It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Huge Triangle Shaped 'Craft' Photographed By SOHO Near The Sun!!

page: 2
26
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 10:25 AM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 



yes i agree they are blooms but isn't there something there like a planet for the camera to create these blooms ?

i see that in the video i posted.

i am not saying these ufo's are alien spacecraft FYI




posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 12:05 PM
link   
reply to post by mikesingh
 


I wasn't referring to the "triangle". I was referring to the post by easynow. But if you read the link I posted you'll see that there quite a few things that create spots on the images.

It's telling that both the triangle and spots appear in a single frame of the sequence (you mean you didn't find it yet?). Very indicative of a "glitch", as you like to call it.

[edit on 3/10/2009 by Phage]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


As the link I posted explains, cosmic ray hits on the CCD produce the effect.



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 12:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


yes there is an effect no doubt but there is an object playing a part in the equation.




posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 12:31 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


Yes. Planets create the effect. But, no, there does not have to be an object. Anything that overloads the CCD does it. This is from the link I posted earlier.

from 2001/01/18 at 16:24 UT, taken from the public SOHO archive, with standard processing & color table. The circle highlights a cosmic ray hit.
sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...
Using a cosmic ray hit (no object), they create a "UFO" from the bloom.

[edit on 3/10/2009 by Phage]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 12:38 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


yes i understand that there does not have to be an object there in order for this to happen but since a planet can play a part in the equation so could any object.

my point is, you can't say every bloom is just a camera anomaly with no object in the equation.




[edit on 10-3-2009 by easynow]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 01:14 PM
link   
Not that I believe what I'm saying, but isn't the explanation from SOHO(NASA) just perfect for ruling out any, if not all UFO from SOHO pictures.

"Well...what you're seeing is not any form of UFO...it's just, to put it simply, glitches, caused by overloads. Nothing to see here people. Our explanation is indeed the truth. Have we ever lied to you before? Unless, you have technology similar to ours and you can do your own localized research about these glitches...you HAVE to believe us!"

[edit on 10-3-2009 by sdrawkcabII]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


But when an "object" appears in one frame of a sequence, it's a pretty good indication that it isn't an object.

[edit on 3/10/2009 by Phage]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 01:25 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Don't bother us with, with.....,with your Facts!


second line...What Lithgow movie is that in your avatar btw? He looks mental. Well more mental than usual.





[edit on 10-3-2009 by Nola213]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 02:46 PM
link   
If you look closely those so called 'triangular' objects are actually cut-off by a large red triangle on the corner of the image. You can see there is no image noise in the large corner triangle which indicates that it is a imaging issue.

It's really quite easy to see.



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikesingh
Here's something interesting. Two massive triangle shaped 'craft' photographed by SOHO.




You gave us a link to a page that displays some images that contain the exact same triangles in the exact same place in ALL of the images and you call them 'craft'.

I have read some of your stuff before and enjoyed it - this however is nothing short of ridiculous and you even claim a smudge of stars and blurred light is a triangle - well it is nowhere near being the triangles shown in the first 2 images and we know that they aren't 'craft'.

You are clearly not stupid - you must know that those triangles are part of the image formatting and not craft right?

How is this post not in the sin bin already?!

[edit on 10/3/2009 by skibtz]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 05:51 PM
link   
i came on here today because i saw a ufo as well
www.abovetopsecret.com...'

i was kinda an idiot with the pictures, so ignore them save for my last 2 posts.

whats going on with all these ufos lately? im convinced its our "future selves" looking back at us or something. it seems like something outta string theory.



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 08:10 PM
link   
how about some theories on the "semi circle"
seems too good to be true
I'm gona go right ahead and call it a force field.



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 08:58 PM
link   
Case closed surely?

Not a 1 liner (honest)



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 09:20 PM
link   
God! WOW!! as always Mike....spot on, bullseye! great thread. We'll get em sooner or latter we'll get em! keep em coming Mike keep em coming!!!



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Hi Mike,

I mentioned they are also visible in my thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...


I noticed a flareup and or Glitch on the 9th. I believe it may be a glitch.

-Kdial1



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 10:40 PM
link   
reply to post by skibtz
 

Do you ever bother to read the earlier posts before shooting from the hip? I had very clearly mentioned that those triangles in the first two images most probably are marks on the film itself and not UFOs. But I guess since my command of the English language leaves much to be desired, you may not have got my drift! Darn!

But the image in question now is the third one showing a triangle surrounded by objects in an almost perfect semi circle. [SNIP]

Cheers!


Mod Edit: Removed personal attack.
Civility and Decorum are Required

[edit on 12-3-2009 by Gemwolf]



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 10:52 PM
link   
Mike here is the one I was talking about in my previous post.

Lasco C2 2009-03-09 15:06

In this one it appears as though it has been edited out? Looks like it is in the same position as your 3rd picture. I don't know if it is coincidence or not, but it looks alike. Would be interesting to see if you could superimpose it on the other picture to see if it is in the place.

-Kdial1



posted on Mar, 10 2009 @ 11:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Nola213
 



Lord John Whorfin (Character)
from The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984)

IMDb

A very cool avatar choice!

I design CCD (and other types of) imaging systems (one of my imagers) and have been watching SOHO feeds since its birth. I don't see anything here that I would call particularly unexplainable as a typical anomaly. Not to say that's the case for sure, just that in my experience they are typical. I've seen anomalies form in circular patterns similar to this due to compression techniques but can't say for sure.



[edit on 10-3-2009 by dainoyfb]



posted on Mar, 11 2009 @ 03:28 AM
link   
reply to post by kdial1
 

Hi kdial1, Yep! It's the same area that's been 'blacked out', but remember that my third image was taken on 5th April 2000, 1106 hrs. That's a good 9 years earlier! Whether it was a glitch or a 'space craft', it would not have been in the same place in any case!

Cheers!



new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join