The Best UFO Case Ever! JAL Flight 1628 Over Alaska

page: 5
36
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Absolutely positively one of the best cases of all time.
I don't see where a debunk has anything to take hold of.

It's very cut and dry. The size of the object alone puts it into
a realm that throws the usual suspects used by naysayers, out the door.
Not to mention, the quality of the witnesses, the radar etc etc.
Fantastic.




posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by NightVision
Nope . sorry. Not the best UFO case ever. Not even close. Well put together though, and good presentation.



This could actually be a good and real case, so do not hurry to dismiss. Alaska isn't very inhabited land is it.. according to source that say aliens reside beneath the poles., one could expect something not usual to be flying around there. Just like Siberia and the Death Valley...



posted on Feb, 13 2014 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


I totally forgot, but my cousin Kevin lived on base in Anchorage in the 80s-90s and was a aircraft control officer.

Retired now it may be a good idea to speak to him. Would you be interested in what he has to say?

How about this, pose one or two intriguing questions for him about the JAL flight and I'll call him up.



posted on Feb, 13 2014 @ 08:08 PM
link   

AK907ICECOLD
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


I totally forgot, but my cousin Kevin lived on base in Anchorage in the 80s-90s and was a aircraft control officer.

Retired now it may be a good idea to speak to him. Would you be interested in what he has to say?

How about this, pose one or two intriguing questions for him about the JAL flight and I'll call him up.



Ask him everything he knows and remember about the case and spill it here.



posted on Feb, 24 2014 @ 11:30 AM
link   
I was watching an interesting program on ufo's and monsters in Alaska on the National Geographic Channel yesterday and they touched on this case. From my point of view this is indeed a solid hard to deny, unidentified flying object incident. I knew from memory the ufo was massive but I had no idea it was described as being the size of FOUR aircraft carriers. Wow. That's mind blowing. The other thing that stood out in my mind was the fact the JAL requested and was given ok to try to shake off the ufo and change direction, only to find after they did this, the object now seemed to be tailing them before disappearing. A fascinating sighting.
edit on 24am28am5091 by data5091 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 25 2014 @ 02:13 AM
link   
reply to post by data5091
 


data5091
I was watching an interesting program on ufo's and monsters in Alaska on the National Geographic Channel yesterday and they touched on this case. From my point of view this is indeed a solid hard to deny, unidentified flying object incident.

No one should be getting "factual" information from these hyped up television shows. This isn't investigative reporting, it's sensationalized reporting. They will skip facts of a story to make it seem like an exciting tale. That's what sells after all.


I knew from memory the ufo was massive but I had no idea it was described as being the size of FOUR aircraft carriers. Wow. That's mind blowing. The other thing that stood out in my mind was the fact the JAL requested and was given ok to try to shake off the ufo and change direction, only to find after they did this, the object now seemed to be tailing them before disappearing. A fascinating sighting.

What's even more mind blowing is the fact that the co-pilot and navigator never saw this enormous "mothership". Only the Captain Terauchi saw it. He also just so happened to see "motherships" two other occasions, admitting it was probably only lights of a distant town. Two flights were also redirected to JAL 1628's air space to identify this mothership. Neither of those flights saw anything once JAL 1628 came into view. These are only part of the facts conveniently left out of this incident by these shows.

Of course, once you approach this case and convince yourself it's real, most believers still won't waiver. Many believers don't actually search out facts and do any personal investigation. They will settle for what they are told are the facts. This is the problem.



posted on Feb, 25 2014 @ 08:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Ectoplasm8
 


To be fair, I have not received all information about this case just from ufo tv programs. I have also read in many books over the years, the same exact story, which has withstood the test of time.



posted on Feb, 25 2014 @ 08:18 AM
link   
reply to post by data5091
 


This has always been a favourite case of mine. Another good one is the 1994 ZImbabwe school sighting.





top topics
 
36
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join