I think the metallic mercury is highly charged and actually disrupts the zero point field as it rotates, which is I believe is closely tied to
gravity and inertia, perhaps as described by Haisch and Rueda.
The Nazi Bell program supposedly used Einstein's unified field theory, which Einstein himself later rejected. As far as the Higgs boson, it is
just a mathematical crutch, a trick. I don't view it as a real theory and I don't expect the Higgs boson to be discovered.
Between this theory, dark matter, red shift theory and string theory, physics has veered into an abyss. We need to get back to basic
experimentation again. I have no doubt, however, that certain areas of the military have a much more comprehensive physical theory that allows
control of gravity and inertia.
Some strange coincidences reguarding fouches TR3B claims, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 7-3-2009 @ 08:43 AM by ev0lut10n2008
Maybe these craft aint run on supercooled mercury after all. Apparently, hydrogen, when under 250000 atmospheres turns into a metallic liquid AND
hydrogen can be supercooled to the point where it becomes a superfluid (its been done in russia) Sill difficult to do but easier than mercury, plus we
have lab equipment that can reach those pressures now so the us black projects community would find it a doddle. That number is just too much of a
coincidence for me, exactly the pressure fouche claims the tr3b operates at.
"in 1935, a group of chemists at Princeton University predicted that hydrogen may behave like a metal at pressures in excess of 250,000 atmospheres (25GPa). This initial prediction was found to be incorrect, and now a team from Edinburgh University are attempting to observe metallic hydrogen using pressures of 5,000,000 atmospheres and above (>500GPa)."
See www.time.com... and adsabs.harvard.edu... and en.wikipedia.org...
Even though the initial number was proven incorrect, it could still have been used by fouche in his claims BEFORE it was proven incorrect. It has also been shown that a spinning liquid metal (Mercury) can manipulate the mass of any object within its center. That has been done in a lab by GCT among others, not forgetting the nazi bell. Then there is the podkletnov research using superconductors that does the same thing. Mercury, when subjected to high current turns into a cold plasma and acts the same as a superconductor.
Also, since it appears thatmass is a direct function of electromagnetic waveforms interacting with the higgs field as stated by physicists then in order to manipulate it you would need to disrupt this field "magnetic field disruptor" Does it seem like fouche has simply put 2 and 2 together and fabricated his story from the current research or is he being used as a conduit to drip feed us information?? The best lies are hidden between two truths. What do you all think?
[edit on 7-3-2009 by ev0lut10n2008]
"in 1935, a group of chemists at Princeton University predicted that hydrogen may behave like a metal at pressures in excess of 250,000 atmospheres (25GPa). This initial prediction was found to be incorrect, and now a team from Edinburgh University are attempting to observe metallic hydrogen using pressures of 5,000,000 atmospheres and above (>500GPa)."
See www.time.com... and adsabs.harvard.edu... and en.wikipedia.org...
Even though the initial number was proven incorrect, it could still have been used by fouche in his claims BEFORE it was proven incorrect. It has also been shown that a spinning liquid metal (Mercury) can manipulate the mass of any object within its center. That has been done in a lab by GCT among others, not forgetting the nazi bell. Then there is the podkletnov research using superconductors that does the same thing. Mercury, when subjected to high current turns into a cold plasma and acts the same as a superconductor.
Also, since it appears thatmass is a direct function of electromagnetic waveforms interacting with the higgs field as stated by physicists then in order to manipulate it you would need to disrupt this field "magnetic field disruptor" Does it seem like fouche has simply put 2 and 2 together and fabricated his story from the current research or is he being used as a conduit to drip feed us information?? The best lies are hidden between two truths. What do you all think?
[edit on 7-3-2009 by ev0lut10n2008]
Pages: ^^TOP^^
Unmarked Chinese 747 rolls through SFO (San Francisco International airport)
Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
Posted 12 days ago with 10 member flags
Drones to the rescue ~ Repairing local economies in Ohio, coming to your State soon!
Posted 0 days ago with 10 member flags
Posted 0 days ago with 10 member flags
Eerie Second World War RAF fighter plane discovered in the Sahara
Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Amazing video of 747 lifting in place in extreme wind conditions
Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
HIFiRE Scramjet Research Flight Will Advance Hypersonic Technology
Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.045 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.045 seconds
