Why I carry a gun or two!!!, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 11:11 AM by Snisha
Originally posted by NeuroStability
In my opinion, guns are for pussys[sic] that do not have balls or honour.



Originally posted by NeuroStability
Getting beaten up atleast[sic] once in life is essential.


So according to your brilliant rationale my uncle, who was a Marine in Vietnam and received a Silver Star for gallantry in action when he personally took out(while wounded) 11 NVA that were overrunning his artillery position(and killing his troops) was actually a "PUSSY" for choosing to shoot them instead of resorting to "knife fighting skills" or "fisticuffs"?????

Yeah, I'm quite sure that most reasonable folk would agree that there was not a shred of "balls" or "honor" in his intrepid actions on that particular day.

Perhaps this would have been the opportune time for him to take his "singular beatdown" that you feel is so "essential" for people to experience???

Please do continue your highly honorable and non-pussified
"Tilting at Windmills" now dear "Don Quixote de la Aussie"!



P.S. Upon further review I can't say that it surprises me that you make blusterous statements such as the ones I have cited above. After a brief perusal of your posts I happened upon this "Gem of Brilliance".....

Originally posted by NeuroStability
In my opinion:

Women are less intelligent than men.
Women are emotionally weaker than men.
Women cannot keep secrets!

Based on my conclusion, I don't think it is safe for woman to have too much power, for the sake of stability and progression of mankind.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply posted on 20-5-2009 @ 11:32 AM by LoneWeasel
Originally posted by NeuroStability
A car can be used to transport you, or as you said to run down people.

A gun can be used to shoot people, and too... And too... And... Ah, what else?


That's just not the point. A gun can act as a deterrent without ever actually being fired. Is a gun more intrinsically dangerous than a car? Yes. Is that in and of itself a reason for the overnight removal of all guns from an entire country? No.

I have posted on similar threads in the past in which I expressed with some force the idea that guns did not make a society safer. I would stick to that position. However, the anti gun lobby tend to portray gun ownership as inherently irrational and foolish, when of course it isn't that simple. In the UK we look on US gun laws with some bemusement, I think - almost as a sort of third world concept.

What you have to understand before you attack gun ownership in the US, I believe, is the hugely cultural impact of guns on people. The right to bear arms did not come out of nowhere, it was inspired by events in just the same way as the concept in England that one's home is one's castle, or in other cultures that certain foodstuffs are sacrosanct or certain landmarks are to be treated with reverence. I came to understand from reading the often passionate posts that railed against my point of view that there was a much larger picture to the debate than the slightly simplistic "Guns are evil/Guns are my fundamental human right" interpretation frequently presented by the media.

So while I still don't think guns make life safer, I no longer think of gun eradication as the end of the story - it has to be part of a sensitive, careful, socially aware policy that does not seek to confiscate, rather to render them obsolete.

LW
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israeli Company Has FAA Permission to Fly Drones in U.S. Airspace
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 6 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 17 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
America\'s Next Bomber: Unmanned, Unlimited Range, Aimed At China
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags