Hardly breaking news I realise, but certainly alternative and well worthy of a debate. I just have to ask, as I will again at the end. Please be very
considerate when submitting responses, this should not excuse any hateful comments if you are a half intelligent person.
Although this is clearly a claim that should be considered extremely carefully, arguably never should have been spoken of in the public domain due to
inevitable use to spread hate by shall we say, lesser minded racist individuals, it is indeed thought provoking.
As it is indeed a purely scientific observation and evolutionary issue it should remain so, it’s very interesting evolutionary topic in any event.
It would be particularly interesting to see how people theorise this to have occurred throughout evolution, particular to the extent that would lead
an extremely respected and unquestionably extremely intelligent man to make such claims.
Colour is not the issue here, it’s purely regional. Colour is only used to denote peoples from a specific region and cultural background.
We all started out as white beings, (in my atheist belief system) early humans (hominids,) that originated and lived in equatorial Africa had a coat
of hair that covered their entire body that protect them from the Sun’s harmful UV.
After hundreds of thousands of years our early primate ancestors started to evolve (evolutionary processes) and hair production diminished leaving
their light skin exposed to the Sun’s rays, light skin that provided minimal protection. This therefore means a fair skinned person living near the
equator is susceptible to several health risks, such as skin cancer (melanoma).
On the other hand, a person with darker skin meant greater protection and therefore had a greater survival advantage (through increased Melanin.)
Thus, a process called Natural selection, filters out certain parental genes (those for lighter skin) in successive generations, producing offspring
with slightly different characteristics and less genetic variability.
My beliefs (Atheism and evolutionary) are the reason I post this without any fear of ridicule and/or being labelled a racist person, as through my
beliefs I do not feel it a need or necessity to possess a racist superiority complex of any sort.
The common consensus on this issue would raise an interesting discussion in my eyes, hopefully also leaving myself and others with an insight into how
others believe regional evolution may decrease or increase a given peoples intellect.
I would like to close my initial input with a reminder to some... this is an observation by one scientist only (that I know of.) Any given differences
I am sure are easily proven to be extremely small and not worthy of in sighting any hate or belief of superiority.
Please don’t make me regret raising this very sensitive issue, we’re all potentially above petty hate and maligned comments, please evaluate
comments carefully before submitting them.
www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)



