Don't let them tell you that "The Theory of Evolution" is a fact., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times
Topic started on 6-3-2009 @ 01:14 AM by B.A.C.
I say there is an "organized conspiracy to influence science education - ATS" by saying that The Theory of Evolution is a fact.

Originally posted by B.A.C.
This one little statement "The Theory of Evolution is a fact" will STOP someone from believing anything else. I'm not talking just belief in God, I'm talking about belief in other scientists as well. It isn't true. I can and have proved it. That's why it's VERY important to be perfectly clear.


I can PROVE that "The Theory of Evolution" is NOT a fact.

No more, no less.

Let's start with some science.

I'll define "Theory" and I'll define "Fact" scientifically and I'll do it in a very easy to understand way.

A "Theory" is a plausible way of explaining verifiable observations (facts).
en.wikipedia.org... That was simple wasn't it?

A "Fact" is a verifiable observation. en.wikipedia.org... Another simple one.

Now the next time you hear someone say The Theory of Evolution is a fact, you can say NO it isn't and prove it.

Is Evolution a fact? Yes

Is Gravity a fact? Yes

Is The Theory of Gravity a fact? Of course not it's a theory that explains the fact of gravity.

Is the Theory of Evolution a fact? Of course not it's a theory that explains the fact of Evolution.

A Theory is not a Fact. A Fact is not a Theory. A Theory explains Facts.

I bet 90% of Evolutionists and Scientists say The Theory of Evolution is fact. This is proof of the conspiracy.

Or they will admit that the Theory of Evolution is not a fact. Which they will NEVER do. You won't see them admit this basic TRUTH.

The proof will be in this thread.

Edit: It took four pages of arguing on this thread for the first Evolutionist to admit that The Theory of Evolution is not a fact. Evidence of a conspiracy by science and evolutionists? Possibly.

deny ignorance



[edit on 6-3-2009 by B.A.C.]


reply posted on 6-3-2009 @ 01:35 AM by Wertdagf
reply to post by B.A.C.



But doesnt a fact always seen as a theory to the ignorant? If somone is incapable of understanding the information then how could they ever accept it as a fact.


reply posted on 6-3-2009 @ 01:45 AM by B.A.C.
Originally posted by ohh_pleasee
Interesting.

You know I have a friend who has yet to tell me his big theory on why Evolution was a lie and why he is a Creationist(Something along the lines of Darwinism is a religion?).

Unfortunately we haven't had the chance to get together to chat about this one yet, supposedly there is so much that needs to be explained that you can't talk about it in a quick 15 min break lol.

I'm a bit delighted to stumble upon this for that reason. My one question to all creationists is this:

What about the dinosaurs?

Excuse me if I'm wrong, but I have heard directly that Creation was some 6,000 years ago roundabout, and the dinosaurs went around 65 MILLION years ago.

I even saw this episode on tv where this Christian family took their kids to a museum of creation, saying that this is actually when the dinosaurs lived, not millions of years ago(as proved by science).

So what gives?

I'm not trying to seem condescending here, just curious as to what your take on this is(and ALL Creationists, for that matter).


I believe in a Creator.

I acknowledge there is a lot of evidence for evolution just not enough for me to give up my faith, that's all.

I'm not sure about the dinosaurs, who knows?

I do know that I don't consider dinosaurs to contradict the Bible.

In the Bible God clearly creates beast before man Gen 1:20. Who knows how long God played with them?

That isn't really the point of this thread. I made this thread so Evolutionists will quit calling The Theory of Evolution a fact.

Cheers.


reply posted on 6-3-2009 @ 01:54 AM by JPhish
reply to post by tamusan



great post tamusan. A small post but a big contribution to this thread.


reply posted on 6-3-2009 @ 01:54 AM by RFBurns
reply to post by B.A.C.



So where is the proof?

Two Wiki entries hardly constitutes proof of either.

Cheers!!!!



reply posted on 6-3-2009 @ 02:05 AM by B.A.C.
Originally posted by RFBurns
reply to
post by B.A.C.



So where is the proof?

Two Wiki entries hardly constitutes proof of either.

Cheers!!!!


Proof of what?

You can search Google and Webster's and Britannica until the cows come home.

Prove ME wrong, I say I've already presented my proof, if you consider it an unreliable source, show us a more reliable source that says different.

Cheers.

[edit on 6-3-2009 by B.A.C.]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 16 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags
Evolution. Not a theory, but a fact!
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Evolutionary theory: Gaps and not yet understood phenonemon
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags