Army patrols downton Samson AL after shooting spree, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 06:48 AM by mf_luder
reply to post by TravelerintheDark



Deputized?!? No no no no no.

It's a form of ID, so you know they're MPs.

MPs (active duty) are law enforcement for real.

..... Deputies. lol

[edit on 12-3-2009 by mf_luder]



reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 07:02 AM by mf_luder
Originally posted by Ant4AU
reply to
post by pluckynoonez



Plucky piss of with your Alabama bashing, African Americans were treated like that everywhere.

As far as the troops it was a BS. There was no need in it. I haven't read this entire thread I couldn't got tired of your Alabama bashing could of been the NG could of been they thought more might happen.


I couldn't really figure out what the hell her rants about slavery (don't confuse me not caring about 200 years ago with "trying to cover it up" - I just really really really DON'T CARE... k? Thanks) had to do with any of the thread? Seems like it was better suited for another thread entirely.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 10:35 AM by Caminhando
reply to post by kdial1



Who do you call when the one intersection in town with a yield/stop combo is overwhelmed by single-car traffic...call in the army, of course!

Wasn't the guy who gunned all those people down dead at that point? So the need for excessive policing was......?

[edit on 12-3-2009 by Caminhando]


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 12:01 PM by on_yur_6
Originally posted by MetatronCubensis
reply to
post by pluckynoonez



Actually Alex Jones has an army Lt. Colonel from Alabama on the radio right now talking about it ...
it's completely illegal that they were there at all


Bush cleared the way and made it legal after Katrina. Nobody in the government ever seems to have any foresight. This is something that can be abused by a leader who the vast majority worship no matter what he does. Sound familiar to anyone? Time to go get more ammo!


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 12:48 PM by arcnaver
Originally posted by kdial1
reply to
post by TravelerintheDark



In the Military we have MP's, Master-at Arms...etc. These are equivalant to Police officers. Yes They wear police sashes. I am sure they are not Infantry soldiers. They have a specialty, which is MP. I agree that it is a small town and they were probably just assisting. I just wonder on who's order.

-Kdial1


Just a FYI. I know that MP's often are also required to be part of local Sheriff offices as deputies. They would often have to work shifts - as civilians - for the local Sheriff and often bases will have a 'mutual aid' pact with local law enforcement agencies, that allow them to 'AID' one another. Their is more then likely nothing wrong with what you are seeing. Those are more then likely MP's under the Mutual Aid Pact.

However, this day and age and this being a conspiracy board, your not going to believe their is nothing wrong.

Can you tell the difference between National Guard and Active Duty? Unless you are staring at their name tags, No, you cannot! They have vests on, how do you know they are not National Guardsmen? And often, National Guard will still have US ARMY on their blouses and not Nat Guard or a variation of it.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:49 PM by mcgilligan02
reply to post by sir_chancealot



Its funny that your ignorance is blind to the truth. Maybe you should of taken that walk instead of calling me ignorant. tsk tsk.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 11:51 PM by mcgilligan02
On September 30, 2006, the Congress modified the Insurrection Act as part of the 2007 Defense Authorization Bill (repealed as of 2008). Section 1076 of the law changed Sec. 333 of the "Insurrection Act," and widened the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States to enforce the laws. Under this act, the President may also deploy troops as a police force during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or other condition, when the President determines that the authorities of the state are incapable of maintaining public order. The bill also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or "those obstructing the enforcement of the laws." The law changed the name of the chapter from "Insurrection" to "Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order."

The 2008 Defense Authorization Bill, repeals the changes made in the 2007 bill. [3]

The 2007 Defense Authorization Bill, with over $500 billion allocated to the military, and which also contained the changes to the Insurrection Act of 1807, was passed by a bipartisan majority of both houses of Congress: 398-23 in the House and by unanimous consent in the Senate.[1] In order for military forces to be used under the provisions of the revised Insurrection Act, the following conditions must be met:

(1) The President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to--
(A) restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that--
(i) domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; and
(ii) such violence results in a condition described in paragraph (2); or
(B) suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such insurrection, violation, combination, or conspiracy results in a condition described in paragraph (2).
(2) A condition described in this paragraph is a condition that--
(A) so hinders the execution of the laws of a State or possession, as applicable, and of the United States within that State or possession, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State or possession are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(B) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 4 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 17 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 4 days ago with 70 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 13 days ago with 60 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 13 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags