Black people 'less intelligent' scientist claims, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times
Topic started on 12-3-2009 @ 10:17 PM by MrAnonUK

Black people 'less intelligent' scientist claims


www.timesonline.co.uk
The 79-year-old geneticist said he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really.". He said he hoped that everyone was equal, but countered that “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true”.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.timesonline.co.uk
www.timesonline.co.uk


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 10:17 PM by MrAnonUK
Hardly breaking news I realise, but certainly alternative and well worthy of a debate. I just have to ask, as I will again at the end. Please be very considerate when submitting responses, this should not excuse any hateful comments if you are a half intelligent person.

Although this is clearly a claim that should be considered extremely carefully, arguably never should have been spoken of in the public domain due to inevitable use to spread hate by shall we say, lesser minded racist individuals, it is indeed thought provoking.

As it is indeed a purely scientific observation and evolutionary issue it should remain so, it’s very interesting evolutionary topic in any event.

It would be particularly interesting to see how people theorise this to have occurred throughout evolution, particular to the extent that would lead an extremely respected and unquestionably extremely intelligent man to make such claims.

Colour is not the issue here, it’s purely regional. Colour is only used to denote peoples from a specific region and cultural background.

We all started out as white beings, (in my atheist belief system) early humans (hominids,) that originated and lived in equatorial Africa had a coat of hair that covered their entire body that protect them from the Sun’s harmful UV.

After hundreds of thousands of years our early primate ancestors started to evolve (evolutionary processes) and hair production diminished leaving their light skin exposed to the Sun’s rays, light skin that provided minimal protection. This therefore means a fair skinned person living near the equator is susceptible to several health risks, such as skin cancer (melanoma).

On the other hand, a person with darker skin meant greater protection and therefore had a greater survival advantage (through increased Melanin.) Thus, a process called Natural selection, filters out certain parental genes (those for lighter skin) in successive generations, producing offspring with slightly different characteristics and less genetic variability.

My beliefs (Atheism and evolutionary) are the reason I post this without any fear of ridicule and/or being labelled a racist person, as through my beliefs I do not feel it a need or necessity to possess a racist superiority complex of any sort.

The common consensus on this issue would raise an interesting discussion in my eyes, hopefully also leaving myself and others with an insight into how others believe regional evolution may decrease or increase a given peoples intellect.

I would like to close my initial input with a reminder to some... this is an observation by one scientist only (that I know of.) Any given differences I am sure are easily proven to be extremely small and not worthy of in sighting any hate or belief of superiority.

Please don’t make me regret raising this very sensitive issue, we’re all potentially above petty hate and maligned comments, please evaluate comments carefully before submitting them.


www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 10:42 PM by Rockpuck
reply to post by hotpinkurinalmint



I have always thought the major differences where cultural then anything else, however as you point out there are obvious and blatant differences between different races. I would say that genetics can make us look different, there is no reason it cannot make us think differently as well. Whether someone sees this as a claim to racial superiority I would say is not looking at this in a scientific way, and thoroughly narrow minded.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 10:49 PM by MrAnonUK
reply to post by Rockpuck



It's also interesting to see in my eyes how a governments representative immediately comes out to claim that the words have no basis nor scientific foundations, I understand how they would not like this to be abused by narrow minded people but ultimately leaves me feeling once again that big brother doesn't give us feeble minded civilians enough credit.

I find that more insulting than the initial claims, almost suggest to me a distinct belief that we couldn't comprehend the conclusions. Which also makes it all the more fitting for this site as that is more than likely the very same reasoning for many of the UFO stories being kept away from the publics eyes.

The issue of the public not being able to handle certain issues without going into a state of massive hysteria has always angered me. God bless global communication and sites like ATS.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 10:53 PM by ghaleon12
I've heard that even with cultural considerations taken into account, Asians still score better than any other group. Personally I don't care even if that is true, doesn't really affect me. So really, the scientist could have said "white people are less intelligent" and it might be true and I don't care. So to get worked up over this seems a bit childish, which some no doubt will. Statistics showing differences in height between groups aren't that controversial...

Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
Whether or not this is true is certainly debatable, but is it worth debating? Casting one race/culture/class/sex as being more intelligent than another is degrading to the parties declared inferior. I think scientific research of this nature does little to unite our world and can do a wealth of damage by encouraging stereotyping and a sense of superiority. Can't scientific research be used for a higher purpose than this? ... I hope so.



[edit on 3/12/2009 by sad_eyed_lady]


I think that is the wrong approach. Lets say it is 100% true. How would we change the education system to adapt to that knowledge? Wouldn't it be better to know about a possible difficulty than to ignore it? They've found that race has an impact on how drugs are used by the body, wouldn't it be nice to know if a drug reacts differently in an asian person vs. someone else? If you know of difference you can work to negate the difference.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by ghaleon12]


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 10:55 PM by MrAnonUK
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady



I would have to agree, but I feel it is only true due to a portion of humanity being so narrow minded that they would use it to claim a superiority when clearly if genetics have produced any differences they would clearly be extremely small and insignificant.

It would indeed be idealistic though to believe this supposed knowledge could be open and not cause greater tensions amongst ethnic groups. A great shame, I wish everyone could fully comprehend such possible findings fully.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:01 PM by SLAYER69
reply to post by MrAnonUK



OK so we have one 79 year old scientists "Opinion". I'm wondering if he is old enough to still be slightly racially bias? I wonder if we can come up with some collaborating evidence? This will be an interesting thread to follow if nothing else entertaining.

I don't doubt that every race has it's less than average intelligence percentage I doubt they can simply throw an entire race into the pit.



reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:03 PM by MrAnonUK
reply to post by ghaleon12



What you say brings me to think, perhaps it's. Actually scrap that, surely it is cultural upbringing and influences which actually have a far more significant bearing on ones intellect.

For example, two twins are born in Africa. One of the twins then immediately move to the United States with the other one remaining in, shall we say Ethopia. The twin that moved to the United states will clearly, well surely produce better grades given the same examination in a neutral environment.

But, say you have two white twins. One brought up in a traditionally Northern American white family and one adopted by a very traditionally more strict Japanese family. I believe the child raised by the traditionally stricter family would by probability have a far greater chance of producing higher grades in a neutral environment.

Which in conclusion would certainly lead me to believe, any given differences as the scientist in question states would be extremely small and certainly near impossible to detect perhaps?


Edit; with the case where I mention the two white children seperated into different cultured families, I am imagining they attend the same school and receive the same education.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by MrAnonUK]


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:26 PM by Southern Guardian
I know of intelligent blacks, I know of unintelligent ignorant whites... I know of asians that are completely bad at numeracy skills... and vice versa. Its not hard for us to go around and find a smart black person or hear of one... I certainly dont find it that hard... I dont find it hard to seek out those idiot "gangster" blacks and then again I dont have to go so far to find your local clan... burning the cross of our lord... So the theory that "groups are different in intelligence" is complete nonsense... its more so when folks dont take into account various circumstances that need be fairly applied.

This guy is 79year right? Well he sure as heck is an aging breed in his way of thinking.. and thankyou for that.

By the way if this guy was really the smart scientist as he proclaims to be or what not maybe he would have figured that the difference between the human groups such as africans and europeans are at most 0.01%. Whats more so our external differences such as skin and nose and hair texture account for 0.0012%. Did you know that there are more differences among human groups within themselves than to those other groups genetically? So its kind of obsolete dont ya think?

Now if this guy saw another man walk down the street with a 0.0088% genetic difference but his external features were the same as those of europeans, do you think he would treat that many any different from other whites?

We could say the term race is "obsolete". I still can recognize the diversity in humans... the differences... and at the same time see through these race tags.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by Southern Guardian]


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:28 PM by theindependentjournal
reply to post by MrAnonUK



What's wrong with that? They are celebrating the birthdate of Charles Darwin this month for 200 years since his birth and 150 years since the publication of his famous book , Preservation of the Favoured Races.

Will this guy get a theory and a holiday too, he didn't say anything different than ole Charlie did in his book...

As a God fearing man I think it is abhorable that a human could think a race of other humans were any less or more than a any other race. But I aint an evolutionist and I don't claim we evolve from lower species, I claim Created us all equal, so this is appalling...

But I think it is fitting that we get some more Darwinism so close too his 200th Birthday - Happy Birthday Charlie, Love the mark you left on mankind, NOT!



reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:32 PM by MrAnonUK
reply to post by ghaleon12



I was considering asking if you would mind trying to dig that up for me but didn't want to bother you too much.

Thanks for that mate, should make interesting reading.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:43 PM by Mr Headshot
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
I would not go so far as to say one race of people is somehow genetically
For one reason or another, Black people seem to dominate certain sports like Sprinting and Basketball. Sure there are some fast non-Black people or good basketball players that are not Black, but if you watch the Olympics or the NBA, sprinting and basketball are dominated by Black people. I cannot say whether this is due to genetics, environment, social conditions, culture, or a combination of these factors. Nevertheless, the phenomenon is clearly present.


For the most part that's because of two things
1. They have been nomadic in Africa for a very long time and have become well adapted to hunting on the savanah aka running fast and having light muscle.
2. They were bred to be strong and fast during the time that they were slaves.

Same reason many white people are huge, their ancestors had to wield big axes and swords and survive harsh winters. For the most part whites aren't as atheletic because we don't need to be and haven't need to be for quite some time. We've become adept at making other people/things/machines/animals do the work for us.
This is where the "intelligence" comes into play. Intelligence is such a hard thing to measure because it's an abstract concept.
(sweeping generalities ahead so bear with me)
White people are great at building things, planning, and overall controlling stuff. Over the years we got really good at making war and building citys, some of us are pretty decent thinkers as well.
Black people (remember, very broad generalities) often don't think about "deep" things as much as we do, they're great for quick tasks and they can usually learn anything really really fast. I'm speaking strictly from my experience here. They have a really strong cultural tie usually and they often let this define them.

I'm not saying ANY of this is a good or bad thing, it's simply unbiased observation.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 16 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags
Evolution. Not a theory, but a fact!
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Evolutionary theory: Gaps and not yet understood phenonemon
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags