Well, the first video, honestly, looks like a cigarette lighter in the dark, moving somehow. The closeup and slowmotion shows the movements of
The second video is interesting...and confusing.
First of all, you can see strobe lights like you would see on a plane, and the timing in which they alternate is very consistent with strobe lights on
BUT, at the same time, the position of the strobe lights in relation to the "main lights" (don't know the word of the headlights of the
plane in english) is weird...
...the weirdest thing, that I (someone else maybe is able to do so...) can't explain, is why the 2 lights are alternating in intensity, and their
position to the flightpath.
Although I live in the flightpath of the planes to the airport and have seen thousands of planes at night, I never seen this happen.
And also, I can't find any explanation for the second light that apparently is "escorting" the biggest one.
So, nice finding!
The third clip is definatly CGI.
1. The UFO is behind the building. The building has the fog surrounding it, but the UFO isn't visually (at least, not in a reallistic way) affected
2. The UFO movement it's not very consistent with the vibration of the camera. It's too fluid and smooth to be real. It looks like the UFO moves on
your screen and not in the video.
But when it moves the second time, it actually looks more realistic. But the image is too poor to give away anything more.
After these two points, you have left the logical questions.
-If a UFO is hovering a few meters away from a huge building, there aren't any reports about that amazing sighting? (im assuming you don't have any
info on that clip) Not logical.
-Same as above, but apply it to the whole part of the city... You do see a lot of movement on the streets, and apparently that is a
-Why the hell would aliens have this kind of behavior thowards a simple helicopter, if we try to contact them without any kind of response? It's
hostil, or if they are "playing", it's a very agressive attitude thowards humans.
-If this was a skunk work project, why would they even risk such exposure?
I would love to get my hands on that piece of video, but in HQ, or at least, the first sample available...
But I have no faith in the third clip. Why?
Because it's amazingly similar to a commercial that Sci Fi used some years ago.
Hard to say Branty, the believer in me wants to do just that...believe but the third one is IMO CGI, the first one is questionable due to the lack of
focus( although cool none the less!) Star and flag for a good find , I'll wait for some more responces to come to a possible conclusion.
More damn irrelevant sound tracks. What is it that people feel compelled to add crappy noise to every video.
#1 Lantern or lanterns. It looks like flame.
#2 Helicopter at night in the far distance. Have seen similar at night from observation park at nearby airport watching Police helicopter chase a car
down a highway about 10 miles away. I know it was a helicopter because we followed it with the MkI from the chase to overflying the airport.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.