posted on Mar, 14 2009 @ 06:36 AM
reply to post by JesusisTruth
yea but the difference is that homosexuals go against nature and live a lifestyle of lust for no other reason then lust.
As neither you nor I are homosexual we cannot know this from a personal perspective.
I don't judge how they should live, how an individual chooses to live is their business unless it harms others.
You choose to accept what you are told by ancient manuscripts written by men, claiming to be inspired by a god, the evidence for which is zero.
Going against nature is just your opinion ie th opinion of others that you choose to accept. If it is the case that you accept that homosexuals go
against nature then logically you would have to accept that other animals that practice homosexuality go against nature.
One animal that has an amazing sex life is the Bonobo and really gets stuck into gays sex, if we are to conclude then, that homosexuality is going
against nature, we must logically conclude that the Bonobo is going against.
Going against nature by your definition is going against god, thus we have to conclude that the Bonobo according to your logic has free will, or is
not created by your god.
If the Bonobo has free will then this would preclude the reality of your god, if the Bonobo is acting according to your gods design then this would
preclude homosexuality being hated by this god, or another creator was involved.
You simply can't have it both ways, and as you simply cannot the homosexuality hating Yahweh, is anything but a mythological deity that appers in the
bibles compiled at Nicea , then xtian bigotry is self evident.
No doubt xtians will jump through hoops and perform some amazing mental gymnastics, to get around the bigoted bibles, but nevertheless if hating some
of the actions of xtians is bigotry then hating some of the actions of homosexuals is also bigotry.