It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
10? well you think the same as me. Extremely rare.
Seth shostak reckons theres at least 10,000.
[edit on 15-3-2009 by yeti101]
And my problem with Shostak is not that he's a believer in Rare Earth theory (which it's pretty clear he isn't). My problem with Shostak is that even in the face of knowing what's out there, he insists that radio astronomy is the best way to find direct evidence of Alien Intelligence.
Surely, in all the billions and billions of solar systems out there, you don't think a single one has developed complex intelligent life forms, besides dear old Sol?
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
you seem to be really confused. I think tech intelligence is extremely rare not unique, Microbial life probably common, complex life less common. And its called the rare earth theory. Not the unique earth theory. They dont think theres only 1 either.
Originally posted by yeti101
kepler wont tell us if the planets are habitable or not. It might find hundreds none are guranteed to have complex life. It makes no diffirnce to the rare earthers how many kepler finds. We may have to find thousands before we find one similar to ours
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
lol just becuase the number sounds big in universal terms does not mean "common" you always take into account what your measuiring it against . 300 billion civs in the universe would mean 1 per galaxy. Not common at all.
10 civs out of 400 billion stars. That is classed as rare in anyones terms.
Originally posted by yeti101
And my problem with Shostak is not that he's a believer in Rare Earth theory (which it's pretty clear he isn't). My problem with Shostak is that even in the face of knowing what's out there, he insists that radio astronomy is the best way to find direct evidence of Alien Intelligence.
how far into space do you think $20 million doallars would get you?. What better ways do you have for searching?
Originally posted by yeti101
Surely, in all the billions and billions of solar systems out there, you don't think a single one has developed complex intelligent life forms, besides dear old Sol?
I've never stated anywhere in this thread that i think we are the only intelligent beings in the universe. I've held the same view for quite a few years.
Originally posted by yeti101
Rare earthers never said we are the only ones in the universe. They put it at 1 civ every 3 galaxies or something. So by your logic their book should be called "Common Earth" LoL i dont think they would agree with you nor would the rest of the astronomical community.
[edit on 16-3-2009 by yeti101]
Researchers have calculated that up to 37,964 worlds in our galaxy are hospitable enough to be home to creatures at least as intelligent as ourselves.
We are not alone: 'trillions' of planets could be supporting life:
Almost every star similar to the Sun probably has a life-harbouring planet like the Earth in orbit around it, a leading astronomer said yesterday.
The discovery of hundreds of planets around distant stars in our galaxy suggests that most solar systems have a world like ours that is capable of supporting life, and many of them are likely to have evolved it, according to Alan Boss, of the Carnegie Institution in Washington.
His expectation was that 85 per cent of Sun-like stars had one Earth-like planet, and that some could have many more. Given that there are 100 billion Sun-like stars in the galaxy, and 100 billion galaxies in the Universe, there may be 10 billion trillion planets that are good candidates for life. That is a one followed by 22 noughts.
“Still, statistically the probability that there are other thinking beings out there is good… Under Drake’s equation you divide the number of stars in a selected portion of the universe by the number of stars that are likely to have planetary systems; divide that by the number of planetary systems that could theoretically support life; divide that by the number on which life, having arisen, advances to a state of intelligence; and so on. At each such division, the number shrinks colossally—yet even with the most conservative inputs the number of advanced civilizations just in the Milky Way always works out to be somewhere in the millions”
Bill Bryson
"To consider the earth as the only populated world in infinite space is as absurd as to assert that in an entire field of millet,only one grain will grow"
Methodorus.
Greek philosopher of the fourth century B.C.
"Heaven and earth are large,yet in the whole of space they are but as small as a grain of rice.......How unreasonable it would be to suppose that,besides the heaven and earth which we can see,there are no other heavens and no other earths"
Teng Mu.
Chinese philosopher of thirteenth century A.D.
"The universe is infinitely wide.
Its vastness holds innumerable atoms....
So it must be unthinkable that
Our sky and our round world are precious and unique....
Out beyond our world there are,elsewhere,
Other assemblages of matter making other worlds.
Ours is not the only one in air´s embrace"
Lucretius.
Roman philosopher of the first century B.C.
"Innumerable suns exist;innumerable earths revolve about these suns in a manner similar to the way the seven planets revolve around our sun.
Living beings inhabit these worlds"
Giordano Bruno.
Italian monk of the sixteenth century (also burnt at the stake for these views by religious bigots).
"Looking at the stars always makes me dream,as simply as I dream over the black dots representing towns and villages on a map.
Why ,I ask myself,shouldn´t the shining dots of the sky be as accessible as the black dots on the map of France?"
Vincent Van Gogh.
"Why may not every one of these stars or suns have as great a retinue as our sun of planets,with their moons,to wait on them?...They must have their plants and animals,nay and their rational creatures too,and those as great admirers,and as diligent observers of the heavens as ourselves...."
Christiaan Huygens.
Dutch physicist and astronomer of the seventeenth century.
"It is precisely because I believe theologically there is a being called God,and that He is infinite in intelligence,freedom, and power,that I cannot
take it upon myself to limit what He might have done.
Once He created the Big Bang.....He could have envisioned it going in billions of directions as it evolved,including billions of life-forms and billions of kinds of intelligent beings...
As a theologian,I would say that this proposed search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) is also a search for knowing and understanding God through His works-especially those works that most reflect Him.Finding others than ourselves would mean knowing Him better"
Theodore M. Hesburgh ,C.S.C.,
University of Notre Dame
Originally posted by Merigold
Personally I believe there can be no doubt that life is not unique to our planet. Yet, I question whether or not there is any reason for life not from this planet to come here.
I don't think people really understand the distances involved and the level of technology required to travel these vast distances.
For die hard believers that think we're being visted, abducted and influenced well maybe it would seem like a "loss".
For myself knowing for a fact ( through some kind of scientific proof beyond any doubt) that life exsists would only be a vindication of what I already strongly believe.
Originally posted by DaMod
You also have to keep in consideration that we have no idea what an intelligent species (beyond our own) might be capable of. 1000 light years might take them 2 mins. I'm sure they use a more effective system of energy and they might have unlocked the secrets of the universe, space/time, quantum physics etc. They may have more efficient astronomy gear too! (Sort of like the Kepler telescope we just launched only way better). For all you know they might be able to use space time as a lens and zoom in on us from many light years away when at the same time we are looking back simply monitoring changes in light intensity to determine if their planet is really there. Just some food for thought.
"Warp drive isn't doable now, and probably won't be for the next several millenia," said Cleaver.
Originally posted by WitnessFromAfar
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by WitnessFromAfar
] It's like a high end retail store like Louis Vuitton. There are only about 10 of them on Earth, and there probably won't ever be any more than that,
-WFA
I have no idea why but this bothered me. There are almost 100 LV stores in the USA alone. So saying there are only 10 in the world is extremely inaccurate. You should do a quick search before you make a very false statement. Also by the way more stores show up yearly across the globe. Just read a little about LV and you will find this. Sorry I studied fashion and mostly LV so I guess that is why this little snippet bothered me.
Originally posted by GrayFox
I think that quote is a complete pile of crap. That guy completely underestimates the progress of technology!