It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kegsLOL, you have to resort to cultural stereotypes? That says a lot. What the hell has me being Scottish got to do with anything? But lets see anyway.. the Scots have contributed nothing? Well apart from forming the U.S navy and the fact that well over a third, and by some estimations as many as three-quarters, of the fifty-six signatories for the declaration of independence were Scots-born or had some Scots ancestry we've invented the steam engine, the bicycle, tarmacadam roads, the telephone, television, the transistor, the motion picture, penicillin, electromagnetics, radar, insulin, calculus, the first cloned animal, Anaesthetics, Antiseptics, the Decimal Point, fax machines, Geosciences, golf, Iron Bridges, the Kelvin scale, Logarithms, paraffin, adhesive postage stamps, economics, hypodermic syringes, Pneumatic Tyres, quinine, refrigerators, thermos flasks, sulphuric acid, telegraph and of course, whisky.
And there's lots more; as well as being world famous for philosophy and journalism. Not bad for a country of less than 5 million.
Perhaps it wouldn�t be to churlish to point out that you obviously don�t know what you�re talking about, whereas you�re just guessing as to what I know. Don't you hate it when assumptions bite you in the ass?
Originally posted by Condorcet
I'm guessing the massacre of civilians at Fallujah is part of a deliberate attempt by the US to provoke a violent reaction by Iraqis.
Originally posted by Jakomo
War kills innocents, so if you start the war, you take responsibility for that.
Originally posted by Jakomo
I guess we read different news sources.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
attrition is a small price to pay in order to win a war. besides, terrorists sure have no problem killing innocent civilians.
and i know that drill segeants say things like that to toughen people up. they treat their men like # to make them obedient and desensitize them. it's a psychological thing.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Er, why don't you check out the author's credentials before you slam him.
I did.
"Rahul Mahajan is the publisher of Empire Notes and serves on the Administrative Committee of United for Peace and Justice, the nation's largest antiwar coalition. His first book, "The New Crusade: America's War on Terrorism," has been called "mandatory reading for anyone who wants to get a handle on the war on terrorism," and his most recent book, "Full Spectrum Dominance: U.S. Power in Iraq and Beyond," has been described as "essential for those who wish to continue to fight against empire." He can be reached at [email protected] "
I have read it, have you? I was not at all impressed with his writings. He cleary showed a one sided view of the war on terrorism.
And check out his Iraq blog
www.empirenotes.org...
[Edited on 19-4-2004 by Jakomo]
Originally posted by Jakomo
What do you specifically see on this site that makes you believe this is, as you put it, one-sided?
Umm, the first line alone:
"America's best Political Newsletter" By Out of Bounds Magazine. That doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy that I am about to get unbiased reporting. That article is full of heresay, as is his books. Notice that he himself have not seen any of these things actually happen, just the people who refuse to have names printed.
If someone doesn't have the same opinion as you, you call it a one-sided argument? Your argument is far more one-sided than his. And much less understandable.
No, I call it one sided because that is how he presents his articles (and books). Have you read either of the books that you pointed out. I asked you that last time and you dodged it.
jak0
[Edited on 19-4-2004 by Jakomo]
Originally posted by Jakomo
"On the other hand, on the way to Fallujah, at a checkpoint near Abu Ghraib prison (used first by Saddam, now by the United States), we saw truckloads and truckloads of lumber and other materials being driven in vehicles that clearly belonged to the U.S. military. It was all for building detention facilities. Since 9/11, the United States has embarked on the building of a global Gulag Archipelago; Guantanamo has gotten the most attention, but the number detained in Iraq is far greater. An administration that can build prisons but not schools or hospitals in the United States can build prisons but not schools or hospitals in Iraq."
Your friend in Iraq would corroborate this, as do other sources on the net.
No, my friends do not corroborate on that. Plus, did he see the final destination for that material? No, he made a guess. You can't deny that. I am sure that if he saw all of these prisons for himself he would have put pictures of them in his book or site. Alas they are not there.
I don't know about you, but I see this as an eye-opener. And, again, corroborated all over the place on the Internet, and not in just blogs, but by respected
newswires.
Then please post some links to those places.
And no I haven't read his books.
How can you defend him against what I am saying? You haven't even read the books that you used as evidence.
And when he says stuff is secondhand knowledge he says "it's secondhand knowledge" or "I am working on corroborating this", he doesn't try to mislead.
Funny, he never says that in his books.
jako
"On the other hand, on the way to Fallujah, at a checkpoint near Abu Ghraib prison (used first by Saddam, now by the United States), we saw truckloads and truckloads of lumber and other materials being driven in vehicles that clearly belonged to the U.S. military. It was all for building detention facilities."