This is about common sense reasons that the manned moon landings seem way faked.
The ability to land and orbit robotic material and cameras to me, as well as most hoaxers seem totally plausible.
One thing I would like all readers to do is train their thoughts and ideas towards a man or men that NASA says walked on or drove around the moon.
This is the only real contention most hoaxers have in my opinion.

My biggest contentions that man never set foot on the moon are---

Why can't an astronaut get a good photo of his partner through his visor with a decent image of the earth in the back ground.
They had the ability.
If you check NASA"S abysmal record since all the supposed Apollo success, there is no way you could believe what they profess.
They would have you believe that they sent 18 or more men to orbit the moon, 240,000 miles away and 12 or so landed there and messed around for awhile. All this before they cooked or froze to death.
This was Outer Space!
Nobody has professed to do that for the last forty years.
They claim to have done this without the loss of a lab rat.
NASA has allowed the incredible loss of at least 14 wonderful, amazing people on shuttles in the atmosphere. Three were lost on the ground during Apollo.
Need I say more?

Just a few snippits from "MAJESTYTWELVE" by William Cooper

NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance.

NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. 2) NASA has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters. NASA claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will NOT evaporate destroying their own bogus "air conditioning" explanation.

NASA claims that the space suits worn by the astronauts were pressurized at 5 psi over the ambient pressure (0 psi vacuum) on the moon's surface. We have examined the gloves NASA claims the astronauts wore and find they are made of pliable material containing no mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical devices which would aid the astronauts in the dexterous use of their fingers and hands while wearing the gloves. Experiments prove absolutely that such gloves are impossible to use and that the wearer cannot bend the wrist or fingers to do any dexterous work whatsoever when filled with 5 psi over ambient pressure either in a vacuum or in the earth's atmosphere. NASA actually showed film and television footage of astronauts using their hands and fingers normally during their EVAs on the so-called lunar surface. The films show clearly that there is no pressure whatsoever within the gloves... a condition that would have caused explosive decompression of the astronauts resulting in almost immediate death if they had really been surrounded by the vacuum of space.

Originally posted by Phage
The guy doesn't have the faintest idea what he's talking about.

Actually, You appear to not have a clue what he is talking about.

One does not require any sort of in-depth technical knowledge in order to claim that the moon landings were conducted on a sound-stage using prop-suits that were nothing more than a facsimile of the their functional counterparts.

Glad to be of help!

*Now that I've pointed that out, I'll leave you alone so that you can destroy this poor fellow and his wonderful theories. ;-P




[edit on 11-3-2009 by Exuberant1]

Originally posted by Chadwickus

To those people, I spose the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array placed itself there huh?

Incorrect.

Such a mission could have been accomplished using an unmanned spacecraft.

You should know this.