tobacco tax obesity tax..what is next sex tax?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 06:00 AM by Astyanax
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
reply to
post by TheAmused


If they tax sex all us guys married over 5 years would get a REBATE a the end of the year!

Quite so. Sex is much to rare a commodity to be worth taxing.

Pornography, on the other hand, can be taxed and probably should be.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 06:04 AM by Solomons
Chocolate tax! news.bbc.co.uk... hopefully this falls flat on its face,dont eat chocolate much at all myself.But its a pretty ridiculous thing to tax..even though in the Uk we are slowly becoming as fat as americans.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 06:42 AM by autowrench
reply to post by Solomons



I live in Ohio, and roll my own smokes using Kentucky's Best tobacco. A one pound bag costs $14.95 before the tax, and nearly $40 after the tax. Around here only the poor smoke cigarettes, so this is, in effect, a tax on the poor. We are already having a lot of home invasions, burglaries, car thefts, and there are many street dealers here that sell drugs to make a living. How can TPTB do this to us without protest? I don't think they can, people are already protesting. If they keep this stuff up, all this taxation without representation, there will be repercussions over it. Didn't we fight a war over this kind of thing once before? I believe it was called the Revolution.



reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 08:28 AM by TheAmused
Originally posted by ChrisCrikey
reply to
post by TheAmused


Thank you, TheAmused. That's great information but what about obestiy>>/heart disease/diabetes/disability/mobilityproblems/blindness/amputation costs?


www.surgeongeneral.gov...
In the year 2000, the total annual cost of obesity in the United States was $117 billion. While extra value meals may save us some change at the counter, they’re costing us billions of dollars in health care and lost productivity. Physical inactivity and super-sized meals are leading to a nation of oversized people. # This year, more than 300,000 Americans will die from illnesses related to overweight and obesity. # Obesity contributes to the number-one cause of death in our nation: heart disease. # Excess weight has also led to an increase in the number of people suffering from Type 2 diabetes. There are at least 17 million Americans with diabetes, and another 16 million have pre-diabetes. Each year, diabetes costs America $132 billion. It can lead to eye diseases, cardiovascular problems, kidney failure, and early death.


So roughly 249billion a year.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 08:49 AM by TheAmused
reply to post by autowrench



Exactly my point.
Taxation with out representation.
Down to a Tea what we are dealing with tobacco Tax.

Different products same theory.

usa.russiansabroad.com...

Why did the colonists fight so strongly against the tax? The main reason was that the tax had been passed without their agreement.


A crap load of NON smoking politicians made this tax.
Therefor it is bias to tax smoke's this way .
Smoker's had no representation.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by TheAmused]


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 10:49 AM by TheAmused
americaisours.ieasysite.com...
Note to consumers: Possessing more than 20 packs (or two cartons) of cigarettes not bearing Tennessee revenue stamps is a violation of Tenn. Code Ann. 67-4-1019. Such products and any vehicle(s) used to transport them are considered contraband and are subject to seizure. Possession of more than 25 cartons is a Class E felony, while possession of more than two but less than 25 cartons is a misdemeanor.


Read Tennessee's law on smoke's...WTF
Felony for having to many cigarette's in you car and your from another state.

OMG Tennessee i Loved yall till that...
You ridge runner's have lost your mind.
Class E felony for over 2 cartoon's of smoke's from Kentucky or other state's.
And they seize your car ...OMG

Felony and they steal your car for 2 cartons of other state's smoke's.

My jaw has officially broke off and hit the floor.

I don't know what to say but OMG ..

[edit on 12-3-2009 by TheAmused]


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 08:51 PM by Albertarocks
Consider this folks! Carbon tax.

Contrary to what Al Gore says, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. It's the very gas that trees breathe to live. It's the source of their food, namely carbon.

The bastard tries to get the ill-informed mixed up between carbon 'di'-oxide and carbon 'mon'-oxide. Carbon dioxide is what you and I exhale. It's what trees inhale. Carbon monoxide is what your car exhales and yes, it is indeed poisonous. But he tries to spin the story to make us believe carbon DIoxide is poisonous so that they can tax anything involved with it. That essentially means a 'breathing' tax.

For for further consideration... since it is a carbon tax, is this only the beginning of another tax grab that they intend to rape and insanely burden our children and grandchildren with for eternity? God forbid they find out that without carbon, there can be no life on earth because without carbon... there is no such thing as organic life. That's what the word "organic" means, it means "carbon based" life.

Yes, you and I and your children and future grandchildren and trees and frogs and grass (both kinds) and whales and ants and mouses and kelp and corn and wheat and eggs.... you get the picture... are made up with approximately 25% carbon (depending on which method you use to make that measurement).

Where is this carbon tax going to end? I'll tell you when! It's going to end when we end the reign of these insane oligarchs in Washington, burn the Fed to the ground and arrest all it's owners, destroy the Council on Foreign Relations and jail all it's members, hunt down the entire Rothschild clan and whack their peepees real good... well, you get the picture.


reply posted on 17-3-2009 @ 10:47 PM by ThoughtMachine
reply to post by nixie_nox



The "beauty" of these things is that they're optional, eh? Technically, you could say that virtually anything is optional. Pragmatically, the story is far different. Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances on the planet, second only to heroin, if I'm not mistaken...and caffeine is up there too. The problem is that to the smoker, it's NOT optional. And while I'm not here to argue the merits of whether one SHOULD smoke or not, for many out there smoking is a way of life. Lawmakers, of course, know this, and these taxes are easy money for them. And, as usual, the burden will fall squarely on the lower classes. Thus, if you can *afford* to smoke, it's all fine and dandy, but those damn poor people are going to have to change their ways.

I'm affected both ways. I LIKE to smoke and I enjoy diet soda. I'm skinny as a rail and in excellent health (so I'm not a hedonistic glutton as an earlier poster envisions people). Like you said, these are optional, and I'd probably be better off without them. But to me, OPTIONS=FREEDOM. But financially, cigarettes are literally no longer an option for me. At one point, people in our country were more or less free (and that in itself is arguable), but now we're becoming a country of the more free and less free. So, I guess I should spend less time enriching myself and instead spend more time on making myself rich.
.
.
.


[edit on 17-3-2009 by ThoughtMachine]

[edit on 17-3-2009 by ThoughtMachine]

[edit on 17-3-2009 by ThoughtMachine]

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Memorial day thoughts.
  Posted 3 days ago with 11 member flags
Global governance and the challenge to the American Constitution
  Posted 11 days ago with 5 member flags
Abraham Lincoln Filed a Patent for "Facebook\' in 1845..? (HOAX)
  Posted 19 days ago with 3 member flags
Explosive Scoop on Obama from Breitbart.com
  Posted 10 days ago with 1 member flags