Originally posted by liesnomore
The Bible was written by a Piso family from around year of 65 A.D and been rewritten many times up to present. That book was written to contradict
existed Jews religion and create a new one. All characters in that book are fictional.
the NT is not the ¨bible¨. its part of it. if you are going to educate us, at least do it right.
are you seriously going to expect me to believe that people of that time put faith in a forgery that depicted fictional people that would have been
still alive while the they were reading the texts?
lets say i wrote about a fictional person and said that he resurrected people and healed people and was this great teacher and that his disciples did
similar things and infact he caused this big ruckus, and he did it all in NYC and they did it 30 years ago. im telling you its true.
do you know how easy it would be to shoot me down? all you would have to do is go to NYC and realize that noone knew who you were talking about.
friend or enemy. you honestly think that a person wouldnt be able to see through baloney 30 years after it supposedly happened?
christians had a documented presence, why, because something happened that made them believe, even when it meant being thrown to lions in a
this theory also does nothing to explain why the church would try to destroy the bible, neither does it explain their failure to do so.
use your head people, just because something happened long ago doesnt mean its ¨unverifiable¨
now to the video.
horus, born on dec 25th....
whats funny about this is 2 things, 1- its not claimed that horus was born on the 25th, its actually the 21st. it interesting that they should bend
that because its convenient. 2- bible never gives a date for jesus´birth. in fact from the context of his birth, it was more likely in the early fall
since the shepards were still out doors. the catholics later put his birth on the 25th to coincide with the celebrating of the sun. )not in the
so not only does the video fail with egyptian history, but they forgot to actually read the passage to see if there was an actual dec 25th birth
mentioned in the bible.
horus, born of a virgin
no evidence to support this so, please....
horus, heralded by a star in the east.
no evidence. moving on
horus, adorned by 3 kings
no evidence. even if there was jesus was adorned by wise men (it doesnt say 3, oh but that would mean that the researchers would actually have to READ
the bible), possibly astrologers several years after jesus´ birth.
horus never taught, and was never baptized. anup the baptizer doesnt even exist.
horus had 12 disciples -- no it was actually 4.
horus walked on water - no evidence.
horus called ¨lamb of god¨ - show me the story and ill believe it.
horus crucified - actually it was stung by a scorpion. yes, the similarities are uncanny!
horus resurrected - yes but no mention of 3 days
what really kills me about this whole stupid video, is that it cant even get the details of jesus´life straight.
so tell me, as a person who is appreciates truth, am i really expected to take this video seriously?