Originally posted by NeuroStability
Do you think they should be outlawed? If not, what beneficial use could they have in a society?
I do think that society's goal should be to outlaw guns, yes. However, it wouldn't be my starting point for addressing the problem.
I live in the UK, where guns are effectively outlawed and most people are happily able to live without fearing being shot. There's no question that
in the US, where gun ownership is widespread, people's chances of being shot are much greater.
What I'm suggesting is that though outlawing guns should be part of, as it were, the ultimate prize for society, it shouldn't be seen as the answer
to all the problems. For example, if you outlaw guns it follows that you should also outlaw knives. If you outlaw knives, eventually it follows that
you should outlaw sticks and stones. As long as someone is able to pick up a rock and hit someone else with it, the underlying problem remains.
Now, of course I'm not suggesting that a rock is as dangerous as a gun. I'm simply advocating a different approach to the whole issue - one that
seeks to address why X wants to attack Y with any weapon, rather than simply removing that weapon from X and pretending X won't find another way of
being dangerous.
LW