Attention: No more duplicate VAMPIRE threads, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times


reply posted on 11-3-2009 @ 01:34 AM by Malfeitor
I am thankful to those who run ATS for enforcing this policy where vampires are concerned; as previously mentioned in conversation, it has always been a policy of ATS to remove or redirect duplicate threads. For a time, I had wondered why this hadn't seemed to apply to vampire threads, and finally came to the conclusion that nobody really cared. Lord knows I didn't; it was simply annoying. However, its good to see that even in less-acknowledged areas of the forum, attention is being given to the posts.
At least one poster on this particular thread has voiced quite vehemently that this is a wrongful decision, and somehow infringing on his rights to speak; I think we come to ATS to be heard, and to listen, but seriously doubt anybody shares this person's issue. None of us with anything to say like to repeat ourselves time and again, and I, at least, detest hearing the same words from different mouths. Independent thought is to be valued and expressed, not assimilated and duplicated. It just doesn't work that way.
Lastly, I said in a previous thread that I, in no way, wish for vampire threads to be banned; my personal desire is, and has always been, for people to use evidence and fact rather than opinion and imagination. When discussing the theory of the vampire, those are valid testimony; when discussing the fact of the vampire, they fall quite short. My point becomes that we have never needed twenty different threads to cover what little there is to say about this mythological, albeit popular, creature.
Keep up the good work, guys.


reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 01:56 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by LucidDreamer85



I think that the word "duplicate" is key in understanding the new rule.

If the same thread/discussion is already around, don't make a new one.
If you have a totally new one, then you can post it.
But try to add on to the ones already around.


reply posted on 16-3-2009 @ 02:19 PM by Gemwolf
reply to post by LucidDreamer85



I suggest you read the 1st post, then the rest of the thread, and if there is still any confusion, I would be glad to answer any questions you may still have.

[edit on 16-3-2009 by Gemwolf]


reply posted on 18-3-2009 @ 04:45 PM by LucidDreamer85
Originally posted by Gemwolf
reply to
post by LucidDreamer85



I suggest you read the 1st post, then the rest of the thread, and if there is still any confusion, I would be glad to answer any questions you may still have.

[edit on 16-3-2009 by Gemwolf]


No I understand and actually am quite embarrassed. Sorry for the stupid questions.
:-(


reply posted on 27-7-2009 @ 09:48 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by The Soothsayer



www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here's the policy. It is five years old, but that's it in writing. It's supposed to be a general outline, I think. Because some topics have a thousand threads, and some only have two. So of course they would discourage repeats on the threads with the most topics.


When you have a new thought on an old topic, pick up an old thread(s) and...

1) Long recent thread: If the existing thread is too long (more than 15 pages) reference the thread or threads in your first post by linking to them, then pick up with your new twist on the existing discussion.

2) Old existing thread: If the existing thread is more than 3 months old, reference the thread or threads in your first post by linking to them, then as above, indicate your new twist on the older discussion topic.

3) Current events: If you know your topic is related to current news, please take some time to see if it's being covered in our current discussions. Simply find the thread and add your new thoughts to the existing discussion.

Locking or Removing Threads: If you create a new thread on existing topics, especially current events, it may get moved to the "trash bin", or locked by a moderator indicating there is an existing discussion. If this happens, please don't take it personal... it is difficult to keep up with the pace of discussion on ATS at times, and this action by no means reflects on our opinion of you as a member of ATS.


When new users find ATS, it is most often through a Google search. We tend to get 12,000+ people a day coming to this domain from search engine searches (and have had peaks of 60,000 in one day!). Very often, they find older threads. From a user experience perspective, it makes more sense to contain thread continuity through the evolution of thought from original idea, to the newly discovered ideas.

Also, when any thread gets beyond 15 pages, it's time to consider if there needs to be a new thread spawned. Most threads at that length usually contain two or more sub-topics with various involved members focusing on singular sub-topics within a long multi-topic thread.


The Cryptozoology forum is one of the smaller forums on ATS. Therefore, it's easier to control things like duplicate threads (there are only 58 pages of threads in here!)

We were having a slight problem with the vast amount of vampire threads compared to the amount of cryptozoological threads or threads on other mythical beasts.

It also wasn't all vampire threads. "All new vampire Q&A threads will be deleted. Vampire sightings or personal experiences are naturally still welcome."
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Strange creatures from Marianas Trench
  Posted 5 days ago with 26 member flags
\'Woolly mammoth\' caught on camera in Siberia
  Posted 4 days ago with 19 member flags
icelandic lake monster spotted! (VIDEO)
  Posted 5 days ago with 16 member flags
The Bridgewater Triangle
  Posted 19 days ago with 10 member flags
Shape-Shifting Dinosaurs by Jack Horner (TED Talk)
  Posted 2 days ago with 6 member flags
Bigfoot Attack...or is the Lizard Man in Georgia?
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
\'mutant spider fears at nuclear wastelab\'
  Posted 6 days ago with 4 member flags