SCI: Tech Fears Arise Over Norton and Pifts.exe, page 11
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 267 times


reply posted on 10-3-2009 @ 10:33 AM by Armour For Victor
Originally posted by kuhl
reply to
post by Armour For Victor




Did you update it to ATS Media?


Um.....Im gonna say no. It was working fine earlier. Or is it something new you have to do?


reply posted on 10-3-2009 @ 10:38 AM by SpacePunk
reply to post by mrmonsoon



They came back up a few minutes ago.

I've already gotten three calls about this so far this morning. Good money says there's probably going to be a chain email 'warning' people about pifts.exe (that will never die), and probably a SNOPES entry by the end of the week.

Oh, yeah... RE2505, the internet tough guy line forms to the left.


reply posted on 10-3-2009 @ 10:38 AM by tommyboy1981
reply to post by FreezeM



no no harm to your pc but all your privacy is taken! seriously, why do we put up with this? somuch to privacy and freedom in our democracies! The companies who WE keep afloat have no respect at all for their customers!


reply posted on 10-3-2009 @ 10:40 AM by Armour For Victor
reply to post by ubermcnig



Mod edit please!
screwing my screen!



reply posted on 10-3-2009 @ 10:41 AM by FreezeM
reply to post by yetijones




The only things we know for 'sure' is that Symantec confirmed it is theirs. I really trust the people at Sans ISC when they say the spoke with Symantec. And that it appears to be 'calling home'. Maybe just to keep track of the number of successful updates. But it does contact stats.norton.com

isc.sans.org...
www.threatexpert.com...


reply posted on 10-3-2009 @ 10:46 AM by tommyboy1981
reply to post by FreezeM



No mate they can get that information by looking at the number of connections made to the server hosting the updates.

AT THE LEAST they are taking private information from there customers without any consent!

It is not necessary for them to access customers temporary files, cookies or history but that is what they have done!



[edit on 10-3-2009 by tommyboy1981]



reply posted on 10-3-2009 @ 10:54 AM by FreezeM
Originally posted by tommyboy1981
reply to
post by FreezeM



No mate they can get that information by looking at the number of connections made to the server hosting the updates.


That will tell them just the number of downloads. Not the number of installations.


AT THE LEAST they are taking private information from there customers without any consent!

It is not necessary for them to access customers temporary files, cookies or history but that is what they have done!


I am in no way defending Symantec here. I got rid of their products years ago. And I think it's wrong for them to collect any data from a pc and sent it without consent. But are we sure that they access temporary files, cookies or history and sent that to their servers? Or is that part just speculation. I have not seen any traffic dump.
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^