Can Obama be impeached for sheer incompetence?

reply to post by WinoBot


It's just political partisans playing games.

We'll be hearing this drivel for the next four years.

The hardcore right may be a small minority, but they make up for it by cranking up the volume and pretending they represent a "silent majority"

Like any ideological cult, if you're not with them, you're against them.

Hardcore Marxists are exactly the same way, there just aren't as many of them...

Obama is way out of control, and it seems to me that Obama is bent on carrying out agendas he has been premeditating doing for many years!

I have prayed for Obama's protection and leadership, but Obama is not caring who he steps on!

Obama is pushing for many things that are destroying conservative Christians and the lifestyle of conservative Christians.
But, hey, Obama is here to change everything, and he isn't doing any of us good.

Obama is a liar!
How?
Obama tells us he is being fair concerning abortionists and homosexual agendas!
In the process, he is trying to give both of those groups power over conservative Christians because he feels it is the fair thing to do!
But, by doing so he is taking away the rights of conservative Christians.

Obama claims he is a Christian, but the agendas Obama is pushing into legislation are completely antichristian.
By trying to make Christians accept the homosexual lifestyle he is taking away our right to disagree with a lifestyle Jesus tells us is something we cannot accept!
By pushing for abortion and embryonic stem cell research he is trying to make Christians join in financial support of murdering innocent children!
Embryonic stem cell research has already spent over 3 billion dollars and years of research only to find that embryonic stem cell research does not work!
There has not been one positive use for such research!
There has also not been any use using embryonic stem cells!

On the other hand, Adult stem cell research has brought forth over 70 positive uses and has been used for more than 30 years!
Obama is trying to make us pay for research that only kills the infant!
And, Obama claims he is a Christian!
HA!
He is saying one thing, then he pushes for the complete opposite!
Embryonic Stem Cells are always rejected by the person they try to use them on!
This is MURDER!!!

Obama claims he is a Christian, but when asked if muslims should receive the Gospel to save their souls he claims there are several ways to get to heaven!
That is completely against the TRUE GOSPEL!

Obama is stealing from the taxpayer by giving the banks and auto manufacturers the money we have worked so hard to give!
The banks steal from everyone!
By giving that money to them instead of settling the taxpayer's money with the banks, he is just giving the money to the thieves!
Why didn't Obama get the taxpayers out of debt?
I wonder!

Let's see how much more Obama plans on taking from Hard Working Christians!!!

Obama is also trying to take from Israel what they have fought for so long to maintain!
Obama is supporting Israel's enemies!
Obama's actions support terrorists!

I thank Jesus I did not vote for him!
At least I can rightly say...
I told you so!!!
SaintlyMic

^ I rest my case.

This is not a one line post.

This is, in fact, a three line post.

reply to post by mental modulator


As usual, the hard core liberal mindset can't seem to wrap it's brain around the fact that the financial meltdown was NOT caused by one man. One man is not solely responsible for the mess we're in. Geez, even Time Magazine agrees to some extent on that when they published their piece "25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis".

Here's the link to the story, if you libs feel like educating yourselves for once instead of wallowing in ignorance.

www.time.com...

Originally posted by sos37

As usual, the hard core liberal mindset can't seem to wrap it's brain around the fact that the financial meltdown was NOT caused by one man. One man is not solely responsible for the mess we're in. Geez, even Time Magazine agrees to some extent on that when they published their piece "25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis".

Yeah, they're are lots of people responsible. That's why it is such a mess and I think instead of focusing on who is responsible, the ...responsible thing to do would be brainstorm as much as you can about correcting it. Friedman had a great post in the NY Times today with a great closing line.

"Which is why I wake up every morning hoping to read this story: “President Obama announced today that he had invited the country’s 20 leading bankers, 20 leading industrialists, 20 top market economists and the Democratic and Republican leaders in the House and Senate to join him and his team at Camp David. ‘We will not come down from the mountain until we have forged a common, transparent strategy for getting us out of this banking crisis,’ the president said, as he boarded his helicopter.” "

Originally posted by sos37
reply to post by mental modulator

 

As usual, the hard core liberal mindset can't seem to wrap it's brain around the fact that the financial meltdown was NOT caused by one man. One man is not solely responsible for the mess we're in. Geez, even Time Magazine agrees to some extent on that when they published their piece "25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis".

Here's the link to the story, if you libs feel like educating yourselves for once instead of wallowing in ignorance.

www.time.com...

What is it with you dehumanizing people with different political views - You sound like a nazi desribing the jewish "race" in the 20's and 30's, seriously... I am not an APE you 88.

I am not going to let JSO or you completely re write history, I am aware of the article you posted and I have read it already. I find it stupid that you and others would keep suggesting that a party and a president who do not believe in major government
intervention, all of a sudden adopted a liberal stance on regulation after the fact...

Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by Malynn

 

Originally posted by Malynn
This thread is high-quality entertainment. I (in real life, seriously) got up and made myself some popcorn. Herein this thread lies the evidence of why we are likely doomed. You all buy up everything they sell you.

Here you all are, getting all worked up and angry with each other. "My guy is better than your guy!" you all holler. Which is ridiculous because in reality both of your guys work for the same team. You're all working yourselves into a lather over two sides who are playing you against each other.

It's maddening at times. It's getting to the point where it's all turned into hilarity for me and I'm just kicking back with my feet up and enjoying the spectacle whilst waiting for the inevitable collapse. If we were an experiment, we totally freaking failed.

I'm glad you're enjoying the thread.

Unfortunately, I don't have a 'guy' in this thread. I may have defended against some of the allegations that this is all Bush's fault, but that is fact, and I have provided historical links and factual info from as far back as the '90s where this crisis had it's roots. Not to say Bush was innocent - he was no fiscal conservative - but at least he had a reason to spend the money, the Iraq war, with plans to recover some of it with Iraqi oil revenues.

But increased gov't spending can only be paid for by increased borrowing and ultimately increased taxes. When our credit line is shut down, the real bad times will start.

reply to post by djon01

 

That's a good idea!

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act, Pub.L. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999, is an Act of the United States Congress which repealed part of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, opening up competition among banks, securities companies and insurance companies. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited a bank from offering investment, commercial banking, and insurance services.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) allowed commercial and investment banks to consolidate. For example, Citibank merged with Travelers Group, an insurance company, and in 1998 formed the conglomerate Citigroup, a corporation combining banking and insurance underwriting services under brands including Smith-Barney, Shearson, Primerica and Travelers Insurance Corporation. This combination, announced in 1993 and finalized in 1994, would have violated the Glass-Steagall Act and the Bank Holding Company Act by combining insurance and securities companies, if not for a temporary waiver process [1]. The law was passed to legalize these mergers on a permanent basis. Historically, the combined industry has been known as the financial services industry.

The bills were introduced in the U.S. Senate by Phil Gramm (R-Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R-Virginia), Chairman of the House Commerce Committee from 1995 to 2001. On May 6, 1999, the Senate passed the bills by a 54-44 vote along party lines (53 Republicans and one Democrat in favor; 44 Democrats opposed).

en.wikipedia.org...


SO you were alluding to REPUBLICANS being all for regulation...

???

DID YOU mean 0 Republicans were for regulation?

I think the only way a president can be impeached is if he either, violates someone performing oral sex on him with a cigar while eating pizza, or stains that persons clothing during the event? Or maybe it's both? I'm not sure, that's a tough question when you really think about it?

No.
Don't impeach Obama.
Forget about putting Bush on trial.

Impeach the American Voter. All of them, including me.
And MSM's talking heads.

Afterwards, make them all take a Course on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, etc.

THEN, and only then, can they have their voter's rights back. Or their chair in front of the camera, in the case of the talking heads.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by spacedoubt]

reply to post by jsobecky


In Reply to the Racist.

Reason being, you probably didn't hear a peep from this guy while Bush was single handed in his decimation of the Government. As if running the deficit up another 2 trillion dollars during his term in office wasn't enough, but breaking most of the laws this country was supposed to be built upon. Not to mention most of the times you'd view him acting like an ass on Live T.V. because that's the normal George Bush in all his silly Glory... With no doubt in my mind that we'd be well into WWIII if he was still in office.

But speaking of incompetence... Wasn't Bush also rated the Worst President in the History of the United States? Oh but we just look the other direction don't we? Because he's White.

We all know the reason you really make your claims...

I bet Obama could Cure Cancer and you'd still find something wrong with him...

I wonder sometimes if people would respond the same way if Obama was fully white.

Funny how Bush was in office for 8 years and most people would say something like "he needs to get this country turned around. He's not doing too well with the economy. He needs to get it back on track"

All of a sudden now that Obama has only been president less than 2 months, it's "OH MAN!!! WE ARE SO SCREWED! HE'S DESTROYING THIS GREAT COUNTRY. WHAT THE HELL IS HE DOING????? SOMEBODY NEEDS TO IMPEACH HIM QUICK BEFORE IT GETS EVEN WORSE!! EVERYONE NEEDS TO STOCK UP ON GUNS, AMMO AND FOOD BEFORE **** HITS THE FAN!! HE IS AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT!!!!! I'VE SEEN ENOUGH! HE IS THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!!

Something tells me racism is alive and well. It really is sad




[edit on 12-3-2009 by doorbell412]

Here's a little food for thought. Your all slaves and don't even know it yet!
King Obama!

www.youtube.com...

Oh i forgot to mention, Obama is the 11th cousin of George bush. All the presidents are related in some way or another.Hmmm,i wonder what this could mean????? Wake up!

www.youtube.com...

way to make it a racism issue again guys!

reply to post by ManBehindTheMask


When your responses are racist... that makes it racist. Not us, but you.

Second, Bush destroyed America. Obama is trying to fix it. But notice how you, JSO, and the others ignore the white man who broke the television and are only yelling at the black repair man for not fixing it fast enough.

Originally posted by Zenagain

So let me get this straight. I make a post pointing out that the OP of this thread is trolling, and you guys censor ME and put me at negative 1k+ points? I'M trolling? Dear God. get new mods, this ship is sinking FAST.....

Originally posted by Brainiac
In Reply to the Racist.

:shk: Wanna try to prove that? Good luck.

Wasn't Bush also rated the Worst President in the History of the United States?

No. Not even close. Here is a site that has results from many presidential polls listed.

we just look the other direction don't we? Because he's White.

:shk: I could easily say something silly like .. you just look in the other direction on what Obama does because he's a man and you have some sort of hate-women thing going. That makes just as much sense.

We all know the reason you really make your claims...

Yes .. because Obama has caused a ton of damage in his first 6 weeks of office. The nitwit even called for discussions with 'moderate' Taliban. There's no such thing.

Originally posted by doorbell412
I wonder sometimes if people would respond the same way if Obama was fully white....Something tells me racism is alive and well. It really is sad

well .. people pulling out the race card when there is no need certainly is alive and well ... and sad.

Originally posted by JMasters
When your responses are racist... that makes it racist. Not us, but you.

You have not proven racism by the OP at all. But what you have proven is that some people love to play the race card when ever they hear Obamas lack of judgement and experience being exposed.

Second, Bush destroyed America.

Wrong. Bush, Pelosi, Barney Frank, Obama, and a whole host of people screwed up this country. And the voters that voted for these people contributed.

Obama is trying to fix it. But notice how you, JSO, and the others ignore the white man who broke the television and are only yelling at the black repair man for not fixing it fast enough.

What skin color these people have is irrelevant. What is relevant is what they do and/or don't do. Obama isn't trying to fix the situation. If he is really trying then that's pathetic. He's just making it worse.

How did he make it worse? Name three things made worse by Obama. Not made worse because he hasn't fixed the white mans mess up, but made worse by Obama. The stock market was crashing before Obama, unemployment was rising before Obama, the economy was falling before Obama, so find some thing that got worse after Obama.

Didn't Clinton get impeached for lying?
Obama has lied many times already to the public.
And not even about his personal life.
About policies.
Does this mean you can impeach him?

Originally posted by JMasters
How did he make it worse?

His 'fixes' make a bad situation WORSE.

- The economy has gotten WORSE under Obama. That's a fact.

- More unemployment under Obama.

- The markets have no confidence in him or the democratically controlled congress or the socialist bailouts. The market has gone down thousands of points since Obama was elected and thousands since he was inaugurated.

- Our deficit spending has gotten WORSE under Obama. This will have to be paid by our children and grandchildren. It will not fix the economy. Every dime he takes away from the people is one less dime they can spend on what is necessary. It's one less dime to stimulate the economy.

- Increased business regulations coupled with increased support of unions is WORSE for the economy and American business.

- He has been suckered in by (or is partnering with) Al Gore and the carbon credit scam based upon pseudo science that will hammer US business and will be bad for our economy.

- Bailouts teach bad business. A free market economy without the threat of bankruptcy is the same as Christianity without the threat of hell. It doesn't work. It teaches bad business. It encourages business behaviors that will fail. Both Bush43 and Obama are guilty in this area.

- He signed in PORK spending. Tons of it. Example - 50 million $$ to take care of Nancy Pelosi's mice in California is NOT stimulating the economy. And yet he stole our tax money and gave it to the mice anyways. This makes the economy WORSE. As I said - Every dime he takes away from the people is one less dime they can spend on what is necessary. It's one less dime to stimulate the economy.

- Intent to raise taxes on what he calls the 'wealthy' just to turn around and hand it to the proletariat to buy their votes. This kind of looting will cause small business' to close and will cause people not to bother to work any more than the bare minimum. Why work if the income will just be stolen by the gov't?

Upper Income Tax Payers Become John Galt
Rep. John Campbell and Atlas Shrugged
Sales of Atlas Shrugged Through the Roof


Reuters
The Washington Independent
John Galt
Bloomberg

fixed the white mans mess up,

:shk: OY!

Edited to add - you do know that Obama sued CITIBANK and forced it to give bad housing loans, don't you? Obama (who is not white) and his buddies at ACORN (people of all skin colors) helped cause the economic mess we are in through intimidation tactics. They forced banks to give bad loans. This is part of the reason we are in the financial mess that we are in.


[edit on 3/12/2009 by FlyersFan]