reply to post by nixie_nox
The "beauty" of these things is that they're optional, eh? Technically, you could say that virtually anything is optional. Pragmatically, the
story is far different. Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances on the planet, second only to heroin, if I'm not mistaken...and caffeine is
up there too. The problem is that to the smoker, it's NOT optional. And while I'm not here to argue the merits of whether one SHOULD smoke or not,
for many out there smoking is a way of life. Lawmakers, of course, know this, and these taxes are easy money for them. And, as usual, the burden
will fall squarely on the lower classes. Thus, if you can *afford* to smoke, it's all fine and dandy, but those damn poor people are going to have
to change their ways.
I'm affected both ways. I LIKE to smoke and I enjoy diet soda. I'm skinny as a rail and in excellent health (so I'm not a hedonistic glutton as
an earlier poster envisions people). Like you said, these are optional, and I'd probably be better off without them. But to me, OPTIONS=FREEDOM.
But financially, cigarettes are literally no longer an option for me. At one point, people in our country were more or less free (and that in itself
is arguable), but now we're becoming a country of the more free and less free. So, I guess I should spend less time enriching myself and instead
spend more time on making myself rich.
.
.
.
[edit on 17-3-2009 by ThoughtMachine]
[edit on 17-3-2009 by ThoughtMachine]
[edit on 17-3-2009 by ThoughtMachine]