Can anyone disprove evolution? Yes evolution is a theory and no it hasn't been disproven yet. If you can truly disprove it with proof than this thread will essentially be done, and the world changed forever.

What's to prove wrong? I already agreed that a theory is not always fully made of proven facts.

Those who tell you evolution is a fact are probably not scientist. There are facts within the theory of evolution and there are concepts that are not proven. Such is a theory. I thought there was some groundbreaking news to be found here, so I stepped in.

Originally posted by B.A.C.


Proof of what?

Proof that evolution is not fact. Just because you give two Wiki links to someone's definition of the word "theory" and "fact" does not provide proof that "evolution" is not fact, or for that matter, a fact.

Same with creationalism.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
You can search Google and Webster's and Britannica until the cows come home.

What does that have to do with proof that the theory of evolution isn't a fact? Not a damned thing.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
Prove ME wrong, I say I've already presented my proof, if you consider it an unreliable source, show us a more reliable source that says different.

Cheers.

Perhaps you should focus on what your thread title is saying and show us that proof instead of definitions of two words.

In essence, I have already proven you wrong in as far as what this thread topic is about....which is proving evolution is not a fact...not the definition of the words "theory" and "fact".


Cheers!!!! (BURP)

[edit on 6-3-2009 by RFBurns]

I felt the same way, but it was an opinion being posted. I am trying to get someone to back up the dismissal of evolution, for stating a bold statement deserves actual proof and I would like to see that proof.

Originally posted by RFBurns

Originally posted by B.A.C.


Proof of what?

Proof that evolution is not fact. Just because you give two Wiki links to someone's definition of the word "theory" and "fact" does not provide proof that "evolution" is not fact, or for that matter, a fact.

Same with creationalism.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
You can search Google and Webster's and Britannica until the cows come home.

What does that have to do with proof that the theory of evolution isn't a fact? Not a damned thing.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
Prove ME wrong, I say I've already presented my proof, if you consider it an unreliable source, show us a more reliable source that says different.

Cheers.

Perhaps you should focus on what your thread title is saying and show us that proof instead of definitions of two words.

In essence, I have already proven you wrong in as far as what this thread topic is about....which is proving evolution is not a fact...not the definition of the words "theroy" and "fact".


Cheers!!!! (BURP)

[edit on 6-3-2009 by RFBurns]

I am VERY focused on what my thread title is saying, you seem to have a hard time with it though.

It says that the Theory of Evolution isn't a fact. Do you agree that it says that?

Oh yea and it says that I can PROVE IT.

No claims about Evolution, Creationism, Elohim, nothing else.....

It says exactly what it says. You don't like that do you?

Too bad.

deny ignorance

Cheers.

[edit on 6-3-2009 by B.A.C.]

I have to say that this post is a tease to those of us who wanted to see new evidence. All that you did is define a word to create controversy.

Originally posted by B.A.C.

I am VERY focused on what my thread title is saying, you seem to have a hard time with it though.

Really? I dont know about that. Seems like you are the one having the difficult time. I could care less what anyone would think of what I believe, I am just asking for what your thread is saying...proof that the theory of evolution isnt a fact.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
It says that the Theory of Evolution isn't a fact. Do you agree that it says that?

Yep, thats what it says alright.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
Oh yea and it says that I can PROVE IT.

No, your post says "I can PROVE IT". So....where is this proof?

Originally posted by B.A.C.
No claims about Evolution, Creationism, Elohim, nothing else.....

The claim in both the title of the thread and your post is proof of the theory of evolution isnt a fact and you can prove it. So prove it.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
It says exactly what it says. You don't like that do you?

I do not see where that comes into play here, what does it matter what I like or not like? Im only after this proof you say you got. So prove it.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
Too bad.

Ya..too bad you dont have the proof of anything..other than proving your inabilitiy to answer a simple request.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
deny ignorance

No kidding. Perhaps its something you should take into serious consideration.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
Cheers.

BURP!!!!

Originally posted by Unityrover
I try to explain this to my evolutionist friends all the time, but they don't get it/ refuse to acknowledge it. A scientific fact is something that can be observed or reproduced in a laboratory setting. Macro-Evolution (The idea of a species breeding beyond itself, so it cannot reproduce with a member of a previous generation - no, mules don't count) is a THEORY. (same goes with any origin of the universe hypothesis) Believing in something you can't see is faith. Don't push your beliefs on me.

You lose points for sourcing Wikipedia though. XD

LOL about the Wikipedia statement

I did it on purpose though, because you'll never find a more straight forward definition than what I gave and you'll never find a source that goes against it.

Thanks for the postive input

[edit on 6-3-2009 by B.A.C.]

Again, I can see it. You are giving the definition of fact and theory. In doing so you are starting controversy. Admit it for me...

Originally posted by B.A.C.
Let's start with some science so Evolutionists can't say anything about how I'm a crazy Creationist.

The science part is easy. You don't address it for a reason.

But let's start where your challenge to the scientific community does.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

I just won the debate.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

Originally posted by acewilliams
Again, I can see it. You are giving the definition of fact and theory. In doing so you are starting controversy. Admit it for me...

Nope it has nothing to do with starting controversy. I am just trying to clarify something.

I am tired of hearing this: Evolutionist, "The Theory of Evolution is a fact".

That's all. No more or less.

Cheers.

The Theory of evolution is a theory that has not been disproven yet. No it is not a fact, it by name and function is a theory.

Originally posted by Screed

Originally posted by B.A.C.
Let's start with some science so Evolutionists can't say anything about how I'm a crazy Creationist.

The science part is easy. You don't address it for a reason.

But let's start where your challenge to the scientific community does.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

I just won the debate.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

You have an Alien avatar and post on AboveTopSecret.

I LOL'd at this post.

Anyway, I did use Science.

I used Scientific Definitions for words. It will work with their non scientific definitions as well though.

Cheers.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
I am tired of hearing this: Evolutionist, "The Theory of Evolution is a fact".

That's all. No more or less.

Cheers.

And I'm tired of asstards like Bill and Mark giving cavemen like you a voice just so they can sell titty ads.

Cheers.

That was the most honest thing you read on ATS this year.

I'll be banned in 5 minutes.

Truth hurts.