Originally posted by neo67
i say agian when liberals throw military recruiters of college campuses if you have a negative viewpoint of what this guy did you have no ground to
stand on.
Apples to oranges.
I think that the people who are looking at this situation with the firearms instructor are commenting on the illogic of his action, as something that
runs in opposition to financial logic...however, as has been admitted multiple times, it is his prerogative to teach whoever he chooses, as much as an
insufferable douchebag it may make him appear to be. Still, he is, in a sense, running a private business that people are paying HIM for.
On the other hand, military recruitment in schools is a completely different issue. First of all, many colleges and universities that such
recruitment happens at are public institutions, therefore, the universities and colleges have a responsibility, to an extent, to observe the wishes of
the public at large...secondly, and I think more importantly, it is not the mere presence of the recruiters in colleges that is objectable, but rather
the predatory practices undergone during the recruitment procedure, the offering of deceptive incentives to naive youths, etc.
In one situation, it is the simple and private transfer of funds for knowledge. The other is a far more complex creation of contractual
obligation.
That being said, I, as a moderate left-leaning individual, for one don't have a "major" objection to recruitment in universities...
...BTW...funny people are always telling liberals what their opinions are...