that fact.. and if they aren't?
Should we teach our children falsehoods and pass on incorrect data to them because some people might have their feelings hurt by the truth? Why not
cancel the Olympics because it makes paraplegics feel inadequate?
As a white American male I understand there is a very great possibility that I will not be 'on the top of the heap'. I understand the average I.Q.
of my particular demographic lags about 15 points or so behind the Asian but I believe this information should be made public because the Asian female
has a right to know that by marrying and mating with a white American there is a very good chance her children will not be as intelligent as could be
if they had been fathered by an Asian male.
Likewise the average American should at least have a right to know the probable effects that producing children with a negro will have on their
children's I.Q. If they choose to ignore this information that is their right, but they should at least be provided with the best information
science can provide so that they may make an informed decision.
Like religion, political correctness has no proper place in science.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-6-2009 @ 01:01 AM by Egyptia
|

reply to post by MrAnonUK
If you have a country as poor as Africa, irregardless of race, color or any other factor involved, you have limited opportunities for people to do
anything but try and survive another day. Limited resources per country and per person equalls limited opportunities.
One cannot compare intelligence unless you have the exact same paremeters and factors for every group being researched.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 04:10 AM by Beneia
|
If the premise is true, can they explain a man like George Washington Carver? Did you know that George Washington Carver marveled at God’s
creation. He arose each day at 4:00 a.m. and took long walks in the woods so that he could think quietly about his Creator. He once told a friend,
"At no other time have I so sharp an understanding of what God means to do with me." Every Sunday at Tuskegee he conducted an afternoon Bible class,
during which he read the Scriptures and talked about God and nature.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 07:47 PM by OhZone
|
I see a lot of pussy-footing around the old Politically Correct "Maypole".
As the Doc says, we are applying our social standards to Africa, and it is not working. It has been noted that blacks are poor at managing their
governments. You have to know that For all those years that whites ran those African countries, that they must have had many, many blacks working for
them in various capacities.
Then the whites pulled out.
And the whole place degenerated.
Building and machine maintenance ceased... Why?
Because they didn't have a white boss to tell them to fix it.
Just how hard is it to figure out that when something is broken, that it has to be fixed?
Why couldn't they just go ahead and do it?
Why do they need someone to tell them to?
Take a look at the contrast between Haiti and neighboring (white run) Dominican Republic.
You can call it lack of intelligence or you can call it something else.
Fact is the basic premise of applying the wrong social policies to blacks is Correct.
[edit on 3-7-2009 by OhZone]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 07:53 PM by king9072
|
I think I learned this when I first started watching "The first 48" in which by the end of the second day 90% of the suspects are arrested and
charged, cause they blew some guys head off in broad day light out front of the liquor store, and leroy who has drug charges rolls over and squeals.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 08:03 PM by soldier8828
|
im just gonna keep it simple as usual...very very good post/thread and yea i think that there are some things that have to be accounted for like
genetics but the way the world is going right now how inter racial couples are being more accepted as opposed to maybe 10 yrs ago obviously....so we
wont have to deal with racial issues thank God! me personally its really up to the individuals want to be a better person in life.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-7-2009 @ 08:12 PM by mjfromga
|
Originally posted by ghaleon12
I've heard that even with cultural considerations taken into account, Asians still score better than any other group. Personally I don't care even
if that is true, doesn't really affect me. So really, the scientist could have said "white people are less intelligent" and it might be true and I
don't care. So to get worked up over this seems a bit childish, which some no doubt will. Statistics showing differences in height between groups
aren't that controversial...
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Whether or not this is true is certainly debatable, but is it worth debating? Casting one race/culture/class/sex as being more intelligent than
another is degrading to the parties declared inferior. I think scientific research of this nature does little to unite our world and can do a wealth
of damage by encouraging stereotyping and a sense of superiority. Can't scientific research be used for a higher purpose than this? ... I hope
so.
[edit on 3/12/2009 by sad_eyed_lady]
I think that is the wrong approach. Lets say it is 100% true. How would we change the education system to adapt to that knowledge? Wouldn't it be
better to know about a possible difficulty than to ignore it? They've found that race has an impact on how drugs are used by the body, wouldn't it
be nice to know if a drug reacts differently in an asian person vs. someone else? If you know of difference you can work to negate the difference.
[edit on 12-3-2009 by ghaleon12]
We are not allowed to group students by ability these days (except for gifted, special ed, AP or honor's classes). Unfortunately, this means that
many of the black students can't keep up with the other kids in the class and end up frustrated, behind, and finally drop out. Face it...the goal of
education should be to teach the material to the kids. Does it matter if they pick it up tomorrow or next month? But no, they don't get it and the
class moves on and they get further and further behind. We would rather not identify the kids and put them in the "low" group because it is bad for
their self esteem, but really...do the "experts" think these kids don't know they aren't keeping up with the rest of the class?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
<< 6 7 8 9 >>
|
|
|