It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Humans are Now Physically Evolving Faster and Faster than Ever Recorded.

page: 2
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 11:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Schmidt1989
Nature also gave us an appendix.


And a good thing it did, because without the appendix we would not be able to regrow the bacteria that in symbiosis with us digest the food should we be hit by some sort of food poisoning or other intestinal disorder that causes us to spasm the contents of the digestive tract out, which would make us less vital in the aftermath.

Just because some people say it's wrong dosen't mean nature didn't get it right.




posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 11:32 AM
link   
Reply to topic: There are more humans alive now than probably were alive throughout the whole of known human history on this planet. It's not evolution it's diversity.

Show me two populations that can't interbreed and we can start talking about human evolution. Untill then I'll just wait in the hope that we have some evolution of thought which uplifts us into a species with common sense



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 11:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Salt of the Earth

Pure crap.

It is based on Darwinian "survival of the fittest" hokem. Since the evolutionists are unable to come up with even one missing link, not just of humans but of any other creature, not one fossil showing a reptile growing feathers



Have to break it to you ... but that is incorrect ...

Archaeopteryx

Oh but wait ... maybe the Zionists created the fossil of Archaeopteryx and it is all a hoax made by them ...


edit: to add the ripping and sarcasm

[edit on 9-3-2009 by george_gaz]



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 12:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Salt of the Earth
 


Darwins theory of evolution was never about the fittest, it was about the most adapatable.

Consider that many of the people who died during the influenza pandemic of the early 1900's were very fit. It should also be noted that survivours had previously contracted a milder form of the virus and were often old and unfit.

Adaptation is the key to evolution, which is different from survival as an individual. Humans are devolping but not as in these eugenic driven fantasies.

Perhaps because nature sticks to the old adage if it aint broke...



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 12:35 PM
link   
Law of Accelerating Returns, my friends.

Sooner much rather than later, we are going to begin to experience an exponential growth in evolution that will multiply at a rate never before seen with our society.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 12:45 PM
link   
Lets hope we turn out better



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 12:50 PM
link   
Can't you already start seeing these changes? That our minds are becoming significantly more adaptable. That the period of mental plasticity is extending. Children's bodies are changing. As a group, in most cultures that are not dealing with massive nutrient/caloric starvation, children are getting bigger. Even in groups that are not participating in the bovine growth food / modified foods found all over. Girls particularly are showing this. Girls' bodies are getting bigger.

While a large herd accelerates the changes, the depopulation of said herd alos ENTRENCHES those changes which lead to the best survivability. Over time the best trait humans have shown is that our survival is directly tied to our adaptability. Those who survive massive depopulations form the basis of all the new people with those traits.

Viruses are contributing to the changes we see. Not just be being a survival selector but also because quite a few viruses insert pieces of themselves into our chromosones and then we pass those on. Fungi/Bacteria spread their information on survival from one to another across the planet in amazing time. We use viruses the same way. Viruses are keeping the herd moving in the same general direction. As our mutations happen, viruses provide a way of maintaining herd genetic cohesiveness over the entire massive herd.

[edit on 2009/3/9 by Aeons]



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by george_gaz

Originally posted by Salt of the Earth

Pure crap.

It is based on Darwinian "survival of the fittest" hokem. Since the evolutionists are unable to come up with even one missing link, not just of humans but of any other creature, not one fossil showing a reptile growing feathers



Have to break it to you ... but that is incorrect ...

Archaeopteryx

Oh but wait ... maybe the Zionists created the fossil of Archaeopteryx and it is all a hoax made by them ...


edit: to add the ripping and sarcasm

[edit on 9-3-2009 by george_gaz]


The archeopteryx was a complete animal, not evolving in any way.

We have never seen an animal in the progress of evolving nor found any fossils of animals evolving, say the example I gave, scales turning into feathers, or little stumps starting to bud out on a worm, something like that.

Every single thing we see in nature is complete as it is. Nothing is partially formed. Nothing.

The archeopteryx is no exception. There are strange animals that seem to be part this and part that, like the platypus, but those are complete animals, nothing changing or incomplete in them at all.

So the joke is on you.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Salt of the Earth
 


what if something can evolve to evolve fast? or what if evolution is gradual but it only activates when necessary- like a type of preparedness(i.e. hey! the ground is becoming water, let us become mini and fly!). ah well, just my 2



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:17 PM
link   
reply to post by Salt of the Earth
 


Actually, you should check out some of the research being done by European scientists. Yes, some dinosaurs did evolve into birds.

The proof is in the many stages of the fetus.

The theory is as a species evolves they, say, a modern bird should still carry those old, dormant genes.

Birds like the emu apparently do carry those genes, and scientist are re-creating dinosaurs by adding enzymes to the eggs of emus to activate old genes and de-activate the newer ones.

Just taking note of the fetal stages of the emu you can see the old genetic traits that they once carried. They were in fact very dinosaur looking.



www.youtube.com...

[edit on 3/9/2009 by dalan.]



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Well isn't this obvious since there are more of us? More pregnancies = more mutations it's just basic maths, give me the hundreds of thousands it cost for this report.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Wisen Heimer
 


Interesting. This supports the aliens as actual humans of the future theory.

I sometimes wonder if we are actually evolving into the aliens that we know of today? I mean if they come from another dimension. What happens if lets say we had a time machine and we went forward in time from where we were currently at. Lets say if you lived in New York and you sped ahead of time of what it would be like in the future. Only to come out and see that we are motionless people with huge tinted eyes and only spoke from the brain.

If that is the case. We will evolve where strength doesn't matter. Technology matter thus explaining the skinniest of the grey's. Knowledge becomes the power, we know all therefore curing disease, cancer, exercise not needed because we have the mind and technology to eliminate it. We would use the abilities to speak telepathy since our minds are so powerful, speech would not be needed. If you look at the characteristics of a human and a grey. There isn't much difference. We both have eyes to see, I guess nostrils to breath, mouths to eat? < I question this because this isn't confirmed what greys eat. Some say they eat humans.... so. Though we lose our expressions in our face, our noses. We will have advance seeing with how big those eyes are.

That is if that is the case, not saying we are greys.

But at the same time it is scary. These greys don't have emotion, it is like if we were the greys of our future and if we did evolve we would lose this feeling. I wonder if we would lose the feeling of love as well? Only extracting semen from our bodies and have it produce through a tube or some sort? Maybe that is why these galaxy dwellers kidnap humans to breed with us to either to keep their species alive or in this case to become human again? That is why we have half breeds?

But from my understanding these half breeds look like humans but not fully evolved as them? Because they are once again motionless with no emotion and just look like us?

What happens if that was the case? To become human again, because they want that emotion again? They can have all the knowledge in the world, but not understanding what it all means with feeling is a powerful thing that you would want to feel if you were something that had no feelings only advanced knowledge right?

Because feelings in my opinion show more than knowledge. This is something that should be really considered to be looked at.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Wisen Heimer
 


This group of researches gets it's funding from? Adaptive responses are programed into our DNA. Adaptive responses like bone mass and density, brain protection from disease and infection are all programmed into us.

Obesity is also an adaptive response to over eating and (inactivity) which itself is usually a response to depression and stress caused by government oppression.

There is still no proof of evolution here folks. The most harmful mutation is the one that causes people to believe evolution is a proven fact, when in fact it is simply a feeble explanation for some evidences that are more reasonably explained by the creation science model.

Nothing to see here people. Just another over zealous gov. funded research group trying to justify more funding and grant money.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:44 PM
link   
reply to post by sunny_2008ny
 


Why do you expect digestion to become more efficient? With lactose intolerance and expanding nut allergies (and other foods as well), I would expect the opposite to be true.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by dalan.
 


Dinosaurs from birds.....Ba!! The fact that there are some similarities, even at the genetic level, demonstrates a common designer.

There is NO evidence that one species has crossed over to become another species.

Evolution is fantasy and it has not nor can it be proven. It's an explanation for the evidence we have and nothing more.

The exact same evidence fits into the creation model without the need for secondary assumptions as new evidence comes forth(which almost always cause the evolutionists to rewrite things to tell a new and different story).
The evolution story gets more outrageous everyday with each new secondary assumption and change of the story.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Solomons
 


Didn't you mean, Homo neanderthalis? www.counterbalance.net... They definitely had larger brains than modern humans. Homo erectus had a brain size of approximately 900 cc vs. 1350 cc for modern humans: www.archaeologyinfo.com...

[edit on 9-3-2009 by X-tal_Phusion]



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 01:59 PM
link   
This is pretty misleading. All of the examples given in the OP are not "evolution." They are just changes in gene expression. Kind of like breeding dogs. Nothing NEW; merely different breeding habits making different genetic aspects more prevalent.
More bad science.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by John Matrix
reply to post by dalan.
 


Dinosaurs from birds.....Ba!! The fact that there are some similarities, even at the genetic level, demonstrates a common designer.

There is NO evidence that one species has crossed over to become another species.

Evolution is fantasy and it has not nor can it be proven. It's an explanation for the evidence we have and nothing more.

The exact same evidence fits into the creation model without the need for secondary assumptions as new evidence comes forth(which almost always cause the evolutionists to rewrite things to tell a new and different story).
The evolution story gets more outrageous everyday with each new secondary assumption and change of the story.


The point is that if some dinosaurs had not evolved into birds then you would not be able to do the genetic back-tracking in the first place because those traits would not be there.

But as a fetus is forming in the womb ( or egg) it goes through ALL of the evolutionary stages very rapidly.

It starts out as a single-cell organism then climbs the ladder from there. It is all in the stages of the fetus, and the fetus of the emu clearly show its whole species earlier evolution.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by saturnine_sweet
This is pretty misleading. All of the examples given in the OP are not "evolution." They are just changes in gene expression. Kind of like breeding dogs. Nothing NEW; merely different breeding habits making different genetic aspects more prevalent.
More bad science.


That is evolution.



posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by dalan.
 


Um, might want to check your bible of naturalism there. That statement is no longer even endorsed by the priesthood of Darwin. That was all based on some fake sketches and long since debunked by everyone.




top topics



 
16
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join