I think it's fake... And a very bad one.
Adding to the fact that such a good picture (if real) taken by a science jornalist, isn't famous at all...... Doesn't had up any credibility.
First of all, the picture doesn't have a single point of reference about distance nor size...
It's just a single piece of the photo.
And analyzing the picture......
...This reminds me of the "doctor picture" of the Monster of Lockness. It looks really amazing and "clear", but it doesn't look real in scale.
In this case, the UFO seems very close (again, no point of reference) to the camera, and if you look below it, you can see the waves on the beach,
which gives you the feeling that the UFO is REALLY close to the camera, what is impossible according to the description and the drawing.
In the top left corner of the picture you see something... My bet it is something holding the FAKE object. The UFO is out of focus, but it looks like
it is out of focus because it's too close to the camera.
If he was a scientific jornalist he would KNOW the procedure to capture an event and do it with good credibility.
Besides, the positioning of the UFO to the description of the trajectory it took, it's not right.
he noticed an unusual metallic-looking disc- shaped flying objectcoming in at a low level over the ocean. It passed overhead(...)
If it was coming at a low lever
over the ocean, how the hell it passed overhead? And if it passed overhead, then why he took the photo with the
UFO at eye-level?
Nice find though... Flag.
[edit on 11/3/09 by Tifozi]
[edit on 11/3/09 by Tifozi]
[edit on 11/3/09 by Tifozi]