It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hey... NASA More UFOs!

page: 5
46
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by paul76

My gut instinct tells me that they're probably something conventional as if they were not, NASA would not publish them in the first place and if they were of any interest, then they were being released on purpose, a tease if you like.

[edit on 7-3-2009 by paul76]


Mm, if i get what you mean, yes, there are many things put out by NASA which leave me questioning their intentions.. like STS-75, just to name the first thing that comes to mind.




posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:21 PM
link   
Those things look like standard pulsating and glowing ufo orbs. Same as we see here on Planet Earth. Did somebody claim they were buzzards or sea eagles before I watched the footage lol? That footage is just like what we are seeing here on the crust of Earth.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by ufoorbhunter
That footage is just like what we are seeing here on the crust of Earth.

Some of the footage?.. Yes. The problem is that most people have never seen orbs.. So naturally, they doubt the existence of these objects (e.g; no frame of reference). And simultaneously doubt the person(s) who've seen them, or doubt they're perception.

There also people who've seen them, but they would never talk about it. Not even with those closest to them.

Guess it all comes down to experience.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by alyosha1981
 


I have trouble finding anything to indicate that any of those sightings have intelligent control. Some objects are obviously adrift, and practically all objects shown are not detailed enough to identify any features.

So yes, they may be UFO's, or in my opinion UDO's (unidentified drifting objects).

The only STS video I've ever found convincing (to me anyway) is the one in which an object reverses direction (it's very popular, I'm sure most of you guys have seen)

-rrr



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by paul76
 


You are so correct. (I know from experience.)...always lots of "storytelling" too, by these 'big guys', but they don't deliver...
And Jamie is no NASA UFO expert...at all.

I also agree that some take 'evidence' from other people, and sell it as their own.
... Me, I will enjoy the free video available on ATS, through links in posts, and You Tube!



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:34 PM
link   
reply to post by rickyrrr
 


Originally posted by rickyrrr
The only STS video I've ever found convincing (to me anyway) is the one in which an object reverses direction (it's very popular, I'm sure most of you guys have seen)

Well, there is more than one STS video that fit this description. Namely; the STS-114, and STS-48.

But I personally like the STS-80 footage the most.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns

If there was that much debris floating around up there doing hap hazard manuvers all over the place, then not only would the shuttle be in jeapordy every time it goes up there, but every single satellite as well as the ISS being subject to getting hit by these hap hazard traveling objects..or debris as you put it.



There is that much debris.

www.space.com...

They ARE in jeopardy. Regardless of whether the number of alien spacecraft is 1000 or zero.

-rrr



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by alyosha1981
I think those sites are trying to discredit Jamie Maussan, I believe some of what he says, not all but I give him an A for effort! Phage in the video we have actuall NASA footage Maussan is just presenting it.


Nope. Maussan's minion Yturria Garza shows Leroy Cain at the press conference discussing the tumbling flasher, but then does NOT show the pictures Cain and the crew referred to, the hi-res digital camera images that showed which part of the tail hinge had flaked off -- NASA also released a pix of the part before it was installed.

In other words, to excite his target audience, Mausson withholds explanatory material in order to mock NASA for withholding information.

Now that's a cosmic belly laugh or two.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by JimOberg

Originally posted by alyosha1981
I think those sites are trying to discredit Jamie Maussan, I believe some of what he says, not all but I give him an A for effort! Phage in the video we have actuall NASA footage Maussan is just presenting it.


Nope. Maussan's minion Yturria Garza shows Leroy Cain at the press conference discussing the tumbling flasher, but then does NOT show the pictures Cain and the crew referred to, the hi-res digital camera images that showed which part of the tail hinge had flaked off -- NASA also released a pix of the part before it was installed.

In other words, to excite his target audience, Mausson withholds explanatory material in order to mock NASA for withholding information.

Now that's a cosmic belly laugh or two.



My take on maussan has always been that he is well intentioned but not thorough.

-rrr



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Majorion
 
The pulsating/blinking effect is bang on ufo orb style. That's how they act. The more the evidence comes out from TPTB (NASA) the more believeable it is to the general public. Those pulstaing ufo orbs on this footage do share the same visuals. Interesting stuff and defo not buzzard vultures lol!



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns
A lot of people have said those two satellites colliding was an intentional act, ranging from theorists saying it was to instigate a war, to an attempt to destroy some weapon platform and even theorized that a UFO had something to do with it, destroying both satellites and that the cover up was saying they collided.


No surprise here. And all the theories are baloney, since they show no indication of knowledge of what would be involved in making them collide on purpose -- first of all, on-board sensors and powerful maneuvering jets. Without that, no remote-control ground-directed collision is possible.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 03:59 PM
link   
I have no doubt that Jaime Maussan probably twisted the NASA statements out of context to fit his sensationalist agenda. However, some of the footage's are compelling, and I'm sure that most of it is real NASA footage.

Well worth examination in my opinion.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 04:22 PM
link   
I also think Jamie M (and JimO!) are well intentioned, and help keep this topic interesting...
I keep coming back to read more! ...RE: my earlier comments... I did not intend to join in on any "discrediting" Jamie M. session, either.

Everyone is welcome to debate this NASA UFO topic, of course...
all we are really doing is debating "what", these Objects, Flying around the orbiting shuttles, ARE...that's all.

Are they Unidentified, as in UFO...or something 100% identified and thus IFOs?
I believe they must remain UFOs, as debris and ice theories still raise much reasonable doubt,
no matter how "technical" the posts get.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 04:35 PM
link   
Hey all!

Well I have to say I was rather disappointed with all of the attacks on J.Maussan and his motives, as I have been bashed before for supporting him I was pleased with the consistent re direction to put the thread back on topic. I have faith that the video shows actual NASA footage, containing questionable objects ( as is becoming more and more frequent) NASA has been lacking a bit as of late in their endeavor to conceal the truth from us why? I don't have an answer, but I do think it's baby steps to disclosure.

I don't practice lynching public ufo researchers, I think I'm smart enough to receive the information and content making my own interpretations. Regardless of who presents the footage, I will argue, it's still good footage and worth some examination. As far as the "blurred" quality of some portions contained within, what do you expect? this is common in this area and IMO, to be expected. I don't think the fast moving black object captured in the landing shot is a bird, does that mean it's not? no that's only my opinion.

To my knowledge no still shots of that object are available to be scrutinized, if there is then I would love to hear the results, as I'm no image expert.
With all of the strange things we have seen captured on NASA film, imagine what we haven't seen



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by lee anoma
.

I just hate the title because it's composed all wrong.

"Hey...NASA More UFOs!"
Shouldn't it be "Hey NASA...More UFOs!"
Maybe even "Hey...More NASA UFOs!"



LOL! I see what you mean, I actually just used the title of the youtube video for the thread title, trying to keep everything "in line" I tend to do that with videos I present for discussion.



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 04:51 PM
link   
For anyone interested in NASA footage then this is a good documentary I found, split into 2 parts:

[PART 1]: thepiratebay.org...(WTC-SWE)

[PART 2]: thepiratebay.org...(WTC-SWE)



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 04:59 PM
link   
One of the clips looked like a flying pyramid. And another like a tube sort of object. For some reason I alwaysed assumed these werent really physical crafts.

I think it was the last clip shich was the silver tube like object and another somewhere in the middle which looked just like a floating pyramid. It blurs in and out really fast though, but it definitly looks like a physical object.

[edit on 7-3-2009 by Hullahoop]



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 05:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Lee_K
 


Thanks for the links Lee, I'll check them out
I'm always interested in good NASA footage I like to see them with their foot in their mouth



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 05:22 PM
link   
I was actually a bit disappointed. Nothing was shown that couldn't be explained, other than the shuttle landing part.

I'm a pretty big believer myself, but i mostly saw lens flares/effects, debris and optical artifacts. Movement showed no sign of intelligence like some of the other shuttle videoes there are - only stuff rotating and going in a straight line.

Sorry



posted on Mar, 7 2009 @ 05:32 PM
link   
reply to post by K-Raz
 


What about the first object coming into the shot then out then back in
pulsating with light as is common with the objects seen in shuttle missions.




top topics



 
46
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join