It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I was reading one of the threads Adolf Hitler and the Freemasons although there is no direct link to this we have links with him to the Jesuits and Photos.
"I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits", said Hitler... "Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church.
I'm sure Someone will come up with counter propaganda the same as the Hitler and Freemason thread saying he wasn't a practicing Catholic etc but a picture says a thousand words.
The current pope and his brother were affiliated to Nazis as per the page this would be unthinkable for any other Church in the World to have a leader like this apart from Rome but he will say he got forced into it Bull.
I would like peoples thoughts on the information provided and to determine the close links of the Nazis, Jesuits and Roman Catholic Church. David
In April 1983, the German news magazine Stern published extracts from what purported to be the diaries of Adolf Hitler, which were subsequently revealed to be forgeries. The magazine had paid 10 million German marks for the sixty small books as well as two "special issues" about Rudolf Hess's flight to the United Kingdom, covering the period from 1932 to 1945.
Stern submitted them for review by a number of experts in World War II history, notably the historians Eberhard Jäckel and Gerhard Weinberg. The diaries were declared by these experts to be authentic, and Stern began an international auction process for serialisation- and publication-rights.[
[Famed British] historian Hugh Trevor-Roper, was convinced of their authenticity: "I am now satisfied that the documents are authentic; that the history of their wanderings since 1945 is true; and that the standard accounts of Hitler's writing habits, of his personality and, even, perhaps, of some public events, may in consequence have to be revised."
However, [by] April 25, 1983, doubts had begun to emerge about their authenticity. Within two weeks the Hitler Diaries were revealed by Dr Julius Grant as being "grotesquely superficial fakes" made on modern paper using modern ink and full of historical inaccuracies. "Some point out that the most obvious fakery was the monogram on the title page reading 'FH' instead of 'AH' (for Adolf Hitler) - Content had been largely copied from a book of Hitler's speeches with additional 'personal' comments. [Noted World War Two] historian Hugh Trevor-Roper's reputation was seriously damaged.
The diaries were actually written by Konrad Kujau, a notorious Stuttgart forger. Both he and Heidemann went to trial in 1985 and were each sentenced to 42 months in prison.
Good reply my friend, I thought their would be more people with opinions on this subject trying to discredit what I have said or posted. Obviously you cant argue with the pictures their's no denying the obvious links between the groups, Jesuit priests double up as Nazi murderers Shame on them. David
I saw on a history channel program something like "Nazis and the occult" that while Hitler was seizing power some of his propaganda was directed against fraternal organizations specifically the freemasons, He saw them as a threat and eventually them and other organizations were not allowed to meet in Nazi Germany.
Originally posted by orangeman dave
I was reading one of the threads Adolf Hitler and the Freemasons
Can I ask a question of you being Born and Bread a Roman Catholic do you believe their is a link between The Roman Catholic Church/Jesuits and the Nazis. I get called an Anti-Catholic when I post threads on this subject, but it would be good to hear a Roman Catholic defending me for once and saying it how it is. Many Thanks David
Good topic and thanks donwhite for your usual well-thought and information-rich posts. As I look back on history, it becomes clear to me that: 1: Jesuits conspired to kill Abe Lincoln after he defended Chiniquay.
Originally posted by donwhite
Thanks for the kind words, Mr S/P. It seems all too many of our super tragic moments are so mucked up by the by-standers that after th fact it is neigh on to impossible to know what happened or who did what.
On Chiniquay, see this link: www.sdadefend.com...
The Rt. Rev. Foley, Bishop of Chicago on December 30, 1880 translated the following law and swore before the court of Kankakee that it was promulgated by St. Thomas Aquinas as an unchangeable law of the church of Rome.
"Though heretics must not be tolerated because they deserve it, we must bear with them, till, by a second admonition, they may be brought back to the faith of the church. But those who, after a second admonition, remain obstinate in their errors, must not only be excommunicated, but they must be delivered to the secular power to be exterminated." St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologia, Vol. iv. p. 90.
Thutmose IV's rule is significant because he was the New Kingdom pharaoh who established peaceful relations with Mitanni and married a Mitannian princess to seal this new alliance. Thutmose IV's role in initiating contact with Egypt's former rival, Mitanni, is documented by Amarna letter EA 29 composed decades later by Tushratta, a Mittanian king who ruled during the reign of Akhenaten, Thutmose IV's grandson. Tushratta states to Akhenaten that:
“ When [Menkheperure], the father of Nimmureya (ie. Amenhotep III) wrote to Artatama, my grandfather, he asked for the daughter of my grandfather, the sister of my father. He wrote 5, 6 times, but he did not give her. When he wrote my grandfather 7 times, then only under such pressure, did he give her. (EA 29)
Therefore, it is assumed that Babatha was near Ein Gedi in 132 CE, placing her in the midst of the Bar Kokhba's revolt. It is likely that Babatha fled with Miriam and her family from the imminent violence of the revolt. Because the documents were never retrieved and because twenty skeletal remains were found nearby, historians have suggested that Babatha perished while taking refuge in the cave.
as the content of the "De Die Natali" of Censorinus testifies : "The beginnings of these eras are always taken from the first day of that month whose name among the Egyptians is Thoth, which day in the current year was vii kalends July (= June 25) and which 100 years ago [in 139 AD Julian] under the second consulate of the emperor Antonius the Pius and that of Bruttius Praesens fell on xiii kalends August (= July 20), at which time the Dog-star (Sirius) was accustomed to rise in Egypt. Thus, we see that we are today in the 100th year of that Great Year (Era) which, as has been said above, is called "Solar Year", "Year of the Dog-star", and the "Year of god"."
Censorinus effectively deduced from the fact that at his time, that is to say, in 239 AD, the civil date Thoth 1 fell on vii kalends July (June 25), that some 100 years earlier, that is to say, in 139 AD, it must have fallen on xiii kalends August (July 20). The use of the software allowing to determine the day of heliacal rising of any star visible with the naked eye indicates that the heliacal rising of Sirius occurred on July, the 20th, 139 AD, at Memphis. No other Egyptian place effectively fulfils this temporal criteria, which proves that Censorinus refers to the memphite sighting of this celestial event.
The main human attribute that corporations lack is a soul, as Roger Manwood, chief baron of the Exchequer, noted as early as 1592. Since the corporations themselves, and not their souls, were immortal, they were not held accountable to the moral standards that applied to individual people. "Corporations cannot commit treason, nor be outlawed," wrote the great English legalist Edward Coke, "for they have no soul." Or as English lawyer Howel Walsh put it, "a corporation cannot blush." Thus the corporations' moral inadequacy amounted to a significant legal advantage, one of many they have accrued.
In fact, special dispensations, exemptions, and privileges of every kind imaginable are the life's blood of the corporation. Corporate members enjoyed various privileges during Roman times, such as curial immunity, and organizational privileges are evident as early as 628 A.D. in the ecclesiastic orders of the Catholic Church, the first great corporations of the post-Roman era. Modern English and French law traces the secular corporation to the concept of "franchise," which is the French Norman word for privilege.
Over the centuries, these privileges have been nurtured, entrenched, and expanded. You can get some idea of this corporate favoritism when you realize that no American corporation was indicted -- let alone convicted -- for murder until 1978. Criminal law is really a sidelight, though. The place where corporations enjoy their biggest advantage is tax law. During the height of the Reagan era, 50 of the largest business corporations in America avoided paying any federal income tax. In many ways, modern corporations are analogous to the aristocracy of the ancien regime.